Comparing Landscape and Infrastructural Heterogeneity within and between Ecosystems

  • Randall B. Boone
  • Shauna B. BurnSilver
  • Russell S. Kruska

Ecological research throughout much of the last century focused upon manipulative experiments on areas of a few square meters or less (Kareiva and Andersen 1988). The last quarter of the century saw the development of landscape ecology and the emergence of macroecology as a bonafide method of research and discovery (e.g., Brown 1995, Blackburn and Gaston 2002). Geographical and human-ecological research increasingly has successfully integrated human populations and their behaviors into analyses of land use change (Rindfuss and Stern 1998). Today, readily available broad-scale data, such as satellite images and global spatial databases, make comparing attributes of landscapes and the people who inhabit them uniform, thorough, repeatable, and relatively inexpensive (Roughgarden et al. 1991).


Land Cover Normalize Difference Vegetation Index Gross Domestic Product United Nations Development Program Veterinary Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2006. Latest regional profile by location name (Main Areas).
  2. Adelzadeh, A., C. Alvillar, G. Mhone, H. Bhorat, M. Leibbrandt, et al. 2003. South Africa: The challenge of sustainable development. Human Development Report. United Nations Development Program: 295.Google Scholar
  3. ADF (African Development Fund). 2003. Kenya: ASAL-Based Livestock and Rural Liveli-hoods Support Project, Agriculture and Rural Development Department North, East and South Regions. Appraisal Report 2006.
  4. Akcura, F., S. Zhusupov, Y. Shokamanov, Z. Mukhamedkarmova, E. Gossen, et al. 2002. Rural development in Kazakhstan: Challenges and prospects. Human Development Report. United Nations Development Program Almaty, 123.Google Scholar
  5. Ash, A., J. Gross, and M. Stafford-Smith. 2004. Scale, heterogeneity and secondary production in tropical rangelands. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 21:137-15.Google Scholar
  6. Beutler, M.K. 2003. Impact of South Dakota agriculture 2002. South Dakota State University, Brookings.Google Scholar
  7. Blackburn, T.M. and K.J. Gaston. 2002. Scale in macroecology. Global Ecology & Biogeography 11:185-189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blench, R. 2001. ‘You can’t go home again’: pastoralism in the new millennium. London, Overseas Development Institute: 103.Google Scholar
  9. Boone, R.B. and N.T. Hobbs. 2004. Lines around fragments: effects of fragmentation on large herbivores. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 21:79-90.Google Scholar
  10. Boone, R.B., S.B. BurnSilver, P.K. Thornton, J.S. Worden, and K.A. Galvin. 2005. Quantifying declines in livestock due to land subdivision in Kajiado District, Kenya. Rangeland Ecology & Management 58:523-532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, J.H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  12. BurnSilver, S., R.B. Boone, and K.A. Galvin. 2003. Linking pastoralists to a heterogeneous landscape: The case of four Maasai group ranches in Kajiado District, Kenya. Pages 173-200. In: J. Fox, V. Mishra, R. Rindfuss, and S. Walsh, editors. People and the environment: approaches for linking household and community surveys to remote sensing and GIS. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Boston.Google Scholar
  13. CIESEN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network). 2005. Earth Institute at Columbia University.
  14. Dadibhavi, R.V. and L.D. Vaikunthe. 1990. Infrastructure for rural development - A study of Regional Disparities. Journal of Rural Development 9:581-593.Google Scholar
  15. DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries). 2005. Australian Government Drought Assistance Programs.
  16. De Haan, C., H. Steinfeld, and H. Blackburn. 1997. Livestock and the environment: finding a balance. Commission of the European Communities, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and the World Bank, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  17. Desta, S. and D.L. Coppock. 2004. Pastoralism under pressure: tracking system change in southern Ethiopia. Human Ecology 32:465-486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Desta, S., D.L. Coppock, S. Tereza, and F. Lelo. 2004. Pastoral risk management in southern Ethiopia: Observations from pilot projects based on participatory community assessments. University of California, Davis, Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support Program: 4.Google Scholar
  19. de Wolff, T., S. Staal, Kruska, R., Ouma, E., Thornton, P. and W. Thorpe. 2000. Improving GIS derived measures of farm market access: an application to milk markets in the East African highlands. Fifth Seminar on GIS and Developing Countries, Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
  20. Dimitri, C., A. Effland, and N. Conklin. 2005. The 20th century transformation of US agriculture and farm policy. Washington D.C., United States Department of Agriculture USDA: 17.Google Scholar
  21. Doncaster, C.P. 2001. Healthy wrinkles for population dynamics: unevenly spread resources can support more users. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:91-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ellis, J.E. and D.M. Swift. 1988. Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: alternate paradigms and implications for development. Journal of Range Management 41:450-459. EWG (Environmental Working Group) Farm Subsidy Database. 2006. USDA Subsidies for farms in US counties.
  23. Fabricius, C., A.R. Palmer, and M. Burger. 2002. Landscape diversity in a conservation area and commercial and communal rangeland in Xeric Succulent Thicket, South Africa. Landscape Ecology 17:531-537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fan, S. and X. Zhang 2004. Infrastructure and regional economic development in rural China. China Economic Review 15: 203-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2001. Pastoralism in the new millennium. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  26. Floater, G.J. 2001. Habitat complexity, spatial interference, and “minimum risk distribution”: A framework for population stability. Ecological Monographs 71:447-468.Google Scholar
  27. Frawley, P.T. 2002. Review of Australia’s rural veterinary services. Discussion Paper. Australian Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry: 168.Google Scholar
  28. GLCF (Global Land Cover Facility). 2005. Global Land Cover Facility home page. National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.; accessed May 23, 2005.
  29. Groombridge, B. 1992. Global diversity: status of the Earth’s living resources. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.Google Scholar
  30. Gustafson, E.J. and R.H. Gardner. 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77:94-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Humphrey, C. and D. Sneath. 1999. The end of nomadism? Society, state and the environment in Inner Asia. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  32. Illius, A.W. and T.G. O’Connor. 2000. Resource heterogeneity and ungulate population dynamics. Oikos 89:283-294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jennings, T. 2000. Living with uncertainty: Adaptive strategies for sustainable livelihoods in the northern Great Plains. MA Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  34. Kareiva, P.M. and M. Andersen. 1988. Spatial aspects of species interactions: the wedding of models and experiments. Pages 38-54. In: A. Hastings, editor. Community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  35. Kerven, C., I.I. Alimaev, R. Behnke, G. Davidson, L. Franchois, N. Malmakov, E. Mathijs, A. Smailov, S. Temirbekov, and I. Wright. 2003. Retraction and expansion of flock mobility in Central Asia: costs and consequences. In: N. Allsopp, A.R. Palmer, S.J. Milton, K.P. Kirkman, C.R. Hurt, and C.J. Brown, editors. Proceedings of the VIIth International Rangelands Congress. Durban, South Africa, August 26th-1st.Google Scholar
  36. Kerven, C., I. Alimaev, R. Behnke, R.G. Davidson, N. Malmakov, A. Smailov, and I. Wright. 2006. Fragmenting pastoral mobility: changing grazing pattern in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-39: 99-110.Google Scholar
  37. Kiguli, L.N., A.R. Palmer, and A.M. Avis. 1999. A description of rangeland on commercial and communal land, Peddie district, South Africa. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 16:89-95.Google Scholar
  38. Kolasa, J. and C.D. Rollo. 1991. Introduction: the heterogeneity of heterogeneity: a glossary. Pages 1-23. In: J. Kolassa and S.T.A. Pickett, editors. Ecological heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Laca, E. 1998. Livestock development and rangeland conservation tools for Central Asia. University of California - Davis, Davis, California.Google Scholar
  40. Lotsch, A., Y. Tian, M.A. Friedl, and R.B. Myneni. 2003. Land cover mapping in support of LAI/FPAR retrievals from EOS MODIS and MISR. Classification methods and sensitivities to errors. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24:1997-2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Loveland T.R., B.C. Reed, J.F. Brown, D.O. Ohlen, Z. Zhu, L. Yang, and J. Merchant. 2000. Development of global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21:1303-1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGarigal, K. and B.J. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-351.Google Scholar
  43. McGarigal, K., S.A. Cushman, M.C. Neel, and E. Ene. 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
  44. Merry, F., A.S. Pervaze, and D.G. McGrath. 2004. The role of informal contracts in the growth of small cattle herds on the floodplains of the Lower Amazon. Agriculture and Human Values 21:377-386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Munguneiri, L., J. Omiti, and P. Irungu. 2002. Animal health service delivery systems in Kenya's marginal areas under market liberalization: a case for community-based animal health workers. Nairobi, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) 2020 Vision Network for East Africa: 4.Google Scholar
  46. Musick, H.B. and H.D. Grover. 1991. Image textural measures as indices of landscape pattern. Pages 77-103. In: M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner, editors. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Nee, S. and N. Colegrave. 2006. Paradox of clumps. Nature 441:417-418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Nela, N. and D. Marshall. 1999. Credit management for rural development: Albania, a special case. Public Administration and Development 19:165-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. NIMA (National Imagery and Mapping Agency). 1997.
  50. Njenga, P. and A. Davis. 2003. Drawing the road map to rural poverty reduction. Transport Reviews 23: 217-241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. NOAA (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration). 1998. Stable lights and radiance calibrated lights of the world. CD-ROM. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration/National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, Colorado. http://www.julius.
  52. Oesterheld, M., C.M. DiBella, and H. Kerdiles. 1998. Relation between NOAA-AVHRR satellite data and stocking rate of rangelands. Ecological Applications 8:207-212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Neill, R.V., J.R. Krummel, R.H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, B. Jackson, D.L. DeAnglelis, B.T. Milne, M.G. Turner, B. Zygmunt, S.W. Christensen, V.H. Dale, and R.L. Graham. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1:153-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paruelo, J.M., H.E. Epstein, W.K. Lauenroth, and I.C. Burke. 1997. ANPP estimates from NDVI for the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 78:953-958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Prugh, T., R. Costanza, et al. 1999. Natural capital and human economic survival. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  56. Republic of Kazakhstan: Agency of Statistics. 2006. Dynamics rows for socio-economic development of the Republic of Kazakhstan include statistical data, Agency of Statistics.
  57. Rindfuss, R.R. and P.C. Stern. 1998. Linking remote sensing and social science: the need and the challenges. Pages 1-27. In: D. Liverman, E.F. Moran, R.R. Rindfuss, and P.C. Stern, editors. People and pixels: applications of remote sensing in the social sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  58. Ritchie, M. and H. Olff. 1999. Spatial scaling laws yield a synthetic theory of biodiversity. Nature 400:557-560.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Roff, D.A. 1974. Spatial heterogeneity and the persistence of populations. Oecologia 15: 245-258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Roughgarden, J.S., S.W. Running, and P.A. Matson. 1991. What does remote sensing do for ecology? Ecology 72:1918-1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rutten, M. 1992. Selling wealth to buy poverty. Verlag breitenbach Publishers, Saarbrucken. SA DOA (South Africa Department of Agriculture). 1998. Agricultural policy in South Africa. Pretoria, Ministry for Agriculture and Land Affairs.
  62. SRTM. 2002. Shuttle radar topography mission: mapping the world in 3 dimensions. US Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
  63. Swift, J., D. Barton, and J. Morton. 2002. Drought management for pastoral livelihoods -policy guidelines for Kenya. Natural Resources Institute, Kent, U.K.Google Scholar
  64. Tanser, F.C. and A.R. Palmer. 1999. The application of a remotely-sensed diversity index to monitor degradation patterns in a semi-arid heterogeneous, South African landscape. Journal of Arid Environments 43:477-484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thornton, P.K., S.B. BurnSilver, R.B. Boone, and K.A. Galvin. 2006. Modelling the impacts of group ranch subdivision on agro-pastoral households in Kajiado, Kenya. Agricultural Systems 87:331-356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tucker, C.J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of the Environment 8:127-150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Turner, M.G., R. Costanza, and F.H. Sklar. 1989. Methods to evaluate the performance of spatial simulation models. Ecological Modelling 48:1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Turner, M.G., R.H. Gardner, and R.V. O’Neill. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  69. UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 2001. Human development report. Addressing Social and Economic Disparities: Kenya: 134.Google Scholar
  70. UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 2003. Millennium development goals: a compact among nations to end human poverty. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UNDP: 16.Google Scholar
  71. U.S. Census Bureau. State and county quick facts, Perkins County SD and Adams County ND. 1999.
  72. U.S. Census Bureau, American Factfinder. 2000. DP-3 Profile of selected economic chara-cteristics. Census 2000 Summary File 3. South Dakota and North Dakota. http://factfinder. U_DP3&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U.
  73. Watkins, K., H. Fu, R. Fuentes, A. Ghosh, C. Giamberardini, et al. 2005. International cooperation at a crossroads: Aid, trade and security in an unequal world. Human Develop-ment Report. United Nations Development Program: 372.Google Scholar
  74. WB (The World Bank) Joint Economic Research Program. 2004. Kazakhstan’s livestock sector - supporting its revival. Almaty, Kazakhstan.Google Scholar
  75. White, D.H. and B. O’Meagher. 1995. Coping exceptional droughts in Australia. Drought Network News (June): 1-2.Google Scholar
  76. Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3:385-397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilson, T., K. Olson, J. Darlington, G. Whiting, and S. Mihovilovich. 2004. Managing the drought: Queensland primary producers’ strategies 2001-2004. Brisbane, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries: 52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randall B. Boone
    • 1
  • Shauna B. BurnSilver
    • 2
  • Russell S. Kruska
    • 3
  1. 1.Natural Resource Ecology LaboratoryColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory and Department of AnthropologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.International Livestock Research InstituteKenya

Personalised recommendations