Abstract
Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is the fastestgrowing dialysis treatment in the world at the present time. The evolution of this treatment modality is closely linked to the development of new automatic machines and to the recent advances in prescription and monitoring of peritonal dialysis (PD) treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Diaz-Buxo JA, Suki WN. Automated peritoneal dialysis. In: Gokal R, Nolph KD, editors. The Textbook of Peritoneal Dialysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994;399–418.
Popovich RP, Moncrief JW, Nolph KD, Ghods AJ, Twardowski ZJ, Pyle WK. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88:449–56.
Diaz-Buxo JA, Farmer CD, Walker PJ, Chandler JT, Holt KL. Continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis: a preliminary report. Artif Organs. 1981;5:157–61.
Price CG, Suki WN. Newer modifications of peritoneal dialysis: options in the treatment of patients with renal failure. Am J Nephrol. 1981;1:97–104.
McComb J, Morton AR, Singer MA, Hopman WM, MacKenzie T. Impact of portable APD on patient perception of health-related quality of life. Adv Perit Dial. 1997; 13:137–40.
US Renal Data System, CD ROM version 1997.
Twardowski ZJ. Peritoneal dialysis glossary II. Pert Dial Int. 1988;8:15–17.
Durand PY, Slingeneyer A, Benevent D, Chanliau J. CAPD: peritoneal clearances with a 5th nocturnal automated exchange (Baxter Quantum). Perit Dial Int. 1997;17(Suppl. 1): 515 (abstract).
Blake P, Burkart JM, Churchill DN et al. Recommended clinical practices for maximizing peritoneal dialysis clearances. Pert Dial Int. 1996;16:448–56.
Keshaviah P, Emerson PF, Vonesh EF, Brandes JC. Relationship between body size, fill volume, and mass transfer area coefficient in peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994;4:1820–6.
Durand PY, Chanliau J, Gamberoni J, Hestin D, Kessler M. APD: clinical measurement of the maximal acceptable intraperitoneal volume. Adv Pert Dial. 1994;10:63–7.
Twardowski ZJ, Nolph KD, Khanna R et al. Peritoneal equilibration test. Pert Dial Bull. 1987;7:138–47.
Twardowski ZJ. Clinical value of standardised tests in CAPD patients. Blood Purif. 1989;7:95–108.
Durand PY, Freida P, Issad B, Chanliau J. How to reach optimal creatinine clearance in automated peritoneal dialysis. Pert Dial Int. 1996;16(Suppl. 1):S167–70.
Ronco C, Amici G, Feriani M, Virga G. Automated peritoneal dialysis. Contrib Nephrol. Karger Basel. 1999:129.
Amici GP, Virga GB, Ronco C. Automated peritoneal dialysis: when and to do it. Proceedings of the ISPD ′98. The VIII Congress of the ISPD, August 23/26 1998 Seoul, Korea. Peritoneal Dialysis International 1999;19(2):117–22.
Holley JL, Piraino B. Careful patient selection and dialysis prescription are required for effective nightly intermittent peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 1994;14:155–8.
Friedlander MA, Rahman M, Tessman MJ, Hanslik TM, Ferrara KA, Newman LN. Variability in calculations of dialysis adequacy in patients using nightly intermittent peritoneal dialysis compared to CAPD. Adv Pert Dial. 1995;11:93–6.
Piraino B, Bender F, Bernardini J. A comparison of clearances on tidal peritoneal dialysis and intermittent peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 1994;14:145–8.
Steinhauer HB, Keck I, Lubrich-Birkner I, Schollmeyer P. Increased dialysis efficiency in tidal peritoneal dialysis compared to intermittent peritoneal dialysis. Nephron. 1991;58:500–1.
Flanigan MJ, Doyle C, Lim VS, Ullrich G. Tidal peritoneal dialysis: preliminary experience. Pert Dial Int. 1992;12: 304–8.
Brandes JC, Packard WJ, Watters SK, Fritsche C. Optimization of dialysate flow and mass transfer during automated peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;25:603–10.
Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF, Nolph KD, Martinez AJ, Lampton LM. High volume, low frequency continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 1983;23:64–70.
Freida PH, Issad B, Allouache M. Relationships between fill volume, small solute clearances, and net ultrafiltration during a standardized APD program. Pert Dial Int. 1998; 18:124 (abstract).
National Kidney Foundation. Computer-Assisted Kinetic Modeling Approach to Achieving Target Doses of Peritoneal Dialysis. NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30(3 Suppl. 2):S90–2.
Vonesh EF, Lysaght MJ, Moran J, Farrell P. Kinetic modeling as a prescription aid in peritoneal dialysis. Blood Purif. 1991;9:246–70.
Vonesh EF, Burkart J, McMurray SD, Williams PF. Peritoneal dialysis kinetic modeling: validation in a multicenter clinical study. Pert Dial Int. 1996;16:471–81.
Rippe B, Stelin G, Haraldsson B. Computer simulations of peritoneal fluid transport in CAPD. Kidney Int. 1991;40:315–25.
Haraldsson B. Assessing the peritoneal dialysis capacities of individual patients. Kidney Int. 1995;47:1187–98.
Gotch FA, Keen ML. Kinetic modeling in peritoneal dialysis. In: Nissenson AR, Fine RN, Gentile DE, editors. Clinical Dialysis, 3rd edn. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange, 1996:343–75.
Gotch FA, Lipps BJ, Keen ML, Panlilio F. Computerized urea kinetic modeling to prescribe and monitor delivered Kt/V (pKt/V, dKt/V) in peritoneal dialysis. Adv Perit Dial. 1996;12:43–5.
Amici G, Mastrosimone S, Da Rin G, Bocci C. Bonadonna A. Clinical validation of PD Adequest software: modeling error assessment. Pert Dial Int. 1998;18:317–21.
Verrina E, Amici G, Perfumo F, Trivelli A, Canepa A, Gusmano R. The use of the PD Adequest mathematical model in pediatric patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 1998;18:322–8.
Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Van Stone JC. The peak urea concentration hypothesis: a urea kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of CAPD and hemodialysis. Pert Dial Int. 1989;9:257–60.
National Kidney Foundation. III. Measurement of peritoneal dialysis dose. NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30(3 Suppl. 2):S80–2.
National Kidney Foundation. V. Adequate dose of peritoneal dialysis. NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 30(3 Suppl. 2):S86–92.
Keshaviah PR, Star RA. A new approach to dialysis quantification: an adequacy index based on solute removal. Semin Dial. 1994;7:85–90.
Keshaviah PR. The solute removal index — a unified basis for comparing disparate therapies. Perit Dial Int. 1995;15: 101–4.
Ronco C, Bosch JP, Lew SQ et al. Adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: comparison with other dialysis techniques. Kidney Int. 1994;46(Suppl. 48):S18–24.
Amici G, Calzavara P, Da Rin G, Bocci C, Calconi G. Solute removal index (SRI) and equivalent renal clearance (EKR) for dialysis dose quantification in CAPD, APD and standard HD. Pert Dial Int. 1998;18(Suppl. 1):S11 (abstract).
Canaud B, Garred LJ, Argiles A, Flavier JL, Bouloux C, Mion C. Creatinine kinetic modelling: a simple and reliable tool for the asessment of protein nutritional status in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995;10: 1405–10.
Amici G, Virga G, Da Rin G, Bocci C. KtIV target calculation in automated tidal PD treatment using solute removal index. Pert Dial Int. 1998;18:101 (abstract).
Chen HH, Shetty A, Afthentopoulos IE, Oreopulos DG. Discrepancy between weekly Kt/V and weekly creatinine clearances in patients on CAPD. Adv Pert Dial. 1995;11: 83–7.
Tzamaloukas AH, Murata GH, Piraino B et al. Peritoneal urea and creatinine clearance in continuous peritoneal dialysis patients with different types of peritoneal solute transport. Kidney Int. 1998;53:1405–11.
Mehrotra R, Saran R, Nolph KD, Moore HL, Khanna R. Evidence that urea is a better surrogate marker of uremic toxicity than creatinine. ASAIO J. 1997;43:M858–61.
Amici G, Mastrosimone S, Virga G, Da Rin G, Bocci C. Variability of adequacy indices derived from 24 h collections in APD. Pert Dial Int. 1998;18:101 (abstract).
Rodby RA, Firanek CA, Cheng YG, Korbet SM. Reproducibility of studies of peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Kidney Int. 1996;50:267–71.
Churchill DN, Taylor DW, Keshaviah PR. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:198–207.
Diaz-Buxo JA. Enhancement of peritoneal dialysis: the PD plus concept. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996;27:92–8.
Korbet SM, Vonesh EF, Firanek CA. Peritonitis in an urban peritoneal dialysis program: an analysis of infecting pathogens. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26:47–53.
Vande Walle J, Raes A, Castillo D, Lutz-Dettinger N, Dejaegher A. Advantages of HCO3 solution with low sodium concentration over standard lactate solutions for acute peritoneal dialysis. Adv Pert Dial. 1997;13:179–82.
Struijk DG, Douma CE. Future research in peritoneal dialysis fluids. Semin Dial. 1998;11:207–12.
Canepa A, Perfumo F, Carrea A et al. Long-term effects of amino acid solutions in children on automated peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:1441 (abstract).
Leblanc M, Moreno L, Robinson O, Tapolyai M, Paganini EP. Bicarbonate dialysate for continuous renal replacement therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6:497 (abstract).
Ash SR, Janle EM. Continuous flow-through peritoneal dialysis (CFPD): comparison of efficiency to IPD, TPD, and CAPD in an animal model. Pert Dial Int. 1997;17: 365–72.
Steele M, Kwan JT. Potential problem: delayed detection of peritonitis by patients receiving home automated peritoneal dialysis. Pert Dial Int. 1997;17:617.
Ronco C, Brendolan A, Zanella M. Evolution of machines for automated peritoneal dialysis. Contrib Nephrol. 1999;129:142–61.
Ronco C, Diaz-Buxo JA. Automated peritoneal dialysis. Nephron 2001;87:1–7.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ronco, C., Feriani, M., Dell’Aquila, R. (2004). Machines for automated peritoneal dialysis. In: Hörl, W.H., Koch, K.M., Lindsay, R.M., Ronco, C., Winchester, J.F. (eds) Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2275-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2275-3_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-015-7012-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2275-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive