The issue over empiricism and realism, presently the focus of much discussion in the philosophy of science, is but the manifestation of an age-old perplexity. The perplexity is over the relation between one’s experiences, and the world, or between phenomena and reality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). Empiricism Vs. Realism – The Perennial Debate In The Philosophy Of Science. In: The Metaphysics of Science-1. Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science, vol 173. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3838-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3838-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3837-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3838-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)