“Fundamentally, all philosophers agree” (Durant 1938: 185). Perhaps all controversy, all attempts by new generations of philosophers to assert oppositions to the old, is merely a gigantic example of pseudo-disagreement. In other words, perhaps the appearance of opposition lies in the fact that systematicians have not been able to “translate” among different styles of expression or different languages and that this has led to polemicized characterizations of each other’s work. Another possibility is that they have understood each other’s work but simply (1) assert that only one style of expression is correct and (2) believe that argumentation must be formulated as if disagreement concerns fact and not expression.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2005). Can There Be, Ultimately, Only One Valid Total System?. In: Drengson, A. (eds) The Selected Works of Arne Naess. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3727-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4519-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)