Advertisement

Natural Disturbance Production Functions

  • Jeffrey P. Prestemon
  • D. Evan Mercer
  • John M. Pye
Part of the Forestry Sciences book series (FOSC, volume 79)

Natural disturbances in forests are driven by physical and biological processes. Large, landscape scale disturbances derive primarily from weather (droughts, winds, ice storms, and floods), geophysical activities (earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, even asteroid strikes), fires, insects, and diseases. Humans have always been affected by these processes and have invented ways to harness such processes or manipulate vegetation to enhance the values obtained from nature or reduce their negative impacts on human societies. For example, humans have cleared brush using fire to reduce pest populations and encourage forage for animals (Pyne 1995). Historically, humans have relied on traditions, rules of thumb, and trial and error to predict how their actions may affect disturbance probabilities and characteristics. More recently, economic assessment tools have helped gauge the consequences of natural disturbances on forests.

As the availability of science, technology, and environmental data have improved, scientists and economists have been able to quantify disturbances as production processes that emanate from a combination of biological, physical, and (or) human-initiated inputs. Ecologists have long recognized that disturbances lead to changes in ecological communities, which subsequently affect human societies. Economists, on the other hand, have been focused on understanding how humans can intervene to alter both the frequency and severity of natural disturbances. Improving scientific and economic assessment tools, and experience using them, have in turn helped us to appreciate the many consequences of natural disturbances. The objectives of this chapter are to (1) define disturbances and their stages, (2) discuss how mathematical expressions of disturbance processes, disturbance production functions, may differ from the production functions defined in neoclassical economics, (3) identify the stages of disturbances, (4) provide a typology of production functions relevant to forest disturbances, and (5) conclude with a discussion of management and science implications of recent research. Our focus is to understand how disturbances are produced and how they may be affected by intentional managerial actions. We show that quantitative characterization of disturbance processes is required to understand how management interventions into disturbances can lead to net societal gains. Throughout the chapter, we provide examples of how information about disturbances can be used to better achieve management and policy goals.

Keywords

Gypsy Moth Natural Disturbance Wildland Fire Fuel Treatment Disturbance Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, P. L., and C. D. Bevins. 1999. BEHAVE fire modeling system: Redesign and expansion. Fire Management Notes 59(2):16-19.Google Scholar
  2. Babcock, B. A., and J. F. Shogren. 1995. The cost of agricultural production risk. Agricultural Economics 12(2):141-150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, T. P., and J. Brenner. 1992. Prediction of wildfire activity in the southeastern United States. Southeast Regional Climate Center Research Paper Number 011592. Columbia SC: South Carolina Water Resources Commission.Google Scholar
  4. Butry, D. T. 2006. Estimating the efficacy of wildfire management using propensity scores. Ph. D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  5. Butry, D. T., D. E. Mercer, J. P. Prestemon, J. M. Pye, and T. P. Holmes. 2001. What is the price of catastrophic wildfire? Journal of Forestry 99(11):9-17.Google Scholar
  6. Butry, D. T., and J. P. Prestemon. 2005. Spatio-temporal wildland arson crime functions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, July 26-29, 2005, Providence, Rhode Island. 18 p.Google Scholar
  7. Carpentier, A., and R. D. Weaver. 1997. Damage control: Why econometrics matters. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(1):47-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers, R. G. 1991. Applied production analysis: A dual approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. 331 p.Google Scholar
  9. Collett, D. 1994. Modelling survival data in medical research. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC. 347 p.Google Scholar
  10. Cox, D. R., and D. Oakes. 1984. Analysis of survival data. London: Chapman and Hall. Davis, L. S. 1965. The economics of wildfire protection with emphasis on fuel break systems. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Forestry. 166 p.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, L. S., and R. W. Cooper. 1963. How prescribed burning affects wildfire occurrence. Journal of Forestry 61(12):915-917.Google Scholar
  12. di Castri, F. 1989. History of biological invasions with emphasis on the Old World. In: Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, J. Drake, F. di Castri, R. Groves, F. Kruger, H. A. Mooney, M. Rejmanek, and M. Williamson (eds.). New York, NY: Wiley. 30 p. Google Scholar
  13. Donovan, G. H., and D. B. Rideout. 2003a. An integer programming model to optimize resource allocation for wildfire containment. Forest Science 49(2):331-335.Google Scholar
  14. Donovan, G. H., and D. B. Rideout. 2003b. A reformulation of the cost plus net value change (C+NVC) model of wildfire economics. Forest Science 49(2):318-323.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrlich, I., and G. Becker. 1972. Market insurance, self-insurance, and self-protection. Journal of Political Economy 80:623-648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finney, M. A. 1998. FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator: Model development and evaluation. Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-4. USDA Forest Service. 47 p.Google Scholar
  17. Finney, M. A., and P. L. Andrews. 1999. FARSITE- A program for fire growth simulation. Fire Management Notes 59(2):13-15.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, M., and L. J. Savage. 1948. The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy 56:279-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Genton, M. G., D. T. Butry, M. Gumpertz, and J. P. Prestemon. 2006. Spatio-temporal analysis of wildfire ignitions in the St. Johns River Water Management District. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15(1):87-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gill, A. M., K. R. Christian, P. H. R. Moore, and R. I. Forrester. 1987. Bush fire incidence, fire hazard and fuel reduction burning. Australian Journal of Ecology 12:299-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gorte, J. K., and R. W. Gorte. 1979. Application of economic techniques to fire manage-ment—A status review and evaluation. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-53. USDA Forest Service, Ogden UT.Google Scholar
  22. Gumpertz, M. L., C. -T. Wu, and J. M. Pye. 2000. Logistic regression for southern pine beetle outbreaks with spatial and temporal autocorrelation. Forest Science 46(1):95-107.Google Scholar
  23. Headly, R. 1916. Fire Suppression District 5. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  24. Holmes, T. P. 1991. Price and welfare effects of catastrophic forest damage from southern pine beetle epidemics. Forest Science 37(2):500-516.Google Scholar
  25. Holmes, T. P, J. P. Prestemon, J. M. Pye, D. T. Butry, D. E. Mercer, and K. Abt. 2004. Using size-frequency distributions to analyze fire regimes in Florida. In: Fire in Temperate, Boreal and Montane Ecosystems, Proceedings of the Tall Timbers 22nd Fire Ecology Conference, W. J. de Groot and R. T. Engstrom (eds.). Tall Timbers Research Station and the Canadian Forest Service, October 15-18, 2001, Kananaskis Village, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Hyde, K., G. Jones, R. Silverstein, K. Stockmann, and D. Loeffler. 2006. Integrating fuel treatments into comprehensive ecosystem management. P. 549-561 In: Fuels Management-How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings, P. L. Andrews and B. W. Butler (eds. ). USDA Forest Service RMRS. 41 p.Google Scholar
  27. Just, R. E. 1975. Risk aversion under profit maximization. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2):347-352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keeley, J. E., C. J. Fotheringham, and M. Morais. 1999. Reexamining fire suppression impacts on brushland fire regimes. Science 284:1829-1832.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kent, B., K. Gebert, S. McCaffrey, W. Martin, D. Calkin, I. Schuster, H. Martin, W. Bender, G. Alward, K. Yoshitaka, P. J. Cohn, M. Carroll, D. Williams, and C. Ekarius. 2003. In: Social and Economic Issues of the Hayman Fire, R. T. Graham (tech. ed. ). Hayman Fire Case Study. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-114 (Revision), Fort Collins, CO: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. p. 315-395.Google Scholar
  30. Kuosmanen, T., D. Pemsi, and J. Wesseler. 2006. Specification and estimation of production functions involving damage control inputs: A two-stage, semiparametric approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(2):499-511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, B., P. S. Park, and J. Chung. 2006. Temporal and spatial characteristics of forest fires in South Korea between 1970 and 2003. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15 (3):389-396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leung, B., J. M. Drake, and D. M. Lodgea. 2004. Predicting invasions: Propagule pressure and the gravity of Allee effects. Ecology 85(6):1651-1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li, C., I. G. W. Corns, and R. C. Yang. 1999. Fire frequency and size distribution under natural conditions: A new hypothesis. Landscape Ecology 14:533-542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lichtenberg, E., and D. Zilberman. 1986. The econometrics of damage control: Why specification matters. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(2):261-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10(3):689-710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martell, D. L. 1980. The optimal rotation of a flammable forest stand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 10(1):30-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martell, D. L., S. Otukol, and B. J. Stocks. 1987. A logistic model for predicting daily people-caused forest fire occurrence in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 17:394-401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McIver, J. D., and L. Starr. 2000. Environmental effects of postfire logging: Literature review and annotated bibliography. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-486. USDA Forest Service. 72 p.Google Scholar
  39. McIver, J. D., and L. Starr. 2001. A literature review on the environmental effects of postfire logging. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 16(4):159-168.Google Scholar
  40. Mercer, D. E., and J. P. Prestemon. 2005. Comparing production function models for wildfire risk analysis in the wildland-urban interface. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (5):782-795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mercer, D. E., J. P. Prestemon, D. T. Butry, and J. M. Pye. 2007. Evaluating alternative prescribed burning policies to reduce net economic damages from wildfire. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(1):63-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meyers, R. K., and D. H. van Lear. 1998. Hurricane-fire interactions in coastal forests of the south: A review and hypothesis. Forest Ecology and Management 103:265-276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moritz, M. A. 1997. Analyzing extreme disturbance events: Fire in Los Padres National Forest. Ecological Applications 7(4):1252-1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Norman, S. P., and A. H. Taylor. 2003. Tropical and north Pacific teleconnections influence forest fire regimes in pine-dominated forests of north-eastern California, USA. Journal of Biogeography 30:1081-1092.Google Scholar
  45. Podur, J., D. L. Martell, and F. Csillag. 2003. Spatial patterns of lightning-caused forest fires in Ontario, 1976-1998. Ecological Modelling 164:1-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pope, R. D., and R. A. Kramer. 1979. Production uncertainty and factor demands for the competition firm. Southern Economics Journal 46:489-501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prestemon, J. P., and T. P. Holmes. 2004. Market dynamics and optimal timber salvage after a natural catastrophe. Forest Science 50(4):495-511.Google Scholar
  48. Prestemon, J. P., and D. T. Butry. 2005. Time to burn: Modeling wildland arson as an autore- gressive crime function. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(3):756-770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prestemon, J. P., J. M. Pye, D. T. Butry, T. P. Holmes, and D. E. Mercer. 2002. Understanding broad scale wildfire risks in a human-dominated landscape. Forest Science 48 (4):685-693.Google Scholar
  50. Prestemon, J. P., D. N. Wear, T. P. Holmes, and F. Stewart. 2006. Wildfire, timber salvage, and the economics of expediency. Forest Policy and Economics 8(3):312-322.Google Scholar
  51. Pye, J. M., J. P. Prestemon, D. T. Butry, and K. L. Abt. 2003. Prescribed burning and wildfire risk in the 1998 fire season in Florida. In: Conference on Fire, Fuel Treatments and Ecological Restoration, April 16-18, 2002, Ft. Collins, CO, P. Omi (ed. ). Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-P-29. USDA Forest Service. p. 15-26.Google Scholar
  52. Pyne, S. J. 1995. The culture of fire on earth. New York: Henry Holt. 379 p.Google Scholar
  53. Ripley, B. D. 1976. The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. Journal of Applied Probability 13:255-266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Routledge, R. D. 1980. The effect of potential catastrophic mortality and other unpredictable events on optimal forest rotation policy. Forest Science 26(3):389-399.Google Scholar
  55. Sharov, A. A., and A. M. Liebhold. 1998a. Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecological Applications 8(3):833-845.Google Scholar
  56. Sharov, A. A., and A. M. Liebhold. 1998b. Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecological Applications 8:1170-1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sharov, A. A., and A. M. Liebhold. 1998c. Quantitative analysis of gypsy moth spread in the Central Appalachians. In: Population and Community Ecology for Insect Management and Conservation, J. Braumgartner, P. Brandmayer and B. F. J. Manly (eds. ). Balkema, Rotterdam. p. 99-110.Google Scholar
  58. Sharov, A. A., A. M. Liebhold, and E. A. Roberts. 1998. Optimizing the use of barrier zones to slow the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in North America. Journal of Economic Entomology 91:165-174.Google Scholar
  59. Shogren, J. 1991. Endogenous risk and protection premiums. Theory and Decision 31(2/3):241-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shogren, J., and T. Crocker. 1991. Risk, self-protection, and ex ante economic value. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20:1-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sparhawk, W. N. 1925. The use of liability ratings in planning forest fire protection. Journal of Agricultural Research 30:693-762.Google Scholar
  62. Strauss, D., L. Bednar, and R. Mees. 1989. Do one percent of forest fires cause ninety-nine percent of the damage? Forest Science 35(2):319-328.Google Scholar
  63. Vega Garcia, C., P. M. Woodard, S. J. Titus, W. L. Adamowicz, and B. S. Lee. 1995. A logit model for predicting the daily occurrence of human caused forest fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 5:101-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Westerling, A. J., A. Gershunov, D. R. Cayan, and T. P. Barnett. 2002. Long lead statistical forecasts of area burned in western U. S. wildfires by ecosystem province. International Journal of Wildland Fire 11:257-266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williamson, M. 1996. Biological Invasions. Chapman & Hall, London, UK. Woodall, C. W., P. L. Gramsch, and W. Thomas. 2005. Applying survival analysis to a large-scale forest inventory for assessment of tree mortality in Minnesota. Ecological Modelling 189:199-208.Google Scholar
  66. Yin, R., and D. H. Newman. 1996. The effect of catastrophic risk on forest investment decisions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31(3):186-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey P. Prestemon
    • 1
  • D. Evan Mercer
    • 1
  • John M. Pye
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Research StationUnited States Forest ServiceResearch Triangle Park

Personalised recommendations