CONCRETE STRENGTH PREDICTION IN STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS MADE WITH PULVERISED FUEL ASH
Two maturity functions, the Nurse-Saul and one based on the Arrhenius equation have been examined to determine their applicability for in-situ strength prediction of concretes made with pulverised fuel ash (PFA). Results from a PFA concrete mix with 30% of its binder being PFA were compared to a Portland cement concrete mix with similar 28-day target mean strength. The strength development of these two concretes in a block (1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5m) and a wall (3 × 2 × 0.3m) was determined.
KeywordsSteam Polythene Lime Compaction Polystyrene
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.S. J. Barnett, M. N. Soutsos, J. H. Bungey and S. G. Millard, Fast Track Concrete Construction using Cement Replacement Materials, SP-221–7: Eighth CANMET/ACI International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, 2004Google Scholar
- 2.British Standards Institution, BS EN 12390–2:2000, Testing hardened concrete—Part 2: Making and curing specimens for strength tests, 2000Google Scholar
- 3.V. M. Malhotra and N. J. Carino NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF CONCRET” Chapter 5 The Maturity Method, pp 5-1–5-47Google Scholar
- 4.DTI, The Concrete Society Project Report 13, In situ Concrete Strength, Investigation into the relationship between core strength and standard cube strength, reported by working party of the Concrete Society.Google Scholar
- 5.The Met Office web site, Climate Averages—long-term averages, http://www.metoffice. gov.uk/climate/uk/averages.Google Scholar
- 6.A.G.A Saul, Principles underlying the steam curing of concrete at atmospheric pressure, Magazine of Concrete Research, 2(6), 1951, pp. 127Google Scholar
- 7.Hansen P. F. and Pedersen, J., Maturity computer for controlled curing and hardening of concrete, Nordisk Betong, V. 1, 1977, pp. 19–34Google Scholar