Being our closest living relatives, chimps and bonobos provide the best available comparative evidence to study the evolutionary split between our sister taxon — the Neanderthals — and ourselves. Here, we analyze craniofacial development in these taxa from birth to adulthood using geometric morphometric methods. In both Homo and Pan, ontogenetic trajectories of sister taxa differ by their length, position and/or direction in shape space, as well as in the relationship between cranial size and shape. Modern human and bonobo ontogenies represent “abridged” versions of Neanderthal and chimp spatiotemporal developmental patterns, respectively, where “shortening” of trajectories is likely to represent evolutionary novelty. When examined in detail, however, the Neanderthal-human and chimp-bonobo splits do not represent equivalent forms of evolutionary developmental diversification. Rather, it appears that each bifurcation is the result of a different unique evolutionary event, during which the ancestral mode of growth and development was modified in a taxon-specific manner.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akazawa, T., Muhesen, S., Dodo, Y., Kondo, O., Mizoguchi, Y., 1995. Neanderthal infant burial. Nature 377, 585-586.
Bailey, S.E., 2002. A closer look at Neanderthal post-canine dental morphology: the mandibular den-tition. Anat. Rec. 269, 148-156.
Bailey, S.E., 2004. A morphometric analysis of maxil-lary molar crowns of Middle-Late Pleistocene hominins. J. Hum. Evol. 47, 183-198.
Barriel, V., 1997. Pan paniscus and hominoid phy-logeny: morphological data, molecular data and “total evidence.” Folia Primatol. 68, 50-56. Bjorklund, D.F., 1997. The role of immaturity in human development. Psychol. Bull. 122, 153-169.
Bookstein, F.L., 1989. “Size” and “shape”: a comment on semantics. Syst. Zool. 38, 173-180.
Bookstein, F.L., 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Churchill, S.E., 1998. Cold adaptation, heterochrony, and Neandertals. Evol. Anthropol. 7, 46-61.
Cobb, S.N., O’Higgins, P., 2004. Hominins do not share a common postnatal facial ontogenetic shape trajectory. J. Exp. Zool. B (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 302, 302-321.
D’Aout, K., Vereecke, E., Schoonaert, K., De Clercq, D., Van Elsacker, L., Aerts, P., 2004. Locomotion in bonobos (Pan paniscus): differences and similarities between bipedal and quadrupedal terrestrial walking, and a comparison with other locomotor modes. J. Anat. 204, 353-361.
Dean, M.C., Wood, B.A., 1984. Phylogeny, neoteny and growth of the cranial base in hominoids. Folia Primatol. 43, 157-180.
Doran, D.M., 1993. Comparative locomotor behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos: the influence of morphology on locomotion. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 91, 83-98.
Dryden, I.L., Mardia, K., 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. Wiley, New York.
Franciscus, R.G., 1999. Neandertal nasal structures and upper respiratory tract “specialization”. Proc. Natl. Acad.Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 1805-1809.
Franciscus, R.G., 2003. Internal nasal floor configura-tion in Homo with special reference to the evo-lution of Neandertal facial form. J. Hum. Evol. 44, 701-729.
Franciscus, R.G., Churchill, S.E., 2002. The costal skeleton of Shanidar 3 and a reappraisal of Neandertal thoracic morphology. J. Hum. Evol. 42, 303-356.
Gagneux, P., Wills, C., Gerloff, U., Tautz, D., Morin, P.A., Boesch, C., Fruth, B., Hohmann, G., Ryder, O.A., Woodruff, D.S.,1999. Mitochondrial sequences show diverse evolu-tionary histories of African hominoids. Proc. Natl. Acad.Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5077-5082.
Godfrey, L.R., Sutherland, M.R., 1995. Flawed infer-ence: why size-based tests of heterochronic processes do not work. J. Theor. Biol. 172, 43-61.
Godfrey, L.R., Sutherland, M.R., 1996. Paradox of per-amorphic paedomorphosis: heterochrony and human evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 99, 17-42.
Godfrey, L.R., King, S.J., Sutherland, M.R., 1998.Heterochronic approaches to the study of loco-motion. In: Strasser, S. (Ed.), Primate Locomotion. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 277-307.
Golovanova, L.V., Hoffecker, J.F., Kharitonov, V.M., Romanova, G.P., 1999. Mezmaiskaya cave: A Neanderthal occupation in the Northern Caucasus. Curr. Anthropol. 40, 77-86.
Gould, S.J., 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gould, S.J., 2000. Of coiled oysters and big brains: how to rescue the terminology of heterochrony, now gone astray. Evol. Dev. 2, 241-248.
Gould, S.J., Lewontin, R.C., 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205, 581-598.
Guatelli-Steinberg, D., Reid, D.J., Bishop, T.A., Larsen, C.S., 2005. Anterior tooth growth periods in Neandertals were comparable to those of mod-ern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 14197-14202.
Harvati, K., 2003. The Neanderthal taxonomic posi-tion: models of intra-and inter-specific cranio-facial variation. J. Hum. Evol. 44, 107-132.
Harvati, K., Frost, S.R., McNulty, K.P., 2004. Neanderthal taxonomy reconsidered: implica-tions of 3D primate models of intra-and inter-specific differences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 1147-1152.
Ishida, H., Kondo, O., Muhesen, S.Akazawa, T., 2000. A new Neanderthal child recovered at Dederiyeh Cave, Syria, in 1997–1998. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 30, 186-187.
Jolliffe, I.T., 1986. Principal Component Analysis. Springer, Berlin.
Klingenberg, C.P., 1998. Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 73, 79-123.
Kondo, O., Dodo, Y., 2000. Estimation of stature from the skeletal reconstruction of an immature Neandertal from Dederiyeh Cave, Syria. J. Hum. Evol. 38, 457-473.
Krings, M., Stone, A., Schmitz, R.W., Krainitzki, H., Stoneking, M., Pääbo, S., 1997. Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans. Cell 90, 19-30.
Krings, M., Geisert, H., Schmitz, R.W., Krainitzki, H., Pääbo, S., 1999. DNA sequence of the mito-chondrial hypervariable region II from the Neandertal type specimen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5581-5585.
Krings, M., Capelli, C., Tschentscher, F., Geisert, H., Meyer, S., von Haeseler, A., Grossschmidt, K., Possnert, G., Paunovic, M., Pääbo, S., 2000. A view of Neandertal genetic diversity. Nat. Genet. 26, 144-146.
Krovitz, G.E., 2000. Three-dimensional comparisons of craniofacial morphology and growth patterns in Neandertals and modern humans. Ph.D. Dissertation. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
Krovitz, G.E., 2003. Shape and growth differences between Neanderthals and modern humans: grounds for a species level distinction. In: Thompson, J., Krovitz, G., Nelson, A., (Eds.), Patterns of Growth and Development in the Genus Homo. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 320-342.
Lele, S., Richtsmeier, J., 2001. An Invariant Approach to the Statistical Analysis of Shapes. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FL.
Lieberman, D.E., Carlo, J.O.S., Ponce de León, M.S., Zollikofer, C.P.E., 2007. A geometric morpho-metric analysis of heterochrony in the cranium of chimpanzees and bonobos. J. Juman. Evol. 52, 647-662.
O’Connor, C.F., Franciscus, R.G., Holton, N.E., 2005. Bite force production capability and efficiency in Neandertals and modern humans. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 127, 129-51.
Ovchinnikov, I.V., Gotherstrom, A., Romanova, G.P., Kharitonov, V.M., Liden, K., Goodwin, W., 2000. Molecular analysis of Neanderthal DNA from the northern Caucasus. Nature 404,490–493.
Parish, A.R., De Waal, F.B., 2000. The other “closest living relative”. How bonobos (Pan paniscus) challenge traditional assumptions about females, dominance, intra-and intersexual inter-actions, and hominid evolution. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 907, 97-113.
Penin, X., Berge, C., Baylac, M., 2002. Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional Procrustes analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 118, 50-62.
Ponce de León, M.S., Zollikofer, C.P.E., 2001. Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implica-tions for late hominid diversity. Nature 412, 534-538.
Poti, P., 2005. Chimpanzees’ constructional praxis (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes). Primates 46, 103-113.
Rak, Y., 1986. The Neanderthal: a new look at an old face. J. Hum. Evol. 15, 151-164.
Ramirez Rozzi, F.V., Bermudez De Castro, J.M., 2004. Surprisingly rapid growth in Neanderthals. Nature 428, 936-939.
Rogers Ackermann, R., Krovitz, G.E., 2002. Common patterns of facial ontogeny in the hominid line-age. Anat. Rec. 269, 142-147.
Rohlf, F.J., Slice, D., 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of land-marks. Syst. Zool. 39, 40-59.
Sept, J., 1998. Shadows on a changing landscape: com-paring nesting patterns of hominids and chim-panzees since their last common ancestor. Am. J. Primatol. 46, 85-101.
Serre, D., Langaney, A., Chech, M., Teschler-Nicola, M., Paunovic, M., Mennecier, P., Hofreiter, M., Possnert, G.G., Paabo, S., 2004. No evidence of Neandertal mtDNA contribution to early mod-ern humans. PLoS Biol. 2, E57.
Shea, B.T., 1983. Paedomorphosis and neoteny in the pygmy chimpanzee. Science 222, 521-522.
She a, B.T., 1984. An allometric perspective on the mor-pholo gical and evolutionary relationships between pygmy (Pan paniscus) and common (Pan troglodytes) chimpanzees. In: Susman, R.L. (Ed.), The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 89-130.
Shea, B.T., 1988. Heterochrony in primates. In: McKinney, M.L. (Ed.), Heterochrony in Evolution: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 237-266.
Shea, B.T., 1989. Heterochrony in human evolution: the case for neoteny reconsidered. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol. 32, 69-101.
Smith, K.K., 2002. Sequence heterochrony and the evo-lution of development. J. Morphol. 252, 82-97.
Stringer, C.B., Gamble, C., 1993. In Search of the Neanderthals: Solving the Puzzle of Human Origins. Thames and Hudson, London.
Susman, R.L., (Ed.) 1984. The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior. Plenum Press, New York.
Trinkaus, E., 1987. The Neandertal face: evolutionary and functional perspectives on a recent hominid face. J. Hum. Evol. 16, 429-443.
Trinkaus, E., 2003. Neandertal faces were not long; modern human faces are short. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8142-8145.
Verhulst, J., 1999. Bolkian and Bokian retardation in Homo sapiens. Acta Biotheor. 47, 7-28.
Vidarsdottir, U.S., O’Higgins, P., Stringer, C., 2002. A geometric morphometric study of regional dif-ferences in the ontogeny of the modern human facial skeleton. J. Anat. 201, 211-229.
Williams, F.L., 2000. Heterochrony and the human fossil record: comparing Neandertal and modern human craniofacial ontogeny. In: Stringer, C.B., Barton, R.N.E., Finlayson, J.C. (Eds.), Neanderthals on the Edge. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp. 257-267.
Williams, F.L., Godfrey, L.R., Sutherland, M.R., 2002. Heterochrony and the evolution of Neandertal and modern human craniofacial form. In: Minugh-Purvis, N., McNamara, K. (Eds.), Human Evolution through Developmental Change. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 405-441.
Williams, F.L., Godfrey, L.R., Sutherland, M.R., 2003. Diagnosing heterochronic perturbations in the craniofacial evolution of Homo (Neanderthals and modern humans) and Pan (Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus). In: Thompson, J., Krovitz, G., Nelson, A. (Eds.), Patterns of Growth and Development in the Genus Homo. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 295-319.
Won, Y.J., Hey, J., 2005. Divergence population genet-ics of chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 297-307.
Yu, N., Jensen-Seaman, M.I., Chemnick, L., Kidd, J.R., Deinard, A.S., Ryder, O., Kidd, K.K., Li, W.H., 2003. Low nucleotide diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Genetics 164, 1511-1518.
Zihlman, A.L., Cramer, D.L., 1978. Skeletal differences between pygmy (Pan paniscus) and common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Folia Primatol. 29, 86-94.
Zollikofer, C.P.E., Ponce de León, M.S., 2002. Visualizing patterns of craniofacial shape varia-tion in Homo sapiens. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 801-807.
Zollikofer, C.P.E., Ponce de León, M.S., 2004. Kinematics of cranial ontogeny: Heterotopy, heterochrony, and geometric morphometric analysis of growth models. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 302B, 322-340.
Zollikofer, C.P.E., Ponce de León, M.S., 2005. Virtual Reconstruction: A Primer in Computer-assisted Paleontology and Biomedicine. Wiley, New York.
Zollikofer, C.P.E., Ponce de León, M., Ishida, H., Suzuki, H., Kobayashi, Y., Tsuchiya, K., Akazawa, T., 2002. Computer-assisted recon-struction of the Dederiyeh Neanderthal infants. I: cranium and mandible. In: Ishida, H., Nakatsukasa, M., Ogiwara, N. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Physical Anthropology and Primatology. Kinsei-sha, Kyoto, pp. 35-40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De León, M.S.P., Zollikofer, C.P.E. (2006). Neanderthals and modern humans — chimps and bonobos: similarities and differences in development and evolution. In: Hublin, JJ., Harvati, K., Harrison, T. (eds) Neanderthals Revisited: New Approaches and Perspectives. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5121-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5121-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5120-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5121-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)