The Meaning of Empathic Understanding in Human Inquiry

  • Adri Smaling
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 94)


Social Dimension Affective Empathy Analogical Theory Affective Aspect Emotional Identification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. M. Alvesson, “Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research”, Academy of Management Review, 2003, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Barnes and P. Thagard, Empathy and analogy, { Empathy.html}; 1997.Google Scholar
  3. G.T. Barrett-Lennard, “The Empathy Cycle: Refinement of a Nuclear Concept”, Journal of Counseling Psychology 28, 91–100.Google Scholar
  4. M.F. Basch, “Empathic Understanding: A Review of the Concept and Some Theoretical Considerations”, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 31, 101–126.Google Scholar
  5. H. Blumer, Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1969).Google Scholar
  6. A.C. Bohart and L.S. Greenberg, (eds.), Empathy Reconsidered. New Directions in Psychotherapy (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997).Google Scholar
  7. J.D. Bozarth, “Empathy from the Framework of Client-Centered Theory and the Rogerian Hypothesis”, in A.C. Bohart and L.S. Greenberg (eds.), Empathy Reconsidered, (Washington, D.C.: APA, 1997), pp. 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Bru, “Empathie: meer dan een houding”, Journal for Humanistics, 2001, 2, 5, pp. 50–57.Google Scholar
  9. Ch.H. Cooley, “The Roots of Social Knowledge”, The American Journal of Sociology, 1926, 32, pp. 59–79.Google Scholar
  10. R.G. Collingwood, The idea of History (Oxford: Clarendon, 1946).Google Scholar
  11. W. Dilthey, Selected Writings (edited and translated by H.P. Rickman; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  12. J. Duyndam, “Is medeleven goed?” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 2001, 93, 1, pp. 16–28.Google Scholar
  13. J. Duyndam, “Empowerment by Empathy. On Good and Gruesome Empathy”, in A. Halsema & D. van Houten (eds.), Empowering Humanity. State of the art in humanistics (Utrecht: De Tijdstroom, 2002), pp. 139–148.Google Scholar
  14. N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer, “Critical Issues in the Study of Empathy”, in N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer (eds.), Empathy and Its Development (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
  15. B. Fay, Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science (Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar
  16. H.-G. Gadamer, Truth and Method (London: Sheed and Ward, 1975). (Originally in German: Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen, 1960.)Google Scholar
  17. H.-G. Gadamer, “On the Circle of Understanding”, in John M. Connolly and Thomas Keutner (eds.) Hermeneutics versus Science? (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988), pp. 68–78.Google Scholar
  18. E.T. Gendlin, “The experiential response”, in E. Hammer (ed.) The Use of Interpretation in Treatment, (New York: Grune & Stratton, 1968), pp. 208–227.Google Scholar
  19. A. Giddens, New Rules of Sociological Method (London: Hutchinson, 1976).Google Scholar
  20. G.A. Gladstein, “The Role of Empathy in Counseling: Theoretical Considerations”, in G.A. Gladstein and Ass., Empathy and Counseling, explorations in Theory and Research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. R.L. Gorden, Interviewing: Strategy, Techniques, and Tactics (Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  22. C.G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science (New York: The Free Press, 1965).Google Scholar
  23. M.L. Hoffman, “Development of Prosocial Motivation: Empathy and Guilt,” in N. Heisenberg (ed.), The Development of Prosocial Behavior (New York, 1982), pp. 218–231.Google Scholar
  24. K.J. Holyoak and P. Thagard, Mental Leaps (Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  25. R. Van den Hoofdakker, “Empathie”, Journal for Humanistics, 2001, 2, 5, pp. 7–15.Google Scholar
  26. E. Hoogeveen, Eenvoud en strategie. De praktijk van humanistisch geestelijk werk (Amersfoort/Leuven: Acco, 1991).Google Scholar
  27. E. Husserl, Cartesianische Mediationen und Pariser Vorträge (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950).Google Scholar
  28. E. Husserl, Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1952). (First English edition in 1931; first German edition in 1913).Google Scholar
  29. T. Jorna, (ed.), Door eenvoud verbonden. Over de theorie en de praktijk van het humanistisch geestelijk raadswerk (Utrecht: Kwadraat, 1997).Google Scholar
  30. R. Josselson, “Imagining the Real. Empathy, Narrative, and the Dialogic Self,” in R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (eds.) Interpreting Experience: The Narrative Study of Lives (London: Sage, 1995), pp. 27–42.Google Scholar
  31. H. Kohut, “Introspection, Empathy, and Psychoanalysis: An Examination of the Relationship Between Mode of Observation and Theory”, in P. H. Ornstein (ed.) The Search for the Self (New York: International Universities Press, 1959), Vol. 1, pp. 205–232.Google Scholar
  32. H. Kohut, “On empathy,” in P. H. Ornstein (ed.), The Search for the Self (New York: International Universities Press, 1981), Vol.4, pp. 525–535.Google Scholar
  33. H. Kohut, How Does Analysis Cure? (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  34. H.H. Kögler, “Empathy, Dialogical Self, and Reflexive Interpretation: The Symbolic Source of Simulation,” in H.H. Kögler & K.R. Stueber (eds.), Empathy and agency, (Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 2000), pp. 194–221.Google Scholar
  35. H.H. Kögler and K.R. Stueber, (eds.), Empathy and Agency. The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences (Boulder, Colorado, US.; Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  36. S. Kvale, InterViews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1996).Google Scholar
  37. R.H. Lauer and W.H. Handel, Social Psychology: The Theory and Application of Symbolic Interaction (Boston: Houghron Mifflin, 1977/1983).Google Scholar
