Skip to main content

CENTRALIZED DECENTRALIZATION IN MALAYSIAN EDUCATION

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Decentralization

Abstract

One current global trend in educational reformis the decentralization of national education systems. Decentralization has been promoted by UNESCO, the World Bank, and other multilateral and bilateral assistance agencies for a number of years (McGinn, 1997). The growing interest in decentralization arises from the realization that many education systems, particularly those in the Third World, have expanded rapidly, making it increasingly difficult to plan and administer all education activities effectively and efficiently from the center. Support for decentralization has become so widespread that even highly centralized countries like Malaysia and Singapore have endorsed initiatives that aim to decentralize aspects of their education systems. This chapter analyzes the most prominent decentralization measures that have been undertaken in Malaysia over the past two decades. These initiatives include the establishment of District Education Offices, reforms calling for the decentralization of the national curriculum, and the privatization of higher education. Malaysia provides an interesting case because although the central government has publicly supported numerous decentralization programs, it has been reluctant to relinquish its authority over the schools. In short, the form is there but not the substance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Azizah A. R. (1987). Curriculum innovation in Malaysia: The case of the KBSR, PhD thesis, University of London Institute of Education, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1999). Control of education: Issues and tensions in centralization and decentralization. In R. F. Arnove and C. A. Torres (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 207–232). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (Eds.) (1983). Decentralization and development: Policy implementation in developing countries. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (1980). Laporan Jawatankuasa Kabinet Mengkaji Pelaksanaan Dasar Pelajaran, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauglo, J. (1995). Forms of decentralisation and their implications for education. Comparative Education, 31(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. N. N. (2001). Private higher education in Malaysia: Expansion, diversification and consolidation. Paper presented at the Second Regional Seminar on Private Higher Education: Its Role in Human Resource Development in a Globalised Knowledge Society, organized by UNESCO PROAP and SEAMEO RIHED on June 20–22, 2001, Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, N. F. (1997). The impact of globalization on national education systems. Prospects, XXVII(1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad Kombali, B. H. (2000). Peranan dan tanggungjawab pegawai pendidikan daerah: Satu kajian kes di pejabat pendidikan daerah Klang, Unpublished MEd thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalliah, M., & Thiyagarajah, R. (2000). Teacher education for TESOL in Malaysia: The pursuance of conformity in the context of cultural diversity. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 3(2), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor Azmi, I. (1988). In-service courses and teachers’ professionality: The implementation of KBSR in Malaysia, PhD thesis, University of Sussex, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. (1990). Decentralizing urban development programs: A framework for analyzing policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Agency for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siti Hawa, B. A. (1986). Implementing a new curriculum for primary schools: A case study from Malaysia, PhD thesis, University of London Institute of Education, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee, C. H. (1996). Fiscal federalism. In K. S. Jomo and S. K. Ng (Eds.), Malaysia’s economic development: Policy and reform (pp. 227–316). Kuala Lumpur: Pelanduk Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, M.N. (2006). CENTRALIZED DECENTRALIZATION IN MALAYSIAN EDUCATION. In: BJORK, C. (eds) Educational Decentralization. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4358-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics