Advertisement

Riverbank Filtration in the Netherlands: Well Fields, Clogging and Geochemical Reactions

  • Pieter J. Stuyfzand
  • Maria H. A. Juhàsz-Holterman
  • Willem J. de Lange
Part of the Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (NAIV, volume 60)

Abstract

River Bank Filtration (RBF) contributes ca. 7% (80 Mm3/a) to the national drinking water supply in the Netherlands, through a total of 26 well fields. These RBF well fields are classified on the basis of (1) the main driving mechanism of flow (polder or pump driven); (2) RBF periodicity (flow direction temporarily reversing or not), (3) type of riverbed (sand or gravel), and (4) type of contact of river with aquifer (with or without intercalated aquitard(s)).

Three case studies are reviewed which demonstrate the water quality, geochemical reactions and clogging phenomena in differing systems. The mass balance approach, also called ‘reverse modeling’, is applied to identify and quantify the extent of the most important hydrogeochemical reactions at the three case study sites.

Clogging of the river bed seems to be a problem in the Netherlands only in RBF systems with a true gravel bed such as Roosteren along the Meuse River, and on sites where sludge is strongly accumulating due to structurally reduced river flows, as in the Hollandsch Diep estuary which was dammed in 1971 as part of the Delta Works.

Key words

river bank filtration geoclogging Netherlands water supply 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hiemstra, P. & too many others 2001. Natural recharge of groundwater: bank infiltration in the Netherlands. In: W. Jülich & J. Schubert [eds], Proc. International Riverbank Filtration Conference, Nov 2–4, 2000 Düsseldorf Germany, IAWR-Rhein Themen 4, 67–79.Google Scholar
  2. Juhàsz-Holterman, M.H.A. 2001. Reliable drinking water by bank filtration along the River Maas (Meuse), by knowledge of the system combined with simple resources. In: W. Jülich & J. Schubert [eds], Proc. International Riverbank Filtration Conference, Nov 2–4, 2000 Düsseldorf Germany, IAWR-Rhein Themen 4, 225–234.Google Scholar
  3. Jülich, W. & J. Schubert 2001. Proceedings of the international Riverbank Filtration Conference. Nov 2–4, 2000 Düsseldorf Germany, IAWR-Rhein Themen 4, 309p.Google Scholar
  4. Medema, G.J., M.H.A. Juhàsz-Holterman & J.A. Luijten 2001. Removal of micro-organisms by bank filtration in a gravel-sand soil. In: W. Jülich & J. Schubert [eds], Proc. International Riverbank Filtration Conference, Nov 2–4, 2000 Düsseldorf Germany, IAWR-Rhein Themen 4, 161–168.Google Scholar
  5. Ray, C. [ed] 2002. Riverbank filtration: Understanding contaminant biogeochemistry and pathogen removal. Proc. NATO Workshop Tihany, Hungary 5–8 Sept 2001, NATO Science Series IV Earth and Env Sciences 14, Kluwer Acad Publ.Google Scholar
  6. Schellekens, M. 2004. Measures against the deposition of struvite on water mains. H2O 2004-17 (in dutch), 36–37.Google Scholar
  7. Sontheimer, H. 1991. Trinkwasser aus dem Rhein? Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar
  8. Stuyfzand, P.J. 1985. Quality changes during artificial recharge in the coastal dunes of the Netherlands: Macroparameters. Kiwa Meded. 82 (in dutch), 336p.Google Scholar
  9. Stuyfzand, P.J. 1989a. A new hydrochemical classification of watertypes. IAHS Publ. 182, 89–98.Google Scholar
  10. Stuyfzand, P.J. 1989b. Hydrology and water quality aspects of Rhine bank ground water in The Netherlands. J. Hydrol. 106, 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stuyfzand, P.J. 1998. Fate of pollutants during artificial recharge and bank filtration in the Netherlands. In: Peters J.H. (ed), Artificial recharge of groundwater, Proc. 3rd Intern. Symp. on Artificial Recharge, Amsterdam the Netherlands, Balkema, 119–125.Google Scholar
  12. Stuyfzand, P.J., W.J. de Lange & A. Zindler 2004. Recognition, dating and genesis of fresh and brackish groundwaters in the Hollandsch Diep estuary in the compound Rhine-Meuse delta. Proc. SWIM-18 Cartagena, 31 May–3 June 2004, in press.Google Scholar
  13. Stuyfzand, P.J. & M.H.A. Juhàsz-Holterman 2000. Effects of aquifer passage on Meuse River water during river bank filtration near Roosteren: final report on the monitoring from January 1998 till November 1999. Kiwa-rapport KOA 00-049 (in dutch).Google Scholar
  14. Stuyfzand, P.J. & F. Lüers 1996. Behaviour of environmental pollutants during river bank filtration and artificial recharge; effects of aquifer passage as measured along flow lines. Kiwa-Meded. 125 (in dutch), 272p.Google Scholar
  15. Stuyfzand, P.J., F. Lüers & G.K. Reijnen 1994. Geohydrochemical aspects of methane in groundwater in the Netherlands. H2O 27 (in dutch), 500–510.Google Scholar
  16. Stuyfzand, P.J. & A. Zindler 1998. Origin, age and geochemical reactions of estuarine surface water infiltrated in the Hollandsch Diep. Kiwa-report KOA 98.161 (in dutch), 72p.Google Scholar
  17. Stuyfzand, P.J., A. Zindler & W.J. de Lange 1999. Age and flow of water infiltrated in the Hollandsch Diep, as determined by hydrochemical patterns. Kiwa-report KOA 99.206 (in dutch), 59p.Google Scholar
  18. Stuyfzand, P.J. & H. Timmer 1999. Deep well injection at the Langerak and Nieuwegein sites in the Netherlands: chemical reactions and their modeling. Kiwa-report SWE 99.006, 44p.Google Scholar
  19. Van der Kooij [ed] 1986. Drinking water from Rhine riverbank filtrate. Kiwa Meded. 89 in dutch.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter J. Stuyfzand
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maria H. A. Juhàsz-Holterman
    • 3
  • Willem J. de Lange
    • 4
  1. 1.Dept. Hydrology & Geo-Environmental Sciences, FALWFree UniversityAmsterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.Kiwa Water ResearchNieuwegeinNetherlands
  3. 3.Water Supply Limburg (WML)MaastrichtNetherlands
  4. 4.Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment (RIZA)LelystadNetherlands

Personalised recommendations