Advertisement

CURVED NON FERROUS REINFORCEMENT FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURES

  • M. Guadagnini
  • T. Imjai
  • K. Pilakoutas
Conference paper

Abstract

The mechanical properties of composite reinforcing elements differ from those of conventional steel rebars in a number of ways. As a result, several issues need to be taken into account when designing concrete elements reinforced with composite reinforcement. For example, it has been proven experimentally that the capacity of curved composite elements can be considerably lower than that of their straight counterparts. This paper reports on an experimental study that was carried out at the University of Sheffield to investigate the capacity of curved composite reinforcing elements. Direct pull-out tests were performed on thermoplastic composite strips embedded in concrete cubes. A total of 47 specimens and 19 different configurations were tested. The parameters that were investigated included geometry of the bend, surface treatment, embedment length and concrete strength. This paper presents the preliminary findings of this experimental investigation as concerns the problems related to the use and performance of curved FRP bars in concrete.

Keywords

Fiber Reinforce Polymer High Strength Concrete American Concrete Institute Normal Strength Concrete Embedment Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Federal Highway Administration, “The Status of the Nation’s Highway Bridges: Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program and National Bridge Inventory,” Thirteenth Report to the United States Congress, Washington, D. C (1997).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morphy, R., Sheata, E., and Rizkalla, S., “Bent Effect on Strength of CFRP Stirrups”, Third International Symposium on Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, Sapporo, Japan, 19–26 (1997).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sheata, E., Morphy, R. and Rizkalla, S., “Fibre Reinforced Polymer Shear Reinforcement for Concrete Members: Behaviour and Design Guidelines”, Can. J. Civ. Eng./Rev. can. génie civ. 27(5), 859–872 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    British Standards Institution, Specification for Scheduling, Dimensioning, Bending and Cutting of Steel Reinforcement for Concrete, BS8666:2000, BSI, London (2000).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Concrete Institute (ACI), “Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary ACI 318–05/R-05”, ACI Committee 318, Farmington Hills, MI, USA. (2005).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ehsani, M. R., Saadatmanesh, H., and Tao, S., “Bond of Hooked Glass Fiber Reinorced Plastic (GFRP) Reinforcing Bars to Concrete” Materials Journal, 122(3), 247–257 (1995).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maruyama, T., Honma, M., and Okamura, H., “Experimental Study on the Diagonal Tensile Characteristics of Various Fiber Reinforced Plastic Rods.” Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute, 11, 193–198 (1989).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mochizuki, S., Matsuzaki, Y., and Sugita, M., “Evaluation Items and Methods of FRP Reinforcement as Structural Elements.” Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute, 11, 117–131 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nagasaka, T., Fukuyama, H., and Tanigaki, M., “Shear Performance of Concrete Beams Reinforced with FRP Stirrups.” Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute, 11 (1989).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Japan Society of Civil Engineering, “Recommendation for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures using Continuous Fiber Reinforcing Materials”, JSCE, Tokyo, Japan (1996).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    American Concrete Institute (ACI), “Guide for the Design and Construction of Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars ACI 440.1R-03”, ACI Committee 440, Farmington Hills, MI, USA (2003).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISIS Canada (ISIS), “Manual No. 3—Reinforcing Concrete Structures with Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRPs)”, ISIS Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (2001).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Institution of Structural Engineers (ISE), “Interim Guidance on the Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using Fibre Composite Reinforcement”, IStructE, SETO Ltd., London (1999).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Canadian Standards Association (CSA), “Canadian Highways Bridge Design Code, Section 16—Fibre Reinforced Structures” (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Guadagnini
    • 1
  • T. Imjai
    • 1
  • K. Pilakoutas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Structural EngineeringThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations