On the Interface Between Minds and Concepts

  • Semiha Akinci
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 94)


Conceptual Change External World Concept Structure Linguistic Expression Actual Entity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, M. Marilyn (1977). ‘‘Ockham’s Nominalism and Unreal Entities’’, The Philosophical Review 6, 144–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Bennett (1957). “Review of Frege’s ‘The Thought: A Logical Inquiry’ ”, Journal of Symbolic Logic 22, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. H. Brown (1986). ‘‘Sellars, Concepts and Conceptual Change’’, Synthese 68, 275–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Carnap (1947). Meaning and Necessity, (University of Chicago Press.)Google Scholar
  5. Gottlob Frege (1996). ‘‘On Sense and Reference’’, in A.P. Martinich (ed.), The Philosophy of Language, 3th edition, (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Gottlob Frege (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung, Translated in P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Oxford: Blackwell, 1952).Google Scholar
  7. Michael Dummett (1981), The Interpretations of Frege’s Philosophy. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  8. D. Kaplan (1989). ‘‘Demonstratives’’, in J. Almog et al. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan (NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  9. P. Kitcher (1979). ‘‘Frege’s Epistemology’’, The Philosophical Review 88, 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Kripke (1979). ‘‘A Puzzle About Belief’’, in A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).Google Scholar
  11. L. Linsky (1959). ‘‘Hesperus and Phosperus’’, The Philosophical Review 68, 515–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. W. Marshall (1956). ‘‘Sense and Reference: A Reply’’, The Philosophical Review 65, 342–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pelletier (2001). ‘‘Did Frege Believe in Frege’s Principle’’, Topoi 8, 309–325.Google Scholar
  14. J. Perry (1977). ‘‘Frege on Demonstratives’’, The Philosophical Review 86, 476–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Popper (1965). Conjectures and Refutations (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
  16. K. Popper (1972). Objective Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  17. W.V. Quine Orman. (1951). ‘‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’’, The Philosophical Review 60, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. W.V. Quine Orman. (1955). ‘‘On Frege’s Way Out’’, Mind 64, 485–501, reprinted in E. Klemke (ed.) 1968.Google Scholar
  19. J. Stanley (1997). ‘‘Names and Rigid Designations’’, in C. Wright and R. Hale (eds.), Companion to the Philosophy of Language (Blackwell).Google Scholar
  20. W. Sellars (1953). ‘‘Mind, Meaning and Behavior’’, Philosophical Studies 3, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. W. Sellars (1973). ‘‘Conceptual Change’’, in G. Pearce and M. Maynard (eds.), Conceptual Change (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), pp. 77–93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Semiha Akinci

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations