Advertisement

BUILDINGS AND AFFORDANCES

  • ALEXANDER KOUTAMANIS

Abstract

The notion of affordances has been used to represent functionality and usability in several design areas. The paper considers its applicability to architecture and buildings. It discusses a distinction between the affordances of building elements and spaces, and a number of dimensions for the mapping of different aspects.

Keywords

Architectural Design Building Element Intended Function Visual Clue Cultural Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biederman, I: 1987, Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding, Psychological Review 94(2): 115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, DC and Blessing, L: 2005, The relationship between function and affordance, Proceedings of IDETC/CIE: ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Long Beach, California.Google Scholar
  3. Evans, GW and Mitchell McCoy, J: 1998, When buildings don’t work: The role of architecture in human health, Journal of Experimental Psychology 18: 85–94.Google Scholar
  4. Gibson, EJ and Walk, RD: 1960, The “Visual Cliff”, Scientific American 202: 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gibson, JJ: 1977, The theory of affordances, in RE Shaw and J Bransford (eds), Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
  6. Gibson, JJ: 1979, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  7. Heft, H: 1997, The relevance of Gibson’s ecological approach to perception for environment-behavior studies, in GT Moore and RW Marans (eds), Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design, Vol. 4, Plenum, New York, pp. 72–108.Google Scholar
  8. Hoffman, DD and Richards, W: 1985, Parts of recognition, Cognition 18: 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingold, T: 1992, Culture and the perception of the environment, in E Croll and D Parkin (eds), Bush Base: Forest Farm – Culture, Environment and Development, Routledge, London, pp. 39–56.Google Scholar
  10. Kim, HS, Park, KH and Kim, M: 1987, Shape decomposition by colinearity, Pattern Recognition Letters 6: 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koutamanis, A: 1997, Multilevel representation of architectural designs, in R Coyne, M Ramscar, J Lee and K Zreik (eds), Design and the Net, Europia Productions, Paris, pp. 74–84.Google Scholar
  12. Koutamanis, A, van Leusen, M and Mitossi, V: 2001, Route analysis in complex buildings, in B de Vries, J van Leeuwen and H Achten (eds), Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2001, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 711–724.Google Scholar
  13. Marr, D: 1982, Computer Vision, WH Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  14. McGrenere, J and Ho, W: 2000, Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept, in Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000, Montreal, pp. 179–186.Google Scholar
  15. Norman, D: 1988, The Psychology of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Norman, D: 2002, The Design of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Norman, DA: 1999, Affordance, conventions, and design, ACM Interactions 6(3): 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oliver, M: 2005, The problem with affordance, E-Learning 12(4): 402–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenfeld, A (ed): 1984, Multiresolution Image Processing and Analysis, Springer, Berlin.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosenfeld, A: 1990, Pyramid algorithms for efficient vision, in C Blakemore (ed), Vision: Coding and Efficiency, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 423–430.Google Scholar
  21. Tweed, C: 2001, Highlighting the affordances of designs, in B de Vries, J van Leeuwen and H Achten (eds), Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2001, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 681–696.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • ALEXANDER KOUTAMANIS
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations