Abstract
The discovery of incommensurability is one of the most amazing and far-reaching accomplishments of early Greek mathematics. It is all the more amazing because, according to ancient tradition, the discovery was made at a time when Greek mathematical science was still in its infancy and apparently concerned with the most elementary, or, as many modern mathematicians are inclined to say, most trivial, problems, while at the same time, as recent discoveries have shown, the Egyptians and Babylonians had already elaborated very highly developed and complicated methods for the solution of mathematical problems of a higher order, and yet, as far as we can see, never even suspected the existence of the problem.
This article owes much to discussions of the early history of Greek mathematics which were carried on more than ten years ago between the author and Professor S. Bochner, now of Princeton University. This does not mean, of course, that Dr. Bochner has any part in whatever deficiencies the present article may have.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Hasse and H. Scholz, Die Grundlagenkrisis der griechischen Mathematik, Charlottenburg, Kurt Metzner, 1928, pp. 10 ff.
For the date see K. von Fritz, Pythagorean Politics in Southern Italy (Columbia University Press, 1940), pp. 77 ff.
Schol. in Plat. Phaed. 108d; see Scholia Platonica, ed. W. Chase Greene (Philol. Monographs publ. by Am. Philol. Ass., vol. VIII, 1938), p. 15. All the passages quoted in notes 18–24 are also collected, though sometimes in a slightly abbreviated form, in H. Diels, Vorsokratiker, Vol. 1.
This is also the case with the word horos designating the terms of a ratio or a proportion. See K. von Fritz, Philosophie und sprachlicher Ausdruck bei Demokrit, Platon und Aristoteles ( New York, Stechert, 1938 ), p. 69.
For details see my article on Oinopides of Chios in Pauly-Wissowa Realencyclopaedie, vol. 17, p. 2260–67.
Proclus, In primum Euclid. elem. librum Comment., p. 426 Friedlein.
For the various possibilities see the lucid exposition of Th. Heath in his commentated translation of Euclid’s Elements (Cambridge 1926), vol. 1, pp. 352 ff.
The proof attributed to the Pythagoreans by Eudemus seems to presuppose the famous fifth postulate of Euclid. But Aristotle (An. Pr., 65a, 4) indicates that there existed an old mathematical
See Euclid, Elements, V, def. 5 and Scholia in Euclid. Element. V. 3 (Euclidis Opera. ed. I. L. Heiberg, vol. V, Leipzig, Teubner, 1889, p. 282.)
See K. von Fritz, ‘Die Lebenszeit des Eudoxos von Knidos’ in Philologus, 85 (1930). p. 478 ff.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Fritz, K. (2004). The Discovery of Incommensurability by Hippasus of Metapontum. In: Christianidis, J. (eds) Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 240. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2640-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2640-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5850-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2640-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive
