Skip to main content

Garbage in, Garbage out

Data issues in supertree construction

  • Chapter
Phylogenetic Supertrees

Part of the book series: Computational Biology ((COBO,volume 4))

Abstract

As in conventional phylogenetic analyses, issues surrounding the source data are paramount in the supertree construction, but have received insufficient attention. In supertree construction, however, the source data represent phylogenetic trees rather than primary character data. This presents several supertree-specific problems. In this paper, we examine several key data issues for supertree construction, including data set non-independence, taxonomy of terminal taxa, and the question of what constitutes a valid source tree. Throughout, we present our suggested protocol for source tree collection and manipulation based on our experiences in building a supertree of mammals. Other protocols and decisions are naturally possible. What is important is that all collection protocols are presented explicitly and address minimally the issues that we have identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, M., Donoghue, M. J., and Sober, E. 1991. Against consensus. Systematic Zoology 40:486–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, B. R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, B. R. and Ragan, M. A. 2004. The MRP method. In O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds (ed). Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life, pp. 17–34. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. 2000. Factors influencing phylogenetic inference: a case study using the mammalian carnivores. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16:113–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. In press. The phylogenetic position of the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca): a historical consensus through supertree analysis. In D. G. Lindburg and K. Baragona (eds), Pandas: Biology and Conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. and Bryant, H. N. 1998. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. Systematic Biology 47:497–508.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Gittleman, J. L., and Purvis, A. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biological Reviews 74:143–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Gittleman, J. L., and Steel, M. A. 2002. The (super)tree of life: procedures, problems, and prospects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Jones, K. E., Price, S. A., Grenyer, R., Cardillo, M., Habib, M., Purvis, A., and Gittleman, J. L. 2003. Supertrees are a necessary not-so-evil: a comment on Gatesy et al. Systematic Biology 52:724–729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. and Sanderson, M. J. 2001. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation with parsimony supertree construction. Systematic Biology 50:565–579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, P. and Semple, C. 2004. A supertree algorithm for nested taxa. In O. R. P. Bininda Emonds (ed.), Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life, pp. 151–171. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubin, V., Gouy, M., and Perrière, G. 2001. Bacterial molecular phylogeny using supertree approach. Genome Informatics 12:155–164.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daubin, V., Gouy, M., and Perrière, G. 2002. A phylogenomic approach to bacterial phylogeny: evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history. Genome Research 12:1080–1090.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Queiroz, A., Donoghue, M. J., and Kim, J. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:657–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatesy, J., Matthee, C., Desalle, R., and Hayashi, C. 2002. Resolution of a supertree / supermatrix paradox. Systematic Biology 51:652–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gatesy, J. and Springer, M. S. 2004. A critique of matrix representation with parsimony supertrees. In O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds (ed.), Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life, pp. 369–388. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenner, R. A. 2001. Bilaterian phylogeny and uncritical recycling of morphological data sets. Systematic Biology 50:730–742.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. E., Purvis, A., Maclarnon, A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., and Simmons, N. B. 2002. A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biological Reviews 77:223–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. and Page, R. D. M. 2002. Seabird supertrees: combining partial estimates of procellariiform phylogeny. The Auk 119:88–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38:7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F.-G. R., Miyamoto, M. M., Freire, N. P., Ong, P. Q., Tennant, M. R., Young, T. S., and Gugel, K. F. 2001. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals. Science 291:1786–1789.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46:523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malia, M. J., Jr., Lipscomb, D. L., and Allard, M. W. 2003. The misleading effects of composite taxa in supermatrices. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27:522–527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. D. M. 2004. Taxonomy, supertrees, and the Tree of Life. In O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds (ed). Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life, pp. 247–265. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piel, W. H., Donoghue, M. J., and Sanderson, M. J. 2002. Tree BASE: a database of phylogenetic knowledge. In K. Shimura, K. L. Wilson, and D. Gordon (eds), To the Interoperable Catalogue of Life with Partners — Species 2000 Asia Oceania. Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop of Species 2000, pp. 41–47. National Institute of Environmental Studies (Research Report R-171–2002), Tsukuba, Japan. (http://www.nies.go.jp/kanko/kenkyu/pdf/r-171–2002.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisani, D., Yates, A. M., Langer, M. C., and Benton, M. J. 2002. A genus-level supertree of the Dinosauria. Proceedings of the Royal Society ofLondon B 269:915–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, A. 1995a. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 348:405–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, A. 1995b. A modification to Baum and Ragan ’s method for combining phylogenetic trees. Systematic Biology 44:251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragan, M. A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1:53–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. J., Donoghue, M. J., Piel, W., and Eriksson, T. 1994. Tree BASE: a prototype database of phylogenetic analyses and an interactive tool for browsing the phylogeny of life. American Journal of Botany 81:183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, M. S. and De Jong, W. W. 2001. Phylogenetics. Which mammalian supertree to bark up? Science 291:1709–1711.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, C. J., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., and Caro, T. M. 2003. The adaptive significance of coloration in lagomorphs. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79:309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, M., Thorley, J. L., Pisani, D., Lapointe, F.J., and Mcinerney, J. O. 2004. Some desiderata for liberal supertrees. In O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds (ed.), Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life, pp. 227–246. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss, A. R. and Flynn, J. J. 1993. A phylogenetic analysis and definition of the Carnivora. In F. S. Szalay, M. J. Novacek, and M. C. McKenna (eds), Mammalian Phylogeny: Placentals, pp. 32–52. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Jones, K.E., Price, S.A., Cardillo, M., Grenyer, R., Purvis, A. (2004). Garbage in, Garbage out. In: Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P. (eds) Phylogenetic Supertrees. Computational Biology, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2330-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2330-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2329-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2330-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics