Advertisement

Subjective Quality of Life and Self-Esteem in Children: the Role of Primary and Secondary Control in Coping With Everyday Stress

  • Karen Marriage
  • Robert A. Cummins
Chapter
  • 207 Downloads
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 23)

Abstract

Two major predictors of subjective quality of life (SQOL) in adults are known to be self-esteem and a sense of primary control. Moreover, secondary control is known to be an important defence strategy when primary control fails. This study aimed to determine whether these relationships also apply to children. A sample of 66 children aged from 5 to 12 years were compared on their use of primary and secondary control and on their ratings of SQOL and self-esteem. SQOL was measured using the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale, self-esteem by using the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory, and primary and secondary control were measured by coding children’s responses to three short video clips of children in stressful situations. It was found that younger children use more primary control and less secondary control than older children. However, five year olds were found capable of producing secondary control strategies. Contrary to expectation, primary and secondary control did not predict either self-esteem or SQOL. However, self-esteem predicted SQOL as expected and no sex differences were found. These findings emphasise important differences from the adult literature and the reasons for this are discussed.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Subjective Quality Primary Control Control Response Secondary Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altshuler, J.L. and D.N. Ruble: 1989, ‘Developmental changes in children’s awareness of strategies for coping with uncontrollable stress’, Child Development 60, pp. 1337–1349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Band, E.B.: 1990, ‘Children’s coping with diabetes: Understanding the role of cognitive development’, Journal of Pediatric Psychology 15, pp. 27–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Band, E.B. and J.R. Weisz: 1988, ‘How to feel better when it feels bad: Children’s perspectives on coping with everyday stress’, Developmental Psychology 24, pp. 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Band, E.B. and J.R. Weisz: 1990, ‘Developmental differences in primary and secondary control coping and adjustment to juvenile diabetes’, Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 19, pp. 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle, G.J.: 1991, ‘Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency of item redundancy in psychometric scales?’ , Personality and Individual Differences 12, pp. 291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collette, J.: 1984, ‘Sex differences in life satisfaction: Australian data’, Journal of Gerontology 39, pp. 243–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Compas, B.E., G.A. Bancz, V. Maleame and N. Worsham: 1991, ‘Perceived control and coping with stress: A developmental perspective’, Journal of Social Issues 47, pp. 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coopersmith, S.: 1981, Coopersmith Self Esteem Inventories (Consulting Psychologists Press Inc., California).Google Scholar
  9. Cummins, R.A.: 1995, ‘On the trail of the gold-standard for SQOL’, Social Indicators Research 35, pp. 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cummins, R.A.: 1996, ‘The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos’, Social Indicators Research 38, pp. 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, R.A.: 1997a, Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale-Adult: ComOolA5, 5th ed. (School Of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne).Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, R.A.: 1997b, Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale-Intellectual/ Cognitive Disability: ComQol-I5, 5th edition (School Of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne).Google Scholar
  13. Cummins, R.A.: 1998, ‘The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction’, Social Indicators Research 43, pp. 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cummins, R.A.: (1999), ‘A psychometric evaluation of the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale’, in L.L. Yuan, B. Yuen and C. Low (eds.), Urban Quality of Life: Critical Issues and Options, 5th ed. (National University of Singapore, Singapore), pp. 32–46.Google Scholar
  15. Cummins, R.A.: 2000a, ‘A homeostatic model for subjective quality of life’, Proceedings, Second Conference of Quality of Life in Cities (National University of Singapore, Singapore), pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
  16. Cummins, R.A.: 2000b, ‘Personal income and subjective well-being: A review’, Journal of Happiness Studies 1, pp. 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummins, R.A.: 2002, ‘Proxy responding for subjective well-being: A review’, International Review of Research in Mental Retardation 25, pp. 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cummins, R.A.: 2003, ‘Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model’, Social Indicators Research (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E. and M. Diener: 1995, ‘Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self esteem’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, pp. 653–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feiner, R.D., M.A. Ginter, M.F. Boike and E.L. Cowen: 1981, ‘Parental death or divorce and the school adjustment of young children’, American Journal of Community Psychology 9, pp. 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Headey, B. and A. Wearing: 1992, Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-being (Longman Cheshire, Melbourne).Google Scholar
  22. Heckhausen, J. and R. Schulz: 1993, ‘Optimisation by selection and compensation: Balancing primary and secondary control in the life span development’, International Journal of Behavioral Development 16, pp. 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heckhausen, J. and R. Schulz: 1995, ‘A life-span theory of control’, Psychological Bulletin 102, pp. 284–304.Google Scholar
  24. Hetherington, M.E.: 1984, ‘Stress and coping in children and families’, New Directions for Child Development 24, pp. 7–33.Google Scholar
  25. Hoare, P.: 1993, ‘The quality of life of children with chronic epilepsy and their families’, Seizure 2, pp. 269–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Larson, R.: 1989, ‘Is feeling ‘in control’ related to happiness in daily life?’, Psychological Reports 64, pp. 775–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liang, J.: 1984, ‘Dimensions of the satisfaction with life index: A structural formulation’, Journal of Gerontology 39, pp. 613–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nespoli, L., A.P. Verri, F. Locatelli, L. Bertuggia, R.M. Taibi and G.R. Burgio: 1995, ‘The impact of paediatric bone marrow transplantation on quality of life’, Quality of Life Research 4, pp. 233–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petito, F.: 1998, ‘An evaluation of primary and secondary control processes on the subjective quality of life of adolescents’, unpublished masters thesis, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  30. Rothbaum, F., J.R. Weisz and S.S. Snyder: 1982, ‘Changing the world and changing the self. A two-process model of perceived control’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42, pp. 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schulz, R. and S. Decker: 1985, ‘Long-term adjustment to physical disability: The role of social support, perceived control, and self blame’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, pp. 1162–1172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tabachnick, B.G. and L.S. Fidell: 1989, Using Multivariate Statistics, 2nd ed. (Harper and Row Publishers, New York).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Marriage
    • 1
  • Robert A. Cummins
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityBurwood, VictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations