LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OF PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIERS: LESSONS LEARNED ON DESIGN, CONTAMINANT TREATMENT, LONGEVITY, PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COST - AN OVERVIEW
An overview of permeable reactive barrier (PRB) performance for field sites in the U.S. was evaluated over the last 10 years by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Research and Development (EPA-ORD) in collaboration with other U.S. federal agencies, consulting companies and academic institutions under activities sponsored by the EPA’s Remedial Technology Development Forum (RTDF).
KeywordsBiomass Sugar Permeability Magnesium Chromate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blowes, D. W., Mayer, K. U., 1999, An In-Situ Permeable Reactive Barrier for the Treatment of Hexavalent Chromium and Trichloroethylene in Ground Water: Volume 3 Multicomponent Reactive Transport Modeling. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Report EPA/600/R-99/095c.Google Scholar
- Powell, R. M., Powell, P. D., Puls, R. W., 2002, Economic Analysis of the Implementation of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Remediation of Contaminated Ground Water. EPA/600/R-02/034.Google Scholar
- Wilkin, R. T., Puls, R. W., 2003, Capstone Report on the Application, Monitoring, and Performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Ground-Water Remediation. Volume 1: Performance Evaluations at Two Sites, EPA/600/R-03/045a.Google Scholar
- Wilkin, R. T., Puls, R. W., 2004, Evaluation of Permeable Reactive Barrier Performance, Prepared under the auspices of the Member Agencies of the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable, EPA/542/R-04/004.Google Scholar