Skip to main content

A History of E-Learning

Echoes of the pioneers

  • Chapter
Computers and Education

Abstract

In many contemporary sectors, E-learning is often regarded as a ‘new’ form of learning that uses the affordances of the Internet to deliver customized, often interactive, learning materials and programs to diverse local and distant communities of practice. This view, however, is historically disconnected from its antecedent instantiations, failing to recognize the extensive links between developing educational theories and practices that had shaped the use of E-learning over the past 40 years. In addition, the historic divide between Education and Training has led to both the concurrent development of different notions, foci, and labels for technology-enhanced learning in different contexts and situations, and different conceptual origins arising in acquisitive and participatory learning metaphors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bitzer, D. L., Braunfeld, P. G., et al. (1962). PLATO II: A multiple-student, computer-controlled, automatic teaching device. In J. E. Coulson (Ed.), Programmed learning and computer-based instruction (pp. 205-216). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2-sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective a one-on-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L. (2004). What does the “e” stand for? (Report). Melbourne: Department of Science and Mathematics Education. The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charp, S. (1997). Some reflections. (the 30-year history of computers in education). T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 24(1), 8-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. D. (2002). is it worth it? Some comments on reearch and technology in assessment and instruction. Technology and Assessment: Thinking Ahead. Proceedings from a Workshop (2002) Retrieved 07/07, 2006, from http://darwin.nap.edu/books/ 0309083206/html/26.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. D., & Rockway, M. R. (1986). Computer-based training in the military. In J. A. Ellis (Ed.), Military contributions to instructional technology (pp. 177-222). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, G. (1988). Constructivism in the Computer Age. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L. (1999, November 17). Next, It’s E-ducation. New York Times, p. 25 (Section A).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, D. (2002). Web resource appraisal process (WRAP): A framework to establish critically appraised nursing knowledge–an active web based learning exercise. Nurse Education in Practice, 2(4), 257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I. (Ed.). (1991). Children designers: Interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., Reeves, T., et al. (2005). Online Learning as Information Delivery: Digital Myopia. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 353-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, K. P. (2002). Identifying success in online teacher education and professional development. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinonen, T. (2005). (Critical) history of ICT in education - and where we are heading? [Electronic Version]. FLOSSE Posse. Free, Libre and Open Source Software in Education, 23 June. Retrieved 31-08-2006 from underline http://flosse.dicole.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, A., & Betts, J. (1997). Learning with the media of their time: a snapshot of infrastructure, policy and practice in a technology immersion school. Melbourne: Computing in Education Group of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGorry, S. Y. (2003). Measuring quality in online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(2), 159-177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, A. (1997). Computers in education: a brief history. T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 24(11), 63-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortera-Gutièrrez, F. (2006). Faculty Best Practices Using Blended Learning in E-Learning and Face-to-Face Instruction. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(3), 313-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. (Ed.). (1996).Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, P. S. (2004). E-Training or E-Learning? Towards a synthesis for the knowledge-era workplace. In P. S. Nicholson, Thompson, J., Ruhonen, M., Mulitsilta, J (Ed.), elearning solutions for professional organizations (pp. 360). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, P. S., & McDougall, A. (2005). eLearning: 40 Years of Evolution? In IFIP (Ed.), The eighth IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education [ISI 1571-5736]. Stellenbosch, ZA: IFIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social Constructivist Perspectives on Teaching and Learning. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou, K. A., Grigoriadou, M., et al. (2002). Towards new forms of knowledge communication: the adaptive dimension of a web-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 39(4), 333-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilla, B. S., Nakayama, M. K., et al. (in press). Characterising E-learning practices. In Proceedings of WCC2002, Santiago, Chile, July 2006 [ISSN: 1571-5736]. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, D. (1959). Some effects of year long teaching machine instruction. In E. Galanter (Ed.), Automatic teaching: The state of the art (pp. 85-90). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, M. (1996). Distributed Constructionism. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), International Conference on the Learning Sciences: Proceedings of ICLS96, Evanston, IL July 25-27, 1996 (pp. 280-284). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgway, J., & Passey, D. (1991). A Constructivist Approach to Educational Computing. Australian Educational Computing,, 6(2), 4-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002, Jan 7-11). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change CSCL. Paper presented at the CSCL2002: Computer Supported Collaborative Work, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, U., & Spannagel, C. (2006). Supporting the Active Learning Process. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(2), 245-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone Wiske, M., Sick, M., et al. (2001). New technologies to support teaching for understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Tzu. (410bc). The Art of War.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1966). The uses of computers in education. Scientific American, 215(206-220).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1986). Computers and education in the 21st century. In W. Neilson & C. Gaffield (Eds.), Universities in Crisis: A mediaeval institution in the twenty-first century (pp. 137-151). Toronto: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D., Hundhausen, C. D., et al. (2003). Comparing the roles of representations in face-to-face and online computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 41(4), 335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, F. M. (2006). Quotes about History. from http://hnn.us/articles/1328.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (Ed.). (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. NY: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMSON. (2005). History of E-Learning. from http://www.knowledgenet.com/ corporateinformation/ourhistory/history.jsp

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, W. R. (1962). On conversational interaction. In J. E. Coulson (Ed.), Programmed learning andcomputer-based instruction (pp. 171-190). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, McDermott, et al. Cultivating Communities of Practise: A guide to Managing Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, D. R. (1994). PLATO: The Emergence of Online Community. Retrieved 30/12, 2004, from http://www.thinkofit.com/plato/dwplato.htm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicholson, P. (2007). A History of E-Learning. In: Fernández-Manjón, B., Sánchez-Pérez, J.M., Gómez-Pulido, J.A., Vega-Rodríguez, M.A., Bravo-Rodríguez, J. (eds) Computers and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4914-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics