Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbook of Research in Arts Education ((SIHE,volume 16))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnheim, R. (1966). Towards a psychology of art. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artist. (n.d.). Retrieved June 26, 2005, from http://www.lilycomix.com/

  • Boughton, D. (2004). Assessing art learning in changing contexts: High stakes accountability, international standards and changing conceptions of artistic development. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education. Reston, VA: NAEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boughton, D., Freedman, K., Hausman, J., Hicks, L., Madeja, S., Metcalfe, S. et al. (2002). Art education and visual culture. NAEA Advisory. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, K. (1994). Artistic beginnings: The work of young Edvard Munch. Studies in Art Education, 36 (1), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. J. (1985). Young children’s representational drawings of solid objects: A comparison of drawing and copying. In N. Freeman & M. V. Cox (Eds.), Visual order: The nature of development of pictorial representation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. (1992). Children’s drawings. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszenmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. C. (1997). After the end of art. Contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, B. (1993–2001). Private communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, B. (1996). Au commencement etait l’image: Du dessin de l’enFangt a la communication de l’adulte. Paris: ESF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, B. (2002). Les formes du savoir et l’education aux images. Recherches en communication, 18, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, B., & Kindler, A. M. (1993). Emergence de L’Imagerie: Entre L’Essence at L’Accident. Mediascope, 6, 82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (1991). Artistry lost: U-shaped development in graphic symbolization. Doctoral dissertation. Harvard Graduate School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (1997a). The “U” and the wheel of “C:” Development and devaluation of graphic symbolization and the cognitive approach at Harvard Project Zero. In A. M. Kindler (Ed.), Child development in art (pp. 46–58). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (1997b). Drawing demise: U-shaped development in graphic symbolization. Studies in Art Education, 38 (3), 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncum, P. (1986). Breaking down the U-curve of artistic development. Visual Arts Research, 12 (1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncum, P. (2001). Visual culture: Developments, definitions and directions for art education. Studies in Art Education, 42 (4), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, S. (1993). First drawings. Pleasant Hill, CA: Exelord.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 169–188). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franciscono, M. (1998). Paul Klee and children’s art. In J. Fineberg (Ed.), Discovering child art. Essays on childhood, primitivism and modernism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art. New York, NY and Reston, VA: Teachers College Press and National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, K., & Stuhr, P. (2004). Curriculum changes for the 21st century: Visual culture in art education. In E. Eisner & D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 815–828). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, N. H. (1980). Strategies of representation in young children: Analysis of spatial skills and drawing processes. London, UK: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, N. H. (1995). The emergence of a framework theory of pictorial reasoning. In C. Lange-Kutter & G. V. Thomas (Eds.), Drawing and looking. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1982). First intimations of artistry. In S. Strauss (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golomb, C. (1992). The child’s creation of a pictorial world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golomb, C. (1995). The development of gifted child artists. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golomb, C. (2002). Child art in context: A cultural and comparative perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1 (1), 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E., & Davis, S. (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: the evolving – systems approach to creative thinking. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 243–270). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, M. A. (1985). There is no development in art. In N. H. Freeman & M. V. Cox (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. D. (1998). Visual intelligence. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (1994). Artistic learning in early childhood: A study of social interactions. Canadian Review of Art Education, 21 (2), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (1995). Significance of adult interactions in early childhood artistic development. In C. Thompson (Ed.) The visual arts in early childhood learning (pp. 10–15). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (1999). “From endpoints to repertoires:” A Challenge to art education. Studies in Art Education, 40 (4), 330–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (2001). From the U-curve to dragons: Culture and understanding of artistic development. Visual Arts Research, 26 (2), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (2003). Responding to the changing landscapes of art and childhood: A Systems approach to artistic development. Invited John Landrum Bryant Lecture. Harvard Graduate School of Education. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (2003a). Visual culture, visual brain and (art) education. Studies in Art Education, 44 (3), 290–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (2004). Researching impossible? Models of artistic development reconsidered. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education. Reston, VA: NAEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (2004a, December). Artistic development in the context of a changing world of art: Art education in/through the school and the art community. Keynote address presented at the Asia-Pacific Art Education Conference, Hong Kong, SAR, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M. (2005). Creativity and art education: A discourse informed by perspectives of three Asian artists. International Journal of Arts Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M., & Darras, B. (1994). Artistic development in context: Emergence and development of pictorial imagery in early childhood years. Visual Arts Research, 20 (2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M., & Darras, B. (1997). Map of artistic development. In A. M. Kindler (Ed.), Child development in art. Reston, VA: NAEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M., & Darras, B. (1997a). Development of pictorial representation: A teleology-based model. Journal of Art and Design Education, 16 (3), 217–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M., & Darras, B. (1998). Culture and development of pictorial repertoires. Studies in Art Education, 39 (2), 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M., Lai, V. M. H., & Ma, K. S. (2002). Artists as sources for concept formation. Research proposal. Hong Kong Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M., Liu, W. C., Pariser, D., & van den Berg, A. (2003). A cultural perspective on graphic development: Aesthetic assessment of local and foreign drawings in Taiwan. Research in Arts Education, May (5), 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M., Pariser, D., van den Berg, & Liu, W. C. (2002). Visions of Eden: The differential effects of skill on adults’ judgments of children drawings: Two cross-cultural studies. Canadian Review of Art Education, 28 (2), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, A. M., Pariser, D., van den Berg, A., Liu, W.C., & Dias, B. (2002). Aesthetic modernism, the first among equals? A look at aesthetic value systems in cross-cultural, age and visual arts educated and non-visual arts educated judging cohorts. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8 (2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenfeld, V. (1943). Creative and mental growth. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luquet, G. H. (1927). Le dessin enfantin. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFee, J. K. (1966) Society, art and education. In Mattil, E. (Ed.), A seminar in art education for research and curriculum development (pp. 122–140). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, C. (1998). Patterns of artistic development in children. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, G. (1991). Toulouse-Lautrec: The formative years, 1878–1891. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, S. (1987). The childhood and adolescent drawings of Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1884–1901). Drawings from 6 to 18 Years. Journal of Art and Design Education, 6 (3), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, D. (1987). The juvenile drawings of Klee, Toulouse-Lautrec and Picasso. Visual Arts Research, 13 (20), 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, D. (1991). Normal and unusual aspects of juvenile artistic development in Klee, Toulouse-Lautrec and Picasso: A review of findings and directions for further research. Creativity Research Journal, 3 (1), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, D. (1995). Lautrec – Gifted child artist and artistic momentum: Connections between juvenile and mature work. In C. Golomb (Ed.), The development of artistically gifted children (pp. 31–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, D. (1997). Graphic development in artistically exceptional children. In A. M. Kindler (Ed.), Child development in art. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, D., & van den Berg, A. (1997). The mind of the beholder: Some provisional doubts about the U-curve aesthetic development thesis. Studies in Art Education, 38 (3), 158–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porath, M. (1997). A developmental model of artistic giftedness in middle childhood. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 201–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reith, E. (1990). Development of representational awareness and competence in drawing production. Archives de Psychologies, 58, 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. (1999, October 28–November 14). Discomfort zones. A dress made of meat, and other enticements from Jane Sterbak. Citipaper.net. Retrieved from http://citypaper.net/articles/102899/ae.art.shtml

  • Simonton, D. K. (1990). Political pathology and societal creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavin, K. M. (2000). Teaching in and through visual culture. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-cultural Research in Art Education, 18 (1), 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavin, K. M. (2005). Opening re-marks: Critical antecedents of visual culture in art education. Studies in Art Education, 47 (1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willats, J. (1997). Art and representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (2003). Of diagrams and rhizomes: Visual culture, contemporary art, and the impossibility of mapping the content of art education. Studies in Art Education, 44 (3), 214–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1977). An iconoclastic view of the imagery sources in the drawings of young people. Art Education, 30 (1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1985). The artistic tower of Babel: Inextricable links between cultural and graphic development. Visual Arts Research, 11 (1), 90–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D. (1994). Development as the growth of repertoires. In M. B. Franklin & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Development and the arts (pp. 59–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D., & Perry, M. (1988). From endpoints to repertoires: Some new conclusions about drawing development. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22 (1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Composition in Context: A Nordic Perspective Sweden

  • Ahlner Malmström, E. (1998). En analys av sexåringars bildspråk (An Analysis of the Six Year Child’s Pictorial Language). Diss. Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. (1994). Social Scaling and Children’s Graphic Strategies. Diss. Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Änggård, E. (2005). Bildskapande – en del av förskolebarns kamratkulturer (Making Pictures: a Part of Preschool Children’s Peer Cultures). Diss. Linköping University

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, K. (1997). Barns världar – barns bilder (Children’s Worlds – Children’s Pictures). Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, K., & Andersson, S. (1996). Social Scaling in Children’s Drawings of Classroom Life. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendroth Karlsson, M. (1996). Bildprojekt i förskola och skola (Visual Arts Projects in Preschool and School). Diss. Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flensborg, I. (1994). Rumopfattelser i børns billeder (Spatial Perceptions and Representations in Children’s Pictures). Diss. The Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, H., Nordström, G.Z., Pedersen, K., & Stafseng, O. (1991). Barns bildspråk – Children’s Pictorial Language. Stockholm: Carlssons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illeris, H. (2002). Billedet, pædagogikken og magten (Picture, Education and Power). Diss. The Danish University of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, R., & Pedersen, K. (1978). Børns billedproduktion i en billedkultur (Children’s Picture Making in a Visual Culture). Bredsten, Denmark: Ulrika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, L. (1995). Budskap i barns bilder (Messages in Children’s Pictures). Bild i skolan, 2, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, L. (Ed.) (2000). The Cultural Context. Stockholm Institute of Education Press (SLOC 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1969). Creative and Mental Growth, 4th ed. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, U. (2001). Förskolan som lärandekontext för barns bildskapande (Preschool as a Learning Context for Children’s Pictorial Activity). Diss. Gothenburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, U. (2004). Barns bildskapande (Children’s Pictorial Activity). Jönköping University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. M. (1994). Køn og symbollag i børns billeder (Gender and Symbolic Layers in Children’s Pictures). Diss. The Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, L. M. (2000). Drawing and Spatial Representations. Diss. Oslo School of Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, K. (1997). Teorier og temaer i børnbilledforskning (Theories and Themes in Research on Children’s Pictures). Copenhagen: Dansklærerforeningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, K. (1999). Bo’s billedbog: en drengs billedmœssige socialization (Bo’s Picture Book: a Boy’s Pictorial Socialization). Diss. The Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohjakallio, P. (2005). Miksi kuvista? Koulun kuvataideopetuksen muuttuvat perustelut (Art Education, Why? The Changing Justifications for Art Education in Schools). Diss. University of Art and Design, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1977). An iconoclastic view of the imagery sources in the drawings of young people. Art Education, 30 (1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kindler, A.M. (2007). Composing in Visual Arts. In: Bresler, L. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Arts Education. Springer International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3052-9_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics