A History of E-Learning

Echoes of the pioneers


In many contemporary sectors, E-learning is often regarded as a ‘new’ form of learning that uses the affordances of the Internet to deliver customized, often interactive, learning materials and programs to diverse local and distant communities of practice. This view, however, is historically disconnected from its antecedent instantiations, failing to recognize the extensive links between developing educational theories and practices that had shaped the use of E-learning over the past 40 years. In addition, the historic divide between Education and Training has led to both the concurrent development of different notions, foci, and labels for technology-enhanced learning in different contexts and situations, and different conceptual origins arising in acquisitive and participatory learning metaphors.


E-learning history theory practice 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bitzer, D. L., Braunfeld, P. G., et al. (1962). PLATO II: A multiple-student, computer-controlled, automatic teaching device. In J. E. Coulson (Ed.), Programmed learning and computer-based instruction (pp. 205-216). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2-sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective a one-on-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, L. (2004). What does the “e” stand for? (Report). Melbourne: Department of Science and Mathematics Education. The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  4. Charp, S. (1997). Some reflections. (the 30-year history of computers in education). T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 24(1), 8-11.Google Scholar
  5. Fletcher, J. D. (2002). is it worth it? Some comments on reearch and technology in assessment and instruction. Technology and Assessment: Thinking Ahead. Proceedings from a Workshop (2002) Retrieved 07/07, 2006, from 0309083206/html/26.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. Fletcher, J. D., & Rockway, M. R. (1986). Computer-based training in the military. In J. A. Ellis (Ed.), Military contributions to instructional technology (pp. 177-222). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  7. Forman, G. (1988). Constructivism in the Computer Age. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, T. L. (1999, November 17). Next, It’s E-ducation. New York Times, p. 25 (Section A).Google Scholar
  9. Gillham, D. (2002). Web resource appraisal process (WRAP): A framework to establish critically appraised nursing knowledge–an active web based learning exercise. Nurse Education in Practice, 2(4), 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harel, I. (Ed.). (1991). Children designers: Interdisciplinary constructions for learning and knowing mathematics in a computer-rich school. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.Google Scholar
  11. Herrington, J., Reeves, T., et al. (2005). Online Learning as Information Delivery: Digital Myopia. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 353-367.Google Scholar
  12. King, K. P. (2002). Identifying success in online teacher education and professional development. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leinonen, T. (2005). (Critical) history of ICT in education - and where we are heading? [Electronic Version]. FLOSSE Posse. Free, Libre and Open Source Software in Education, 23 June. Retrieved 31-08-2006 from underline Scholar
  14. McDougall, A., & Betts, J. (1997). Learning with the media of their time: a snapshot of infrastructure, policy and practice in a technology immersion school. Melbourne: Computing in Education Group of Victoria.Google Scholar
  15. McGorry, S. Y. (2003). Measuring quality in online programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(2), 159-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Molnar, A. (1997). Computers in education: a brief history. T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 24(11), 63-69.Google Scholar
  17. Mortera-Gutièrrez, F. (2006). Faculty Best Practices Using Blended Learning in E-Learning and Face-to-Face Instruction. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(3), 313-337.Google Scholar
  18. Nardi, B. (Ed.). (1996).Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Nicholson, P. S. (2004). E-Training or E-Learning? Towards a synthesis for the knowledge-era workplace. In P. S. Nicholson, Thompson, J., Ruhonen, M., Mulitsilta, J (Ed.), elearning solutions for professional organizations (pp. 360). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Nicholson, P. S., & McDougall, A. (2005). eLearning: 40 Years of Evolution? In IFIP (Ed.), The eighth IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education [ISI 1571-5736]. Stellenbosch, ZA: IFIP.Google Scholar
  21. Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social Constructivist Perspectives on Teaching and Learning. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Papanikolaou, K. A., Grigoriadou, M., et al. (2002). Towards new forms of knowledge communication: the adaptive dimension of a web-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 39(4), 333-360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pilla, B. S., Nakayama, M. K., et al. (in press). Characterising E-learning practices. In Proceedings of WCC2002, Santiago, Chile, July 2006 [ISSN: 1571-5736]. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Porter, D. (1959). Some effects of year long teaching machine instruction. In E. Galanter (Ed.), Automatic teaching: The state of the art (pp. 85-90). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Resnick, M. (1996). Distributed Constructionism. In D. C. Edelson & E. A. Domeshek (Eds.), International Conference on the Learning Sciences: Proceedings of ICLS96, Evanston, IL July 25-27, 1996 (pp. 280-284). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.Google Scholar
  26. Ridgway, J., & Passey, D. (1991). A Constructivist Approach to Educational Computing. Australian Educational Computing,, 6(2), 4-9.Google Scholar
  27. Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002, Jan 7-11). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change CSCL. Paper presented at the CSCL2002: Computer Supported Collaborative Work, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  28. Schroeder, U., & Spannagel, C. (2006). Supporting the Active Learning Process. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(2), 245-264.Google Scholar
  29. Stone Wiske, M., Sick, M., et al. (2001). New technologies to support teaching for understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun Tzu. (410bc). The Art of War.Google Scholar
  31. Suppes, P. (1966). The uses of computers in education. Scientific American, 215(206-220).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Suppes, P. (1986). Computers and education in the 21st century. In W. Neilson & C. Gaffield (Eds.), Universities in Crisis: A mediaeval institution in the twenty-first century (pp. 137-151). Toronto: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
  33. Suthers, D. D., Hundhausen, C. D., et al. (2003). Comparing the roles of representations in face-to-face and online computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 41(4), 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Szasz, F. M. (2006). Quotes about History. from Scholar
  35. Taylor, R. (Ed.). (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. NY: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  36. THOMSON. (2005). History of E-Learning. from corporateinformation/ourhistory/history.jspGoogle Scholar
  37. Uttal, W. R. (1962). On conversational interaction. In J. E. Coulson (Ed.), Programmed learning andcomputer-based instruction (pp. 171-190). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Wenger, McDermott, et al. Cultivating Communities of Practise: A guide to Managing Knowledge.Google Scholar
  39. Woolley, D. R. (1994). PLATO: The Emergence of Online Community. Retrieved 30/12, 2004, from Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education, Deakin University, 221 Burwood HighwayBurwoodAustralia 3125

Personalised recommendations