Computer-based Technology and Music Teaching and Learning: 2000–2005

  • Peter R. Webster
Part of the Springer International Handbook of Research in Arts Education book series (SIHE, volume 16)


Music Therapy Dissertation Abstract Music Composition Music Education Music Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Addessi, A., & Pachet, F. (2005). Experiments with a musical machine: Musical style replication in 3 to 5 year old children. British Journal of Music Education, 22 (1), 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Airy, S., & Parr, J. (2001). MIDI, music and me: Students’ perspectives on composing with MIDI. Music Education Research, 3 (1), 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, N. (2003). Integrating web based learning and instruction into a graduate music education research course: An exploratory study. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 2 (1), 2–8.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, N. (2004). University music education student perceptions and attitudes about instructional technology. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 2 (2), 2–20.Google Scholar
  5. Bauer, W. (2001). Student attitudes toward web-enhanced learning in a music education methods class: A case study. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1 (1), 20–30.Google Scholar
  6. Bauer, W. (2003). Gender differences and the computer self-efficacy of preservice music teachers. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 2 (1), 9–15.Google Scholar
  7. Bauer, W., McAllister, P., & Reese, S. (2003). Transforming music teaching via technology: The role of professional development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51 (4), 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckstead, D. (2001). Will technology transform music education? Music Educators Journal, 87 (6), 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benson, C. (2002). The effects of instructional media on group piano student performance and attitude. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1 (2), 38–55.Google Scholar
  10. Bernard, R., Abrami, P., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., & Wozney, L. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74 (3), 379–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berz, W. L., & Bowman, J. (1994). Applications of research in music technology. Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.Google Scholar
  12. Berz, W. L., & Bowman, J. (1995). An historical perspective on research cycles in music computer-based technology. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 126, 15–28.Google Scholar
  13. Buehrer, T. (2000). An alternative pedagogical paradigm for aural skills: An examination of constructivist learning theory and its potential for implementation into aural skills curricula. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(04), 1210. (University Microfilms No. AAT 9966041).Google Scholar
  14. Bush, J. (2001). Introducing the practitioner’s voice through electronic mentoring. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1 (1), 4–9.Google Scholar
  15. Bush, J. (2003). The effects of gender and classification on university music education students’ attitudes toward electronic journal writing as a reflective practice. Contributions to Music Education, 30 (2), 59–74.Google Scholar
  16. Byrne, C., & MacDonald, R. (2002). The use of information & communication technology (I & CT) in the Scottish music curriculum: a focus group investigation of theses and issues. Music Education Research, 4 (2), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crowe, B., & Rio, R. (2004). Implications of technology in music therapy practice and research for music therapy education: A review of literature. Journal of Music Therapy, XLI (4), 282–320.Google Scholar
  18. Eberle, K. (2003). Video conferencing and web based instruction over the Internet. Journal of Singing, 59 (3), 241–245.Google Scholar
  19. Enders, B. (2000). Musical education and the new media: The current situation and perspectives for the future. In H. Braun (Ed.), Music and technology in the twentieth century (pp. 223–238). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fautley, J. (2002). Band online: The what, why, whether, when, where, who, how, what if and what else. Canadian Music Educator, 43 (3), 33–35.Google Scholar
  21. Field, C. (2001). Music at the speed of light: Sheet music on the Internet. Teaching Music, 9 (3), 32–35.Google Scholar
  22. Fung, V. (2003). Gender differences in preservice music educators’ familiarity with technology. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 2 (1), 31–40.Google Scholar
  23. Glenn, S. (2000). The effects of a situated approach to musical performance education on student achievement: Practicing with an artificially intelligent computer accompanist. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(08), 3098. (University Microfilms Order No. AAT 9984138).Google Scholar
  24. Glenn, S., & Fitzgerald, M. (2002). Technology and student attitudes, motivation, and self-efficacy: A qualitative study. NAXWPI Journal (Fall), 4–15.Google Scholar
  25. Green, B. (2003). The comparative effects of computer-mediated interactive instruction and traditional instruction on music achievement in guitar performance. Dissertations Abstracts International, 64 (12), 4337. (University Microfilms Order No. AAT NQ86051).Google Scholar
  26. Gregory, D. (2002). Assistive technology for computer-based music instruction. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1 (2), 15–23.Google Scholar
  27. Greher, G. (2004). Multimedia in the classroom: Tapping into an adolescent’s cultural literacy. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 2 (2), 21–43.Google Scholar
  28. Griscom, R. (2003). Distance music: Delivering audio over the Internet. Notes – Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association, 59 (3), 521–541.Google Scholar
  29. Hagen, S. (2001). A study of the self-assessment and preferences of college students in a beginning music technology class. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1 (1), 31–46.Google Scholar
  30. Healy, J. M. (1998). Failure to connect: How computers affect our children’s minds, for better or worse. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  31. Higgins, W. (1992). Technology. In R. Colwell (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 480–497). New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
  32. Ho, W. (2004). Attitudes towards information technology in music learning among Hong Kong Chinese boys and girls. British Journal of Music Education, 21 (2), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hopkins, M. (2002). The effects of computer-based expository and discovery methods of instruction on aural recognition of music concepts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50 (2), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jassmann, A. (2004). The status of music technology in the K-12 curriculum of South Dakota public schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65 (04), 1294. University Microfilms No. AAT 3127829).Google Scholar
  35. Keast, D. (2004). Implementation of constructivist techniques into an online activity for graduate music education students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65 (08), 2932. University Microfilms No. AAT 3144428).Google Scholar
  36. Kennedy, M. (2002). Listening to the music: compositional processes of high school composers Journal of Research in Music Education, 50 (2), 94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kraus, B., Gonzalez, G., Hill, G., & Hemphreys, G. (2004). Interactive computer feedback on the development of fundamental conducting skills. Journal of Band Research, 39, 35–44.Google Scholar
  38. Latonero, M. (2003). Music in the age of the Internet: Social and cultural implications of emerging communication technology. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64 (09), 3126. (University Microfilms No. AAT 3103928).Google Scholar
  39. Legette, R. (2002). The effect of technology = assisted music instruction on the self-concept and academic achievement of fourth grade public school students. Contributions to Music Education, 29 (1), 59–69.Google Scholar
  40. McCord, K. (2002). Children with special needs compose using music technology. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1 (2), 3–14.Google Scholar
  41. Meltzer, J. (2001). A survey to assess the technology literacy of undergraduate music majors at big-10 universities: Implications for undergraduate courses in music education technology. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62 (08), 2709. (University Microfilms No. AAT 3023143).Google Scholar
  42. Mills, J., & Murray, A. (2000). Music technology inspected: Good teaching in Key Stage 3. British Journal of Music Education, 17 (2), 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nilsson, B., & Folkestad, G. (2005). Children’s practice of computer-based composition. Music Education Research, 7 (1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Neill, S. A., & Seddon, F. A. (2001). An evaluation study of computer-based compositions by children with and without prior experience of formal instrumental music tuition. Psychology of Music, 29 (1), 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ohlenbusch, G. (2001). A study of the use of technology applications by Texas music educators and the relevance to undergraduate music education curriculum. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62 (03), 957. (University Microfilms No. AAT 3010524).Google Scholar
  46. Piccioni, R. (2003). Integrating technology into undergraduate music appreciation courses. Dissertation Abstracts Internation, 64 (09), 3230. (University Microfilms Order No. AAT 3106957).Google Scholar
  47. Pitts, A., & Kwami, R. (2002). Raising students’ performance in music composition through the use of information and communications technology (ICT): A survey of secondary schools in England. British Journal of Music Education, 19 (1), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Price, H., & Pan, K. (2002). A survey of music education technology at colleges in the southeastern USA. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1 (2), 56–66.Google Scholar
  49. Quesnel, R. (2002). A computer-assisted method for training and researching timbre memory and evaluation skills. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64 (04), 1128. (University Microfilms Order No. AAT NQ78756).Google Scholar
  50. Rees, F. (2002). Distance learning and collaboration in music education. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 257–273). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  51. Reese, S. (2001). Tools for thinking in sound. Music Educators Journal, 88 (1), 42–45, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reese, S., McCord, K., & Walls, K. (2001). Strategies for teaching: Technology. Reston, VA: MENC, the National Association for Music Education.Google Scholar
  53. Reese, S., Repp, R., Meltzer, J., & Burrack, F. (2002). The design and evaluation of use of a multimedia web site for online professional development. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1 (2), 24–37.Google Scholar
  54. Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2001). Developing multimedia materials for creating ensemble. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 1 (1), 47–55.Google Scholar
  55. Roberts, B. A. (2000). Editorial. In B. Hanley & B. Roberts (Eds.), Looking forward: Challenges to Canadian music education (pp. 5–10). Toronto: The Canadian Music Educations Association.Google Scholar
  56. Ryder, C. (2004). The use of Internet-based teaching strategies in teaching vocal anatomy, function, and health to high school choral music students, and its effect on student attitudes and achievement. Dissertations Abstracts International, 65 (06), 2130. (University Microfilms No. AAT3136262).Google Scholar
  57. Savage, J. (2005). Working towards a theory for music technologies in the classroom: How pupils engage with and organize sounds with new technologies. British Journal of Music Education, 22 (2), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Savage, J., & Challis, M. (2001). Dunwich revisited: Collaborative composition and performance with new technologies. British Journal of Music Education, 18 (2), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seddon, F. A., & O’Neill, S. (2003). Creative thinking processes in adolescent computer-based compositions: An analysis of strategies adopted and the influence of instrumental music training. Music Education Research, 5 (2), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Siegel, J. (2004). General music: How one class with one computer composed music. Teaching Music,11 (5), 44–48.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, K. (2002). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction on the development of rhythm reading skills among middle school instrumental students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63 (11), 3891. (University Microfilms Order No. AAT 3070051).Google Scholar
  62. Stauffer, S. L. (2001). Composing with computers: Meg makes music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 150 (Fall), 1–20.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, J., & Deal, J. (2000). Integrating Technology into the K-12 Music Curriculum: A National Survey of Music Teachers.Google Scholar
  64. Upitis, R. (2001). Spheres of influence: The interplay between music research, technology, heritage, and music education. International Journal of Music Education, 37, 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker, D. (2001). Computer-aided collaboration in a graduate-level music analysis course: An exploration of legitimate peripheral participation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62 (04), 1386. (University Microfilms Order No. AAT NQ58954).Google Scholar
  66. Walls, K. C. (1997). Music performance and learning: The impact of digital technology. Psychomusicology, 16 (1–2), 68–76.Google Scholar
  67. Walls, K. (2000). Technology for future music educators. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 9 (2), 14–21.Google Scholar
  68. Walls, K. (2002). School musicians’ attitudes toward hypermedia-enhanced rehearsals: A pilot study. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, Fall/Winter, 73–79.Google Scholar
  69. Webster, P. (2002). Computer-based technology and music teaching and learning. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 416–439). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Williams, D., & Webster, P. (2006). Experiencing music technology (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Schirmer.Google Scholar
  71. Winzenried, R. (2002). The next big step? Long-distance learning via Internet2 [Electronic Version]. Symphony,

Technology and Music Education in Sweden

  1. Comber, C., Hargreaves, D. J., & Colley, A. (1993). Girls, boys and music technology in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 10, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Folkestad, G. (1989). Elektrotekniska hjälpmedel i musikundervisningen [Electro-technical means of assistance in music teaching]. Göteborg: Göteborg University, Department of Musicology.Google Scholar
  3. Folkestad, G. (1996). Computer based creative music making: Young people’s music in the digital age. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  4. Folkestad, G. (2005). Professional composers’ assessment criteria of composition. Paper presented at the International Conference on Psychological. Philosophical and Educational Issues in Music Performance “Performance Matters!”, Porto, Portugal, Sept 14–17, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. Folkestad, G., Lindström, B., Hargreaves, D. J., Colley, A., & Comber, C. (1996). Gender, computers, music technology: Experience and attitudes (No. 1996:06): Göteborg: Göteborg university, Department of Education and Educational Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter R. Webster
    • 1
  1. 1.Northwestern UniversityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations