Advertisement

Fundamentals of Spatio-Temporal Fourier Spectroscopy in Quantitative Acoustic Microscopy

  • S. A. Titov
  • R. G. Maev
  • A. N. Bogatchenkov
Part of the Acoustical Imaging book series (ACIM, volume 27)

Abstract

Recently many methods have been proposed in acoustic microscopy for quantitative material characterization [1] — [11]. In typical measurement scheme, the output voltage of the transducer is recorded as a function of time and relative position of the transducer and the specimen. The velocity and attenuation of the leaky surface acoustic waves and the reflectance function for the immersion liquid—specimen interface can be obtained from the recorded data.

Keywords

Rayleigh Wave Azimuth Angle Acoustical Image Reflectance Function Acoustic Microscopy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Liang K.K., Kino G.S. and Khuri-Yakub B.T. (1985) Material characterization by the inversion of V(z), IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrasonics, SU-32, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alleyne D. and Cawley P. (1991) A two—dimensional Fourier transform method for the measurement of propagating multimode signals, J. Acoust. Soc Am., 89, 1159–1168.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fei D. and Chimenti D.E. (2001) Rapid dispersion curve mapping and material property estimation in plates, in D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, 20, 1368–1375.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pluta M., Schubert M., Jahny J. and Grill W. (2000) Angular spectrum approach for the computation of group and phase velocity surface of acoustic waves in anisotropic materials, Ultrasonics, 38, 232–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Titov S. and Maev R. (1997) Doppler continuous wave scanning acoustic microscope, Proc. of IEEE Ultrason. Symp., 713–718.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Titov S. and Maev R. (2000) Angular spectrum approach to time—resolve acoustic microscopy, Proc. of 25 Int. Acoustical Imaging Symp., 247–252.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Titov S.A., Maev R.G. and Bogachenkov A.N. (2000) Measurement of the velocity and attenuation of leaky surface acoustic waves by an ultrasonic microscope with two focusing transducers, Russ. Ultrason., 30, no. 6,269–274.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vines R.E., Tamura S. and Wolfe J.P. (1995) Surface acoustic wave focusing and induced Rayleigh waves, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 2729–2732,ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith R., Sinclair D.A. and Wickramasinghe H.K. (1980) Acoustic microscopy of elastic constants, Proc, 1980 Ultrason Synip., 677–682.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lobkis O.I. and Chimenti D.E. (1999) Three—dimensional transducer voltage in anisotropic materials characterization, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 106. 36–45.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maev R.G., Levin V.M. (1997) Principles of local sound velocity and attenuation measurements using transmission acoustic microscope, IEEE Trans. Ultrasonic, Ferroelectrics and Frequency control, 44, 1224–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Titov
    • 1
  • R. G. Maev
    • 2
  • A. N. Bogatchenkov
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of ScienceMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Centre for Imaging Research and Advanced Material CharacterizationUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations