Abstract
Abstract. We describe a design synthesizing process which has been pointed out to be a key to creative design. We describe two topics of design study. First, from the perspectives of creativity, the conceptsynthesizing process is formed with the 1st primitive of the conceptsynthesizing process being ‘concept abstraction’ with the principle of ‘similarity’ in ‘taxonomical relations’, the 2nd primitive being ‘concept blending,’ in which the principle is ‘similarity’ and ‘dissimilarity’ in ‘taxonomical relations’, and the 3rd primitive being ‘concept integration’ and with the principle of ‘thematic relations’. Second, design experiments using protocol analysis were conducted to identify what/how design primitives are related to higher creativity. As a result, in the process of synthesizing concepts, thematic relations between two concepts significantly extend the design space, which led to higher creativity. Given this, the creative design process can be driven by the 3rd primitive of the concept-synthesizing process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boden, AM: 2004, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, Routledge.
Concept Dictionary: 2005, EDR Electronic Dictionary, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, CPD-V030.
Ericsson, K and Simon, HA: 1984, Protocol Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Fauconnier, G: 1994, Mental Spaces, Cambridge University Press, UK.
Fauconnier, G and Turner, M: 2002, The Way We Think – Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, Basic Book, NY.
Finke, R, Ward, T and Smith, S: 1992, Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications, Cambridge, the MIT Press, A Bradford Book, London.
Gardenfors, P: 2000, Conceptual Space, MIT Press, A Bradford Book, London.
Gero, JS and Maher, ML: 1991, Mutation and analogy to support creativity in computer-aided design, in GN Schmitt (ed), CAAD Futures, ETH, Zurich, pp. 241–249.
Goldschmidt, G: 2001, Visual analogy, in C Eastman, M McCracken and W Newsletter (eds), Cognition in Design Education, Elsevier, UK, pp. 199–219.
Harakawa, J, Nagai, Y and Taura, T: 2005, Conceptual synthesis in design creation, Proceedings of the 1st IDC, in CD-ROM, 2005.
Hayashi, M: 2002, Three Swedish Designs, Living Design, 21, Living Design Center, Tokyo, pp. 76–82.
Living Design Club (ed): Living Design Collection, (Jacobsen, A: Swan Chair 1958, Tendo: Mushroom-stool 2003, Long Island : Easy Chair 2002), Available Online: http://www.ozone.co.jp, last accessed November 2005.
Lawson, B: 1997, How Designers Think, Architectural Press, Oxford.
Taura, T, Nagai, Y and Tanaka, T: 2005, Design space blending-A key for creative design, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, the Design Society, Melbourne, CD-Rom.
Tuara, T, Yoshimi T and Ikai, T: 2002, Study of gazing points in design situation–A proposal and practice of an analytical method based on the explanation of design– activities, Design Studies 23(2): 165–186.
Taura, T and Nagai, Y: 2005, Primitives and principles of synthetic process for creative design, in JS Gero and ML Maher (eds), Proceedings of Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design VI, pp. 177–194.
Wisniewski, EJ and Bassok, M: 1999, What makes a man similar to a tie?, Cognitive Psychology 1(39): 208–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
NAGAI, Y., TAURA, T. (2006). FORMALDESCRIPTION OF CONCEPT-SYNTHESIZING PROCESS FOR CREATIVE DESIGN. In: GERO, J.S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition ’06. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5130-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5131-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)