  38. D.S. MacIsaac, “Empathy: Heinz Kohut’s Contribution,” in A.C. Bohart & L.S. Greenberg (eds.) Empathy Reconsidered (Washington, DC: APA, 1997), pp. 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. A.R. Mackor, “Rechtvaardigheid, barmhartigheid en empathie”, Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 2001, 93, 1, pp. 29–45.Google Scholar
  40. J. Marcia, “Empathy and Psychotherapy,” in N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer (eds.) Empathy and its Development (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 81–102.Google Scholar
  41. G.H. Mead, Mind, Self, and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934).Google Scholar
  42. M. Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962). (First French edition in 1945.)Google Scholar
  43. M. Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968). (First French edition in 1964.)Google Scholar
  44. J.H.M. Mooren, “Emoties,” in J.J.A. Doolaard (ed.), Handboek geestelijke verzorging in zorginstellingen, (Kampen: Kok, 1996), pp. 857–866.Google Scholar
  45. E. Nagel, The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961).Google Scholar
  46. Th. Nickles, (ed.), Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality (Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel, 1980).Google Scholar
  47. K.R. Popper, Objective Knowledge (Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  48. K.R. Popper and J.C. Eccles, The Self and its Brain. An argument for Interactionism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983).Google Scholar
  49. H. De Preester “Epistemological Questions Concerning the In-Depth Body and the Coming About of the Ego” (in this volume 2006).Google Scholar
  50. T. Reik, Listening with the Third Ear (New York: Farrar-Strauss, 1949).Google Scholar
  51. P. Ricoeur, Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  52. C.R. Rogers, Client-Centered Therapy Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1951).Google Scholar
  53. C.R. Rogers, On Becoming a Person. A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961).Google Scholar
  54. C.R. Rogers, “The Interpersonal Relationship: The Core of Guidance,” in C.R. Rogers and B. Stevens (eds.), Person to Person. The Problem of Being Human (New York: Pocket Books, 1967), pp. 85–101.Google Scholar
  55. H.J. Rubin and I.S. Rubin, Qualitative Interviewing. The Art of Hearing Data (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995).Google Scholar
  56. R.S. Rudner, Philosophy of Social Science (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1966).Google Scholar
  57. A. Ryan, The Philosophy of the Social Sciences (London: Macmillan, 1970).Google Scholar
  58. A. Schutz, Collected Papers I, ed. M. Natanson (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962).Google Scholar
  59. A. Schutz, Collected Papers II, ed. A. Brodersen (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964).Google Scholar
  60. F. Schleiermacher, Hermeneutik (edited by H. Kimmerle; Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1959).Google Scholar
  61. C. Seale, “Qualitative interviewing”, in C. Seale (ed.), Researching Society and Culture (London: Sage, 1998, pp. 202–216).Google Scholar
  62. D. Silverman, “The Impossible Dreams of Reformism and Romanticism”, in J.F. Gubrium & D. Silverman (eds.), The Politics of Field Research. Sociology Beyond Enlightenment (London: Sage, 1989), pp. 30–48.Google Scholar
  63. A. Smaling, “Objectiviteit en rolneming”, in I. Maso & A. Smaling (eds.), Objectiviteit in kwalitatief onderzoek, ed. (Meppel, Amsterdam: Boom, 1990), pp. 30–49.Google Scholar
  64. A. Smaling, “Qualitative Interviewing: Contextualization and Empowerment,” in I. Maso and F. Wester (eds.), The Deliberate Dialogue, (Brussels: VUBpress, 1996), pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
  65. A. Smaling, “Dialogical Partnership – The Relationship Between the Researcher and the Researched in Action Research.,” in B. Boog, H. Coenen, L. Keune and R. Lammerts (eds.), The Complexity of Relationships in Action Research (Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1998), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  66. A. Smaling and I. Maso, “The Humanist Potentialities of Qualitative Research: Inner Growth, Dialogical Relationships, Empowerment and Normative Professionalism,” in A. Halsema & D. van Houten (eds.), Empowering Humanity. State of the Art in Humanistics (Utrecht: De Tijdstroom, 2002), pp. 37–60.Google Scholar
  67. E. Stein, On the Problem of Empathy (Washington, D.C: ICS Publications (Kluwer), 1989; third revised edition; first English edition in 1962; first German edition in 1917).Google Scholar
  68. S. Strasser, The Idea of Dialogal Phenomenology (Pittsburgh, Pa.: Duquesne University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  69. P.M. Van Strien, Empathie. Een kwaliteitsaspect van de psychoanalytische praktijk? (Amsterdam: Thela-Thesis, 1999).Google Scholar
  70. K.R. Stueber, “Understanding Other Minds and the Problem of Rationality”, in H.H.Kögler and Stueber, K.R. (eds.), Empathy and Agency (Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 2000), pp. 144–162.Google Scholar
  71. W. Van Tilburg, “Condities voor empathie”, Journal for Humanistics, 2001, 2, 5, pp. 24–31.Google Scholar
  72. G. Vielmetter, “Simulation and the Explanation of Action”, in H.H. Kögler and K.R. Stueber (eds.), Empathy and Agency (Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 2000), pp. 83–102.Google Scholar
  73. M. Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (New York: Free Press, 1949).Google Scholar
  74. M. Weber, “The Interpretive Understanding of Social Action,” in M. Brodbech (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences (New York: MacMillan, 1968), pp. 20–33.Google Scholar
  75. G.A.M. Widdershoven, “Hermeneutiek en client-centered psychotherapie”, in A.W.M. Mooij and G.A.M. Widdershoven (eds.), Hermeneutiek en psychologie. Interpretatie in theorievorming, onderzoek en psychotherapie (Meppel/Amsterdam: Boom, 1992), pp. 74–98.Google Scholar
  76. P. Winch, The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adri Smaling

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations