Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Language Library ((SLAP,volume 6))

Abstract

These are some bits and pieces on the distinction between count nouns and mass nouns in an attempt to investigate the semantic and/or ontological significance of that distinction.1 Count nouns are nouns like ‘label’, ‘fable’ and ‘table’, and mass nouns are nouns like ‘milk’ and ‘honey’ and ‘silk’ and ‘money’. My question is whether count nouns correspond to counting things and mass nouns to amassing stuff and also whether there is a corresponding ontological difference in what we talk about.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. It would be too cumbersome to mention all of my sources at the appropriate point in the text, but I am happy to acknowledge here the very important help of Jude Carlson, Helen Cartwright, Henry Laycock, Brian Loar, Jeffry Pelletier, and Haj Ross. I have also had the benefit of comments on very different ancestors of this paper read at the University of Wisconsin, Brandeis University, and a meeting of the Western Canadian Philosophical Association in Edmonton. Some of my examples also come from the seminal work of Otto Jespersen in The Philosophy of Grammar (New York, Norton Library; 1965 (first published 1924)), pp. 198–201.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I am largely in agreement with the main points in Henry Laycock’s ‘Some Questions of Ontology’, Philosophical Review 81(1972), 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Henry Laycock’s ‘Some Questions of Ontology’, esp. pp. 30–34 and his ‘Chemistry and Individuation’, a paper read to the Canadian Philosophical Association, 6 June, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Helen Cartwright, ‘Quantities’, Philosophical Review 79 (1970), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. See Laycock, ‘Some Questions of Ontology’, p. 18 for another statement of this view. 15 Cf. Eddy Zemach, ‘Four Ontologies’, Journal of Philosophy 67 (1970), 231–247, for an interesting discussion of this kind of view.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ware, R.X. (1975). Some Bits and Pieces. In: Pelletier, F.J. (eds) Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems. Synthese Language Library, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4110-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4110-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3265-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4110-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics