Skip to main content

ONTOLOGY LEARNING USING WORDNET LEXICON

  • Conference paper
Computational Methods

Abstract

Current Semantic Web community has popularized ontology research. However, ontology building by hand has proven to be a very hard and error-prone task and become the bottleneck of ontology acquiring process. WordNet, an electronic lexical database, is considered to be the most important resource available to researchers in computational linguistics. The paper proposes an ontology learning approach, which uses WordNet lexicon resources to build a standard OWL ontology model. The approach will help the automation of ontology building and be very useful in ontology-based applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. T.B. Lee, J. Hendler and O. Lasilla (2001), The Semantic Web. The Scientific American, 284, 5, pp. 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T.R. Gruber (1995), Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing, International Journal of Human and Computer Studies, 43, 5/6, pp. 907–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. W3C (2003), “OWL Web Ontology Language Overview”, http://Web.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Miller (1990), WordNet: An on-line Lexical data-base. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 4, pp. 235–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Calzolari, A. Zampolli and A. Lenci (2002), Towards a Standard for a Multilingual Lexical Entry: The EAGLES/ISLE Initiative, LNCS 2276, Springer, pp. 264–279.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Horrocks and U. Sattler (2001), Ontology Reasoning in the SHOQ(D) Description Logic, Proceedings of the seventeenth International Joint Cenference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Martin (2003), Correction and extension of wordNet 1.7, 11th International Conference on Conceptual Structure (ICCS), LNAI 2746, pp. 160–173.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Aldo, N. Roberto and V. Paola (2003), The Onto WordNet project. Extension and axiomatization of conceptual relation in WordNet, LNCS 2888, pp. 820–838.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hu, H., Du, X., Liu, D., Ouyang, J. (2006). ONTOLOGY LEARNING USING WORDNET LEXICON. In: LIU, G., TAN, V., HAN, X. (eds) Computational Methods. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3953-9_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3953-9_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3952-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3953-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics