abstract
The chapter describes a theory-driven study, inspired and informed by the constructivist view of learning, science literacy theory, views on the NOS, and cognitive and social theories of writing. Relying on the epistemological effect of writing, it explores the effects that non-traditional forms of writing such as story, diary, and debate, have on students’ views on the nature of science when used in combination with reflective writing on the writing process. Using a pre-post research design with intervention and comparative groups totaling 97 eighth graders from a homogenous, middle-class background, in a city in central Israel, the study demonstrates that the combined use of diversified types of nontraditional writing tasks and reflection on the writing process can enhance students’ views on the nature of science, in a direction aligned with the type of scientific literacy sought in science education today. When structured as cognitively and attitudinally challenging assignments concerning scientific and societal issues, such writing genres can encourage students to perceive science as a more subjective, temporary, speculative, and interpretative endeavor that helps to solve problems and social issues. In contrast, no changes in views on the NOS were found for students in the comparative group
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in pre-service elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but{\ldots} Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 215–233
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning about nature of science as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of pre-service elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88(5), 785–810
Bereiter, C. (1980). Development in writing. (In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in Writing (pp. 73–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.)
BouJaoude, S. (1996). Lebanese students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. (In: M. Debs (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Scientific Conference on the Future of Science and Mathematics Teaching and the Needs of Arab Society (pp. 283– 303). Beirut: Arab Development Institute.)
Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28, 235–251
Craven, J. A., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2002). Assessing explicit and tacit conceptions of the nature of science among pre service elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 785–802
DiSessa, A. A. (2002). Why conceptual ecology is a good idea. (In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice (pp. 29–60). Dordrecht: Kluwer.)
Fleener, M. J. (1996). Scientific world building on the edge of chaos: High school students’ beliefs about mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 96(6), 312–319
Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151–183
Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing-in-science framework designed to improve science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1021–1035
Hand, B., & Treagust, D. (2004, April) Linking Pedagogical Requirements to Cognition and Literacy When Using Writing to Learn Strategies. (Symposium on contemporary international issues facing science literacy: Classrooms and beyond. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, Canada)
Hildebrand, G. M. (1999). Breaking the Pedagogic Contract: Teachers’ and Students’ Voices. (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston)
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140
Keys, C. W. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115–130
Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition and epistemic cognition. A three level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technology, 2nd edn. (London: Routlege Farmer)
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359
Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without content. [Electronic version]. Science Education, 3(2), 1–12
Lederman, N.G., Abol-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Schwartz, R.S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful Assessment of learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521
Lederman, N. G., Wade, P. D., & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing the nature of science: What is the nature of our assessment? Science Education, 7, 595–615
Marshall, J. D. (1987). The effects of writing on students’ understanding of literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 30–63
Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2004). Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 103–128
McComas, W. F. (Ed.) (1998). The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. (In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationals and Strategies (pp. 41–52). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.)
Meyling, H. (1997). How to change students’ conceptions of the epistemology of science. Science and Education, 6, 397–416
Milian, M., & Camps, A. (2005). Writing and the making of meaning: An introduction. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5(3), 241–249
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. London: King’s College London/Nuffield Foundation.
Moscovici, S. (1993). Towards a social psychology of science. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 23, 343–374
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. (Washington, DC: National Academy Press)
OECD/PISA. (2003, December). Pisa Scientific Literacy Framework Doc: NPM (0132)18. (Paper presented in the National Project Managers Meeting, Prague)
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas about science” should be taught in school? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720
Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1999). Students’ perceptions of writing for learning in secondary school science. Science Education, 83, 151–162
Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students’ images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201–219
Sandoval, W. A. (2003). The inquiry paradox: Why doing science doesn’t necessarily change ideas about science. (In C. P. Constantinou & Z. C. Zacharia (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Computer-Based Learning in Science Conference (pp. 825–834). Nicosia: Cyprus.)
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry [Electronic version]. Science Education, 89, 634–656. Published on line 27 May 2005 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com)
Sandoval, W. A., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students’ ideas about theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 692–720
Schwonke, A., & Renkl, A. (2005). The use of net-mediated environments for collaborative writing-to-learn. (In A. Méndez Vilas, B. G. Pereira, J. M. González & J. A. M. González (Eds.), Recent Research Developments in Learning Technologies (Vol. 3, pp. 1239–1243). Badajoz: Formatex 2005.)
Simpson, R.D., Kobala, T.R., Oliven, Y.S. and Crawley, F.E. (1994). Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, chapter 6, New York: Macmillan
Smith, C. L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students’ epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 349–422
Sutton, C. (1996) Beliefs about science and beliefs about language. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 1–18
Tolhurst, D. (2004). The influence of web-supported independent activities and small group work on students’ epistemological beliefs. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Australian Computing Education, 30, 311–316 (Dunedin, New Zealand)
Tucknott, J., & Yore, L. (1999, March). The Effects of Writing Activities on Grade 4 Children’s Understandings of Simple Machines, Inventions and Inventors. (Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston)
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69
Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1213–1230
Yore, L., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2002). Scientists as writers. Science Education, 86(5), 672–692
Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 689–725
Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., & Florence, .M .K (2004). Scientists’ views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 338–369
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wagner, T., Levin, T. (2007). Developing Students’ Views on the Nature of Science through Non-traditional Writing-to-Learn Experiences in the Science Classroom. In: Pintó, R., Couso, D. (eds) Contributions from Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5031-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5032-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)