Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 239))

Abstract

What causes ocean water to rise and fall between high tide and low tide levels twice a day at sea ports and shorelines? Over the course of the seventeenth century, European natural philosophers began to believe that the “flux and reflux of the sea” could be a very meaningful physical phenomenon. Their interest was stirred by the debate over Copernicus and the idea that the earth rotated on its own axis and orbited around the sun. The unsolved problem of the cause of the tides proved to be productive subject matter for Copernican and anti-Copernican authors alike. It was most productive of all, perhaps, for Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Palmieri, “Re-examining Galileo’s Theory.”

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galilei, Dialogo [Gentile e.a. ] .

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paolo Rossi has described, for example, the astrological works of Francesco Patrizi (1591), wherein the rise and fall of the masses of ocean water in tidal flux and reflux were attributed to the influence and influx of natural heat from the sun and moon, and likened to the rise of water boiling in a pot. Rossi, Aspetti della rivoluzione scientifica, pp.17o-171.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stevin, Principal Works [Crone e.a.], III, p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. Pannekoek’s Summary of the Work in ibid., p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Copernicus, On the Revolutions [DobrzyckI e.a.], p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. II6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drake, Galileo Studies, pp. 200–213. J. Renn, P. Damerow, S. Rieger, & D. Guilini have recently provided a much richer account of the discussions and collaborations between Galileo and Sarpi in the realm of mechanics and on the matter of the tides. See Renn e.a., “Hunting the White Elephant.”

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quoted in ibid., p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., pp. 201–202. Drake reports that paragraphs 569, 570, and 571, had earlier been published in Sarpi, Scritti.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galilei, Dialogue [Drake], pp. 427–428.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], vol. 2, p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  15. There are many accounts and discussions of this exchange between Galileo and Kepler. Drake’s account may be found at Drake, Galileo at Work, pp. 40–42, for example.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gilbert, De Magnete [Fleury Mottelay].

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gilbert, De Magnete [Fleury Mottelay], pp. 34o-341.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 337.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kepler, Life and Letters [Baumgardt], pp. 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kepler, New Astronomy [Donahue], pp. 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kepler, Harmony of the World [Aition e.a. ] . Kepler’s remarks on the tides occur in Chapter Seven of Book Four, entitled “Epilogue on Sublunary Nature and on the Inferior Faculties of the Soul, Especially Those on which Astrology Depends.,

    Google Scholar 

  23. Galileo, ”Discorso del Flusso e Reflusso del Mare;’ in Le Opere [ Favaro ] , v, pp. 377–395. An English translation of the Discorso is found in Finocchiaro (ed.), The Galileo Affair, pp. 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Finocchiaro (ed.), The Galileo Affair, p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bacon, ”On the Ebb and Flow?’ The interested reader should also see Paolo Rossi’s discussion of Bacon and Galileo on the tides in Rossi, Aspetti della rivoluzione scientifica.ca. pp.151–222.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bacon, The New Organon [Anderson], bk. 2, aphorism 36, pp. 191–202, and aphorism 46, pp. 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bacon, “On the Ebb and Flow,” p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid. pp. 67, 69.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid. p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid., pp. 73, 75, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rossi, Aspetti della rivoluzione scientifica, pp. 151–222.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Quoted by Drake, Galileo at Work, p. 274.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bacon, The New Organon [Anderson], p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Galilei, Dialogue [Drake], pp. 446–447.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid., p. 448.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ibid., pp. 417–418.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Drake’s note to this passage tells us this prelate was Marcantonio de Dominis, whose work was Euripus sive sententia de fluxu et refluxu maris (Roma, 1624).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Drake’s note to this passage points out that this was the view of Galileo’s old professor of physics and medicine, Girolamo Borro, stated in Del Flusso e reflusso del mare e dell’inondatione del Nilo (Firenze, 1583).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Galilei, Dialogue [Drake], pp. 419–420.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., pp. 432–433. 46 Ibid., p. 442.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid., pp. 432–433.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid., p. 442.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., p. 444.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid., pp. 445–446.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., p. 447

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid., pp. 452–453.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gassendi, Opera omnia, II, pp. 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wallis, “Letter on the Flux and Reflux.”

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid., p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid., p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., pp. 269–270.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid., pp. 271–272.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid., pp. 272–273.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hooper, W. (2004). Seventeenth-Century Theories of the Tides as a Gauge of Scientific Change. In: Palmerino, C.R., Thijssen, J.M.M.H. (eds) The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 239. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2455-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2455-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6658-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2455-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics