Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identifying and Quantifying Landscape Patterns in Space and Time

  • Chapter
A Changing World

Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 8))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acevedo M.F., Urban D.L. and Ablan M. 1995. Transition and gap models of forest dynamics. Ecological Applications 5: 1040-1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addicott J.F., Aho J.M., Antolin M.F., Padilla D.K., Richardson J.S. and Soluk D.A. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340-346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aks D.J. and Sprott J.C. 1996. Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns. Empirical Studies of the Arts 14: 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allain C. and Cloitre M. 1991. Characterising the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal sets. Physical Review A 44: 3552-3558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bak P. 1996. How nature works. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak P., Tang C. and Wiesenfeld K. 1987. Self-organised criticality: an explanation of 1/f noise. Physical Review Letters 59: 381-384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balzter H., Braun P.W. and Kohler W. 1998. Cellular automata models for vegetation dynamics. Ecological Modelling 107: 113-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbato W.L., Carneiro K., Cuppini D., Garnaes J., Gori G., Hughes G., Jensen C.P., Jorgensen J.F., Jusko O., Livi S., McQuoid H., Nielsen L., Picotto G.B. and Wilening G. 1995. Scanning tunnel-ling microscopy methods for the characterisation for roughness and micro hardness measure-ments. Synthesis report for research contract with the European Union under its programme for applied metrology. In: European Commission Catalogue number, Brussels, Luxemburg. Bascompte J. and Solé R.V. 1995. Rethinking complexity - modelling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 361-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J.C. 1981. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger J. 2002. Schweizer Wälder und Klimaveränderungen: Vergleich von Simulationen quanti-tativer Vegetationsmodelle. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 153: 167-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger J. 2005. Simulating complex landscapes with a generic model: sensitivity to qualitative and quantitative classifications. Ecological Complexity 2: 131-149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger J., Kienast F. and Zimmermann N.E. 2000. Risks of global warming on montane and subalpine forests in Switzerland. Regional Environmental Change 1: 99-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger J. and Mladenoff D.J. 2005. Quantifying spatial classification uncertainties of the historical Wisconsin landscape (U.S.A). Ecography 28: 141-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger J., Sprott J.C. and Mladenoff D.J. 2003. Self-organisation and complexity in historical landscape patterns. Oikos 100: 541-553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boots B. 2002. Local measures of spatial association. Ecoscience 9: 168-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw G.A. and Spies T.A. 1992. Characterising canopy gap structure in forests using wavelet analysis. Journal of Ecology 80: 205-215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D.G. 1998. Classification and boundary vagueness in mapping presettlement forest types. International Journal of Information Science 12: 105-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgi M., Hersperger A., Hall M., (Russell) Southgate E.W.B. and Schneeberger N. 2007. Using the past to understand the present land use and land cover. In: Kienast F., Wildi O. and Ghosh S. (eds.). A Changing World. Challenges for Landscape Research, Vol. 8: 133-144. Springer Landscape Series, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P.A. 1995. Spatial aspects of ecological data. In: van Tongeren O.F.R. (ed.), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, pp. 213-251. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cardille J.A. and Turner M.G. 2002. Understanding landscape metrics I. In: Gergel S.E. and Turner M.G. (eds.). Learning landscape ecology, pp. 85-100. Springer, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ceva H. 1998. On the asymptotic behvaieur for an earthquake model. Physics Letters A 245: 413-418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark J.S. 1998. Why trees migrate so fast: Confronting theory with dispersal biology and the paleorecord. American Naturalist 152: 204-224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark J.S., Kern R., Macklin E. and HilleRisLambers J. 1999. Seed dispersal near and far: Patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology 80: 1475-1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff A.D. and Ord J.K. 1981. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. Pion, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins S.A.O. and Lindborg R. 2002. Assessing changes in plant distribution patterns - indicator species versus plant functionl types. Ecological Indicators 1: 17-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csillag F. and Kabos S. 2002. Wavelets, boundaries, and the spatial analysis of landscape pattern. Ecoscience 9: 177-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale M.R.T. 2000. Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale V.A. 2001. Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecological Indicators 1: 3-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale V.A., Beyeler S.C. and Jackson B. 2002a. Understory vegetation indicators of anthropogenic disturbance in longleaf pine forests at Fort Benning, Georgia, U.S.A. Ecological Indicators 1: 155-170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale V.H., Fortes D.T. and Ashwood T.L. 2002b. A landscape transition matrix approach for land management. In: Liu J. and Taylor W. (eds.). Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management, pp. 265-293. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P., Baur P., Buchecker M., Gugerli F., Holderegger R. and Wohlgemuth T. 2007. The role of value systems in biodiversity research. In: Kienast F.,Wildi O. and Ghosh S. (eds.). A Changing World. Challenges for Landscape Research, Vol. 8: 27-34. Springer Landscape Series, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P. and Obrist M.K. 2003. Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 98: 87-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P. and Obrist M.K. 1998. In search of the best correlates for local organismal biodiversity in cultivated areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 297-309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckmann J.-P. and Ruelle D. 1985. Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev. Mod. Phys 57: 617-656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H. 1988. Vegetation ecology of Central Europe, 4th ed. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas I., Derenyi I., Jeong H., Neda Z., Oltvai Z.N., Ravasz E., Schubert A., Barabasi A.-L. and Vicsek T. 2002. Networks in life: scaling properties and eigenvalue spectra. Physica A 314: 25-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman R.T.T. 1995. Land mosaic: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman R.T.T. and Alexander I.F. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 207-231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman R.T.T. and Godron M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M.J., Boots B., Csillag F. and Remmel T.K. 2003. On the role of spatial stochastic models in understanding landscape indices in ecology. Oikos 102: 203-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M.-J., Dale M.R.T. and ver Hoef J. 2001. Spatial analysis in ecology. In: Piegorsch W.W. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, pp. 2051-2058. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J.F. and Forman R.T.T. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: Ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1: 5-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R.H., Milne B.T., Turner M.G. and O’Neil R.V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 19-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergel S.E., Turner M.G., Miller J.R., Melack J.M. and Stanley H.E. 2002. Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquatic Science 64: 118-128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosz J.R. 1993. Ecotonoe hierarchies. Ecological Applications 3: 369-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green D.G. and Sadedin S. 2005. Interactions matter - complexity in landscapes and ecosystems. Ecological Complexity 2: 117-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J.D., Gergel S.E. and Turner M.G. 2002. Understanding landscape metrics II. In: Gergel S.E. and Turner M.G. (eds.). Learning landscape ecology, pp. 101-111. Springer, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grove S.J. 2002. Tree basal area and dead wood as surrogate indicators of saproxylic insect faunal integrity: a case study from the Australian lowland tropics. Ecological Indicators 1: 171-188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson E.J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1: 143-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson E.J. and Parker G.R. 1992. Relationship between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecology 7: 101-110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R. and Chopping M. 1996. Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography 20: 418-445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haining R. 1997. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall H.M. and Grinnell J. 1919. Life-zone indicators in California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci 37-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargis C.D., Bissonnette J.A. and David J.L. 1998. The behaviour of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 13: 167-186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings H.M. and Sugihara G. 1993. Fractals: a User’s Guide for the Natural Sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunziker M., Buchecker M. and Hartig T. 2007. Space and place - two aspects of the human-land-scape relationship. In: Kienast F., Wildi O. and Ghosh S. (eds.). A Changing World. Challenges for Landscape Research, Vol. 8: 47-62. Springer Landscape Series, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks E.H. and Srivastava R.M. 1989. Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin H., Butaye J. and Hermy M. 2001. Forest plant species richness in small, fragmented mixed deciduous forest patches: The role of area, time and dispersal limitations. Journal of Biogeography 28: 801-812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenerette G.D. and Wu J.G. 2001. Analysis and simulation of land-use change in the central Arizona-Phoenix region, U.S.A. Landscape Ecology 16: 611-626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A.R. and Milne B.T. 1992. Diffusion in fractal landscapes: simulations and experimental studies of tenebrionid beetle movement. Ecology 73: 1968-1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones K.B., Neale A.C., Nash M.S., Riitters K.H., Wickham J.D., O’Neill R.V. and Van Remortel R.D. 2000. Landscape correlates of breeding bird richness across the United States midatlantic region. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 63: 159-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar F. and Schuster H.G. 1987. An easily calculable measure for the complexity of spatio-tem-poral patterns. Phys. Rev. A 36: 842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keitt T.H. and Urban D. 2005. Scale-specific inference using wavelets. Ecology 86: 2497-2504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller D.R. and Golley F.B. 2000. The philosophy of ecology. The University of Georgia Press, Athens GA, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienast F., Wildi O. and Brzeziecki B. 1998. Potential impacts of climate change on species rich-ness in mountain forests - an ecological risk assessment. Biological Conservation 83: 291-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lausch A. and Herzog F. 2002. Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: Issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecological Indicators 2: 3-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A. 1998. Ecosystems and the bioshpere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1: 431-436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A. 1978. Pattern formation in ecological communities. In: Steele J.H. (ed.), Spatial pattern in plankton communities, pp. 433-465. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A. 1979. Non-uniform stable solutions to reaction-diffusion equations: applications to ecological pattern formation. In: Haken H. (ed.). Pattern formation by dynamic systems and pattern recognition, pp. 210-222. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943-1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H. and Wu J. 2004. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecology 19: 389-399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold A.M. and Gurevitch J. 2002. Integrating the statistical analysis of spatial data in ecology. Ecography 25: 553-557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lischke H., Bolliger J. and Seppelt R. 2007. Dynamic spatio-temporal landscape models. In: Kienast F., Wildi O. and Ghosh S. (eds.). A Changing World. Challenges for Landscape Research, Vol. 8: 273-296. Springer Landscape Series, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mal T.K., Uveges J.L. and Turk K.W. 2002. Fluctuating asymmetry as an ecological indicator of heavy metal stress in Lythrum salicaria. Ecological Indicators 1: 189-195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot B. 1982. The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson S.M. 2001. Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32: 405-414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney A.B. and Odeh I.O.A. 1997. Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements, and fuzzy decisions. Geoderma 77: 85-113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K. and Cushman S.A. 2005. The gradient concept of landscape structure. In: J. Wiens and Moss M. (eds.). Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology, pp. 112-119. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C. and Ene E. 2002. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorial maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, U.S.A. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/ fragstats/fragstats.html.

  • Milne B.T. 1991. Lessons from applying fractal models to landscape patterns. In: Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. (eds.). Quantiative methods in landscape ecology, pp. 199-235. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne B.T. 1988. Measung the fractal geometry of landscapes.Appl. Math. Computation 27: 67-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne B.T. 1998. Motivation and benefits of complex systems approaches in ecology. Ecosystems 1: 449-456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne B.T., Turner M.G., Wiens J.A. and Johnson A.R. 1992. Interactions between the fractal geometry of landscapes and allometric herbivory. Theoretical Population Biology 41: 337-353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny B. and McBratney A.B. 2002. FuzME Version 3.0 http://www.usyd.edu.au/su/agric/acpa/fkme/program.html. The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, http://www.usyd.edu.au/ su/agric/acpa.

  • Neel M.C., McGarigal K. and Cushman S.A. 2004. Behaviour of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Landscape Ecology 19: 435-455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicheva D. 2001. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. In: El-Shaarawi A.H. and Piegorsch W.W. (eds.). Markov chains, pp. 1207-1208. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R.V., Milne B.T., Turner M.G. and Gardner R.H. 1988. Resource utilisation scales and landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 2: 63-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott L. 2005. Quantifying the complexity of simulated spatiotemporal population dynamics. Ecological Complexity 2: 175-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson D.M. 2002. The application of local measures of spatial autocorrelation for describing pattern in north Australian landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 64: 85-95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Percival D.B. 2001. Wavelets. In: Piegorsch W.W. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, pp. 2338-2351. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry D.A. 1995. Self-organising systems across scales. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 241-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plotnick R.E., Gardner R.H. and O’Neill R.V. 1993. Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landscape Ecology 8: 201-211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pykh Y.A. 2002. Lyapunov functions as a measure of biodiversity: Theoretical background. Ecological Indicators 2: 123-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan H.M., Colyvan M. and Burgman M.A. 2000.A proposal for fuzzy International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) categories and criteria. Biological Conservation 92: 101-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters K.H., O’Neill R.V., Hunsaker C.T., Wickham J.D., Yankee D.H., Timmins S.P., Jones K.B. and Jackson B.L. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and strucutre metrics. Landscape Ecology 10: 23-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoyi R.H., Wolf A. and Swinney H.L. 1982. One-dimensional dynamics in a multicomponent chemical reaction. Physical Review Letters 49: 245-248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snacken F. and Antrop M. 1983. Structure and dynamics of landscape systems. In: Drdos J. (ed.). Landscape synthesis: geoecological foundations of the complex landscape management, pp. 10-30. Veda Publishing House of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solé R.V., Alonso D. and McKane A. 2002. Self-organised instability in complex ecosystems. Philo-sophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 357: 667-681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé R.V. and Manrubia S.C. 1995. Are rainforests self-organised critical? Journal of Theoretical Biology 173: 31-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé R.V., Manrubia S.C. and Benton M. 1999. Criticality and scaling in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 156-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solé R.V., Miramontes O. and Goodwin B.C. 1993. Oscillations and chaos in ant societies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 161: 343-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPIP 2001. The scanning probe image processor. Image metrology APS. Lyngby, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprott J.C. 2003. Chaos and time-series analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprott J.C., Bolliger J. and Mladenoff D.J. 2002. Self-organised criticality in forest-landscape evolution. Physics Letters A 297: 267-271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P.D., Fahrig L., Henein K. and Merriam G. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of land-scape structure. Oikos 68: 571-573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson C.M. and McGarigal K. 2002. The influence of research scale on bald eagle habitat selection along the lower Hudson River, New York (U.S.A). Landscape Ecology 17: 569-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G. 2005. Landscape ecology in North America: past, present, and future. Ecology 86: 1967-1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G., Gardner R.H. and O’Neill R.V. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer Verlag, New York, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher M.B. 1992. Statistical models of succession. In: Glenn-Lewin D.C., Peet R.K. and Veblen T.T. (eds.), Plant succession: theory and prediction, pp. 215-248. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel H. 1998. Multivariate Geostatistics. 2nd, completely revised. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade T.G., Wickham J.D., Nash M.S., Neale A.C., Riitters K.H. and Jones K.B. 2003. A comparison of vector and raster GIS methods for calculating landscape metrics used in environmental assessments. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69: 1399-1405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H.H. 2003. Spatial covariance in plant communities: an integration of ordination, variogram modelling and the variance test of species richness. Ecology 84: 1045-1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H.H. 2004. Direct multiscale ordination with canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 85: 342-351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H.H. and Fortin M.J. 2005. Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology 86: 1975-1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb S.L. 1987. Beech range extension and vegetation history: pollen stratigraphy of two Wisconsin, U.S.A lakes. Ecology 68: 1993-2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham J.D., Jones K.B., Riitters K.H., Wade T.G. and O’Neill R.V. 1999. Transitions in forest fragmentation: implications for restoration opportunities at regional scales. Landscape Ecology 14: 137-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385-397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A. 2000. Ecological heterogeneity: an ontogeny of concepts and approaches. In: Hutchings M.J., John E.A. and Stewart A.J.A. (eds.). The ecological consequences of hetero-geneity, pp. 9-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • With K.A. 1994. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. Landscape Ecology 9: 25-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With K.A. 1997. The application of neutral landscape models in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 11: 1069-1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With K.A. 1997. The theory of conservation biology. Conserv Biol 11: 1436-1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With K.A. 2002. Landscape connectivity and metapopulation dynamics. In: Gergel S.E. and Turner M.G. (eds.), Learning landscape ecology, pp. 208-227. Springer, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and Hobbs R. 2002. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology 17: 355-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and Loucks O.L. 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology 70: 439-466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J., Shen W., Sun W. and Tueller P.T. 2002. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology 17: 761-782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X.B. and Sui D.Z. 2001. An initial exploration of a lacunarity-based segregation measure. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 433-446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yemshanov D. and Perera A.H. 2002. A spatially explicit stochastic model to simulate boreal forest cover transitions: general structure and properties. Ecological Modelling 150: 189-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information Control 8: 338-353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann N.E., Washington-Allen R.A., Ramsey R.D., Schaepman M.E., Mathys L., Kötz B., Kneubühler M., and Edwards T.C. 2007. Modern remote sensing for environmental monitoring landscape states and trajectories. In: Kienast F., Wildi O. and Ghosh S. (eds.). A Changing World. Challenges for Landscape Research, Vol. 8: 65-91. Springer Landscape Series, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollner P.A. and Lima S.L. 1997. Landscape-level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice: perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat. Oikos 80: 51-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Janine Bolliger

  2. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Helene H. Wagner

  3. Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Monica G. Turner

Authors
  1. Janine Bolliger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helene H. Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Monica G. Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Felix Kienast

  2. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Otto Wildi

  3. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Sucharita Ghosh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bolliger, J., Wagner, H.H., Turner, M.G. (2007). Identifying and Quantifying Landscape Patterns in Space and Time. In: Kienast, F., Wildi, O., Ghosh, S. (eds) A Changing World. Landscape Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4436-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation