Advertisement

Geographers and Sustainability: A Missing Connection?

  • James C. Eflin

Abstract

As geography matured during the 20th century, it followed a course that might appear, to outsiders at least, as a series of distributary channels — rather than coming together in a coherent and unified flow. Schisms among geographers and competing identities for their discipline risk impairing geography’s effectiveness to provide tangible solutions to problems plaguing Planet Earth (Hanson 1999). Although this parallels changes in some other disciplines, it also carries with it the potential for unraveling the sinews that give strength to its disciplinary project.

Keywords

Ecological Footprint Sustainability Science Natural Step World Commission World Summit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annan, K. 2001. Address to the Association of American Geographers, 1 March 2001 in New York City, Association of American Geographers. AAG Newsletter 36(4): 10–12.Google Scholar
  2. Annan, K. 2002. Quoted in Johannesburg Summit, 2002: United Nations Website for the World Summit on Sustainable Development; see http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/html/whats_new/feature_story39.htm. Accessed 4 October 2002.
  3. Chambers, N., C. Simmons, and M. Wackernagel. 2000. Sharing Nature’s Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  4. Hanson, S. 1999. Isms and Schisms: Healing the Rift Between Nature-Society and SpaceSociety Traditions in Human Geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89(1): 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harvey, D. 1973. Social Justice and the City. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kates, R. W., W. C. Clark, R. Corell, J. M. Hall, C. C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J. J. McCarthy, H. J. Schellnhuber, B. Bolin, N. M. Dickson, S. Faucheux, G. C. Gallopin, A. Gruebler, B. Huntley, J. Jäger, N. S. Jodha, R. E. Kasperson, A. Mabogunhe, P. Matson, H. Mooney, B. Moore III, T. O’Riordan, and U. Svedin, 2001. Sustainability Science. Science 292: 641–642. Also published as Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper RWP00–018, December 2000; see http://sust.harvard.edu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kates, R. W. 2002. Humboldt’s Dream, Beyond Disciplines, and Sustainability Science: Contested Identities in a Restructuring Academy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92(1): 9–81.Google Scholar
  8. The Natural Step, 2001/2002. Intro to Sustainability: What is The Natural Step Framework? and The Natural Step Four System Conditions. See http://www.naturalstep.org/framework/framework_overview.html. Accessed 9 March 2003.
  9. Thomas, W. L., C. O. Sauer, M. Bates, and L. Mumford, eds. 1956. Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Turner, B. L. II, ed. 1990. The Earth as Transformed by Human Action: Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere Over the Past 300 Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Turner, B. L. II. 2002. Contested Identities: Human-Environment Geography and Disciplinary Implications in a Restructuring Academy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92(1): 52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. WCED World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • James C. Eflin
    • 1
  1. 1.Ball State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations