Body Talk: Genetic Screening as a Device of Crime Regulation

  • Richard Hil
  • Richard Hindmarsh
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 30)

Considerable controversy has accompanied the emergence of human genetics and its offshoot, behaviour genetics, over recent decades. The tendency in some quarters to engage a form of genetic reductionism—i.e., attributing human behaviour mainly or entirely to genetic ‘‘make-up,’’ ‘‘markers,’’ ‘‘triggers,’’ or ‘‘traits’’—has raised concerns over the possible implications of this way of thinking about human affairs. Violence, aggression, impulsivity, and hyperactivity have been linked variously to genetic factors. While few if any geneticists would be brazen or foolhardy enough to talk about a ‘‘crime gene,’’ it has nonetheless become clear that certain genetic markers have been linked with certain problematic and aberrant conduct—markers that may be screened for in a future, arguably dystopian society.


Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Antisocial Behaviour Criminal Behaviour Genetic Screen Behaviour Genetic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Worster, D. 1994. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 406. Also Hindmarsh, R. and Lawrence, G. 2004. Recoding nature: deciphering the script. In: Hindmarsh, R. and Lawrence, G. (eds.), Recoding Nature: Critical Perspectives on Genetic Engineering. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lombroso, C. 1913. Crime: Its Causes and Remedies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cited in Roach Anlue, S. 1996. Deviance, Conformity and Control. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 11.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., 14–15.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibid., 17–18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taylor, I., Walton, P., and Young, J. 1973. The New Criminology: For a Social Theory of Deviance. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 39Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garland, D. 1997. Of crime and criminals: the development of criminology in Britain. In: Maguire, M., Morgan, R., and Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rafter, N. 1992. Criminal anthropology in the United States. Criminology 30 (4): 525–545, 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kevles, D. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor et al. ibid., 37.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kevles, ibid., 5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ellis, H. 1901. Cited in Kevles, ibid., 56.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cited in Kevles, ibid., 112.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheldon, W. 1949. Varieties of Delinquent Youth. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glueck, S. and Glueck, E. 1950. Unravelling Juvenile Delinquency. New York: Harper & Row; Eysenck, H. 1989. Crime and Personality. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eysenck, ibid., 41.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Fischer, E. 1997. The archetypal gene: the open history of a successful concept. In: Wirz, J. and Lammerts van Bueren, E. (eds.), The future of DNA. Proceedings of an International Conference about Presuppositions in Science and Expectations in Society, 2–5 October 1996, Goetheanum, Dornach, Switzerland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 35.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacobs, P., Brunton, M., Melville, M., Brittain, R., and McClermont, W. 1965. Aggressive behaviour, mental subnormality and the XYY male. Nature 208: 1351–1352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Price, W. 1966. Criminal patients with XYY sex chromosome complement. The Lancet 1: 35.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morgan, P. 1978. Delinquent Fantasies. London: Temple Smith, 343.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    See Taylor et al., ibid.,, 45–56; Roach, ibid., 14.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    See Higgins, E. 1997. Study links men’s bad behaviour to what’s in their genes. The Weekend Australian, 14 June.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mechnick, S. 1977. A bio-social theory of the learning of law abiding behaviour. In: Samoff, A., Mechnik, S., and Christensen, O. (eds.), Biosocial Bases of Criminal Behaviour. New York: Gaizner; see also Mechnick, S., Muffit, T., and Stack, S. (eds.). 1987. The Causes of Crime: New Biological Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ackers, R. 1994. Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evolution. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury, 80–81.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ibid., 81.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    For a general review, see Ellis, L. 1985. Genetics and criminal behaviour: evidence through the end of the 1970s. In: Marsh, F. and Katz, J. (eds.), Biology, Crime and Ethics: A Study of Biological Explanations for Criminal Behaviour. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing, 69–81.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibid., 81.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ibid., 82–83.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    See Breuer, G. 1982. Sociobiology and the Human Dimension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Hinde, R. 1987. Individuals, Relationships and Culture: Links Between Ethnology and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Alcock, J. 2001. The Triumph of Socio-Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    See Midgley, M. 2003. The Myths We Live By. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fishbein, D. 1990. Biological perspectives in criminology. Criminology 28: 27–72, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brunner, H. 1993. Abnormal behaviour associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science 262: 578–580; Booth, A. and Osgood, W. 1993. The influence of testosterone on deviance in adulthood. Criminology 31 (1): 93–117;.Van den Oord, E. 1994. A study of problem behaviourism 10- to 15-year-old biologically related and unrelated international adoptees. Behaviour Genetics 24 (3); Cook, E. 1995. Association with attention deficit disorder and the dopamine gene. American Journal of Human Genetics 56: 993–998; Cloninger, C., Adolfsson, R., and Svrakic, N. 1996. Mapping genes for human personality. Nature Genetics 12 (1): 3–4; McGuffin, P. and Thapar, A. 1997. Genetic basis of bad behaviour in adolescents. The Lancet 350 (9081): 885; Demott, K. 1995. Personality disorders may be genetic. Clinical Psychiatry News 27 (12): 27; Hudziak, J., Rudiger, L., Neale, M., Heath, A., and Todd, R. 2000. A twin study of inattentive, aggressive, and anxious/depressed behaviors. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39: 469–476. See also Taylor, L. 1984. Born to Crime: The Genetic Causes of Criminal Behaviour. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; Gunn, J. and Farrington, D. (eds.). 1985. Aggression and Dangerousness. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Atkinson, I., Robinson, J., and Shute, R. 1997. Between a rock and a hard place: an Australian perspective on education of children with ADHD. Education and Clinical Psychology 14 (1): 21–30, 21.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jacobs, B. 2002. Queensland Children at Risk: The Over Diagnosis of ‘‘ADHD’’ and the Overuse of Stimulant Medication. Brisbane: Youth Affairs Network Queensland, 4.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sprich, S., Biedenman, M., Crawford, H., Mundy, E., and Faraone, S. 2000. Adoptive and biological families of children and adolescents with ADHD. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39 (11): 1432–1437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ibid., 1435.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Galton, D. 2002. Eugenics: The Future of Human Life in the 21st Century. London: Abacus, 155.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
    Midgley, ibid.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    See Love, R. 2004. Deleting sadness? clones and designer babies. In: Hindmarsh, R. and Lawrence, G. (eds.), Recoding Nature: Critical Perspectives on Genetic Engineering. Sydney: UNSW Press; see also Rowland, R. 2001. The quality-control of human life: masculine science & genetic engineering. In: Hindmarsh, R. and Lawrence, G. (eds.), Altered Genes II: The Future? Melbourne: Scribe.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    See Pigem, J. 2002. Barcoding life. New Internationalist 349 (September); Gray, C. 2002. Cyborg Citizen. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Suzuki, D. and Levine, D. 1994. Cracking the Code: Redesigning the Living World. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 222.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    See Gene Watch UK. 2001. Human bio-collections: who benefits from gen-banking. Gene Watch UK Briefing, 14(April):4.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
    For the coinage of the term ‘‘bio-utopia’’ and discussion, see Hindmarsh, R. 2007. Genetic Manoeuvres, Bio-utopian Visions: A New Politics of Life. Perth: UWA Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Hil
  • Richard Hindmarsh
    • 1
  1. 1.Biopolitics and Environmental Policy in the Australian School of EnvironmentGriffith UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations