abstract
The present study deals with a school-based in-service course for science teachers, aiming at guiding teachers how to scaffold students’ open-inquiry learning for the topic of water quality. Seven experienced science teachers were involved in the study. Before teaching, the teachers developed several intentions for scaffolding, such as bringing students in a short initial stage of uncertainty regarding the issue how to design a realistic research question and plan, followed by a stage of classroom discussion and useful hints. They also wanted to make go/no-go decisions regularly, and to discuss their decisions with them for reflection purposes. In the classroom, in general, the teachers taught as intended, but some specific deviations were noted. After teaching, the teachers reported to have learnt a lot from their teaching practice, especially regarding scaffolding students by giving them a well-balanced combination of ‘space’ for own contributions at one moment and ‘direction’ at another moment. The implications for science teacher education are identified on the basis of the findings
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cochran, K.F., DeRuiter, J.A. & King, R.A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowledge: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263–272.
De Jong, O., Korthagen, F. & Wubbels, T. (1998). Research on science teachers education in Europe: teacher thinking and conceptual change. In B. Frazer & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 745–758). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gallagher, J.J. & Tobin, K. (1987). Teacher management and student engagement in high school science. Science Education, 71, 535–555.
Janesick, V.J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Design (2nd edition; pp. 379–399). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Linn, M.C. (1998). The impact of technology on science instruction: historical trends and current opportunities. In: B.J. Frazer & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 265–294). Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Loughran, J.J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R. & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31, 289–307.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic School Science: Knowing and Learning in Open-inquiry Science Laboratories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D.J. & Gallard, A.J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 45–93). New York: Macmillan.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jong, O.d., Valk, A.v. (2007). Science Teachers’ PCK and Teaching Practice: Learning to Scaffold Students’ Open-inquiry Learning. In: Pintó, R., Couso, D. (eds) Contributions from Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5031-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5032-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)