Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science ((BSPS,volume 241))

Robert Stauffer first gave prominence to the circumstance that Ørsted’s discovery of electromagnetism was intimately connected, at least in Ørsted’s own mind, with his rather deep philosophical engagement with both Kant’s philosophy of science, as presented in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science of 1786, and the further development of this philosophy within post-Kantian German Naturphilosophie, especially as represented by Schelling. Building on Stauffer’s contribution, L. Pearce Williams developed a more general picture of the development of electromagnetic theory—especially in the work of Faraday but also placing particular emphasis on Ørsted—as resting on a profound deviation from the Newtonian tradition due to Naturphilosophie and ultimately to Kant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beiser, Frederick (2002). German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caneva, Kenneth (1997). “Physics and Naturphilosophie: A Reconnaissance”. History of Science 35: 35–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst (1920). Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit. Dritter Band: Die Nachkantischen Systeme. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst (1950). The Problem of Knowledge: Philosophy, Science, and History since Hegel. Translated by W. Woglom and C. Hendel. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cat, Jordi (2001). “On Understanding: Maxwell on the Methods of Illustration and Scientific Metaphor”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32: 395–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Dan (1995). “The Ørsted-Ritter Partnership and the Birth of Romantic Natural Philosophy”. Annals of Science 52: 153–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förster, Eckart (2000). Kant’s Final Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Paul (forthcoming). “What should Kantians learn from Maimon’s Skepticism?” In G. Freudenthal, ed. The Philosophy of Salomon Maimon and its Place in the Enlightenment. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Michael (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Michael (2001). Dynamics of Reason. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, Barry (1973). “Speculation in Physics: The History and Practice of Naturphilosophie”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3: 301–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelved, Karen, Andrew Jackson, and Ole Knuden, eds. (1998). Selected Scientific Works of Hans Christian Ørsted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel (2002). Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Translated by M. Friedman. In H. Allison and P. Heath, eds. Immanuel Kant: Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas (1959). “Energy Conservation as an Example of Simultaneous Discovery”. In M. Clagett, ed. Critical Problems in the History of Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac (1931). Opticks. London: G. Bell and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ørsted, Hans Christian (1920). Naturvidenskabelige Skrifter (Scientific Papers). 3 vols. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Society of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, Josiah (1919). Lectures on Modern Idealism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm (1848). Friedrich Wilhelm Josef von Schellings Sämmtliche Werke. Zweiter Band. Stuttgart und Augsberg: J. G. Cotta’scher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm (1988). Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature. Translated by E. Harris and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, Timothy (1989). “Kant, Naturphilosophie, and Ørsted’s Discovery of Electromagnetism: A Reassessment”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20: 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, Robert (1957). “Speculation and Experiment in the Background of Ørsted’s Discovery of Electromagnetism”. Isis 48: 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. Pearce (1965). Michael Faraday: A Biography. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. Pearce (1966). The Origins of Field Theory. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. Pearce (1973). “Kant, Naturphilosophie and Scientific Method”. In R. Giere and R. Westfall, eds. Foundations of Scientific Method in the Nineteenth Century. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Friedman, M. (2007). Kant—Naturphilosophie—Electromagnetism. In: Brain, R.M., Cohen, R.S., Knudsen, O. (eds) Hans Christian Ørsted And The Romantic Legacy In Science. Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science, vol 241. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2987-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics