Subjective Quality of Life and Self-Esteem in Children: the Role of Primary and Secondary Control in Coping With Everyday Stress
- 207 Downloads
Two major predictors of subjective quality of life (SQOL) in adults are known to be self-esteem and a sense of primary control. Moreover, secondary control is known to be an important defence strategy when primary control fails. This study aimed to determine whether these relationships also apply to children. A sample of 66 children aged from 5 to 12 years were compared on their use of primary and secondary control and on their ratings of SQOL and self-esteem. SQOL was measured using the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale, self-esteem by using the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory, and primary and secondary control were measured by coding children’s responses to three short video clips of children in stressful situations. It was found that younger children use more primary control and less secondary control than older children. However, five year olds were found capable of producing secondary control strategies. Contrary to expectation, primary and secondary control did not predict either self-esteem or SQOL. However, self-esteem predicted SQOL as expected and no sex differences were found. These findings emphasise important differences from the adult literature and the reasons for this are discussed.
KeywordsLife Satisfaction Subjective Quality Primary Control Control Response Secondary Control
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Coopersmith, S.: 1981, Coopersmith Self Esteem Inventories (Consulting Psychologists Press Inc., California).Google Scholar
- Cummins, R.A.: 1997a, Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale-Adult: ComOolA5, 5th ed. (School Of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne).Google Scholar
- Cummins, R.A.: 1997b, Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale-Intellectual/ Cognitive Disability: ComQol-I5, 5th edition (School Of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne).Google Scholar
- Cummins, R.A.: (1999), ‘A psychometric evaluation of the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale’, in L.L. Yuan, B. Yuen and C. Low (eds.), Urban Quality of Life: Critical Issues and Options, 5th ed. (National University of Singapore, Singapore), pp. 32–46.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R.A.: 2000a, ‘A homeostatic model for subjective quality of life’, Proceedings, Second Conference of Quality of Life in Cities (National University of Singapore, Singapore), pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R.A.: 2003, ‘Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model’, Social Indicators Research (in press).Google Scholar
- Headey, B. and A. Wearing: 1992, Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-being (Longman Cheshire, Melbourne).Google Scholar
- Heckhausen, J. and R. Schulz: 1995, ‘A life-span theory of control’, Psychological Bulletin 102, pp. 284–304.Google Scholar
- Hetherington, M.E.: 1984, ‘Stress and coping in children and families’, New Directions for Child Development 24, pp. 7–33.Google Scholar
- Petito, F.: 1998, ‘An evaluation of primary and secondary control processes on the subjective quality of life of adolescents’, unpublished masters thesis, Deakin University.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B.G. and L.S. Fidell: 1989, Using Multivariate Statistics, 2nd ed. (Harper and Row Publishers, New York).Google Scholar