Skip to main content

The welfare of pigs and minipigs

  • Chapter
The Welfare of Laboratory Animals

Part of the book series: Animal Welfare ((AWNS,volume 2))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Apple JK, Craig JV. The influence of pen size on toy preference of growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1992; 35:149-155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARC, Agricultural Research Council. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Arey DS, Franklin MF. Efffects of straw and unfamiliarity on fighting between newly mixed growing pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995; 45:23-30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett JL, Cronin GM, McCallum TH, Newman EA. Effects of food and time of day on aggression when grouping unfamiliar adult pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1994; 39:339-347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie VE, Walker N, Sneddon IA. Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Anim Welf 1995; 4:207-220

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen PJA. Nutrition of Göttingen minipigs, a study of the influence of ad libitum and restricted feeding on the physiology of the Göttingen minipig. Thesis, Biomedical Laboratory, University of Southern Denmark 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen P, Ellegaard L. The Göttingen minipig in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacol Toxicol 1997; 80(Suppl 2):3-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen PJA, Hansen AK, Rasmussen HJ. The Laboratory Swine. CRC Press, Boca Raton 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM. Indicators of poor welfare. Br Vet J 1986; 142:524-526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broom DM, Johnson KG. Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall, London 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustad LK, McClellan RO, Burns MP. Swine in Biomedical Research. Frayn & McClellan, Seattle 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. Third report from the commission to the council and the European parliament on the statistics on the number of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes in the member states of the European Union. Brussels 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortesini R. Ethical aspects in xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc 1998; 30:2463-2464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha TJ. Nutritional requirements of the pig. In Swine in Biomedical Research. Bustad LK, McClellan RO, Burns MP eds, Frayn & McClellan, Seattle 1966; 681-695

    Google Scholar 

  • Daar AS. Xenotransplantation and cloning: working with the World Health Organization to develop ethical guiding principles. Transplant Proc 2000; 32:1549-1550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate. Annual report 2001. Copenhagen 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS. From an animals point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behav Brain Sci 1990; 13:1-61

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Pigs 2003; http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfare/farmed/pigs/ Dettmers A. On nutrition of the miniature pigs at the Hormel Institute. Lab Anim Care 1968; 18 (1):116-119

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial. Xenotransplantation, time to leave the laboratory. The Lancet 1999;354 (9191):1657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization. FAO statistical database, agriculture2002; http://apps.fao.org

  • Fishman JA. Xenotransplantation from swine, making a list, checking it twice. Xenotranplantation 2000; 7:93-95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D. Selection of bedded and unbedded areas by pigs in relation to environmental temperature and behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1985; 14:117-126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser AF, Broom D. Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Wallingford, CAB International 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D, Bernon DE, Ball RO. Enhanced attraction to blood by pigs with inadequate dietary protein supplementation. Can J Anim Sci 1991; 71:611-619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev J, Georgieva R, Kehrer A, Weil S. Relationship between environmental temperature, humidity and energy conversion in the Gottinger miniature pig. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztlicher Wochenschrift 1977; 90(20):392-396

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giles J, Knight J. Dolly's death leaves researchers woolly on clone ageing issue. Nature 2003; 421:776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grandin T, Curtis SE. Toy preferences in young pigs. J Anim Sci 1984; 59(Suppl 1):85

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves HB. Behaviour and ecology of wild and feral swine (Sus Scrofa). J Anim Sci 1984; 58:482-492

    Google Scholar 

  • GV-Solas, Gesellschaft fuer Versuchstierkunde/Society for Laboratory Animal Science. Futtercomponente und ihr Einsatz bei Versuchstiere. Mitteilungen des Ausschusses fuer Ernaehrung der Versuchstiere, Berlin 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffner RS, Heffner HE. Hearing in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) and goats (Capra hircus). Hear Res 1990; 48(3):231-240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz W, Bollen P. Pigs and minipigs. In The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals. Poole TB ed, Blackwell Scientific, London 1999; 464-488

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlone JJ, Désaultés C, Morméde P and Heup P. Genetics of behaviour. In The Genetics of the Pig. Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky A eds, CAB International, Wallingford 1998; 295-311

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon AJ, Edwards SA, Stephens DB, Walters DE. Behaviour of groups of weaner pigs in three different housing systems. Br Vet J 1989; 145:367-392

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mount LE, Ingram DL. The Pig as a Laboratory Animal. Academic Press, London 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottle MB, d'Aprice AJF, Cowan PJ, Boquest AC, Harrison SJ, Grupen CG. Transgenic perspectives in xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2002; 9 (5): 305-308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NRC, National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. National Academy Press, Washington 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson K. Xenotransplantation and animal welfare. Transplant Proc 2000; 32:1172-1173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennisi E, Vogel G. Clones, a hard act to follow. Science 2000; 288:1722-1727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen V. The development of feeding and investigatory behaviour in free-ranging domestic pigs during their first 18 weeks of life. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1994; 42:87-98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pond WG, Mersmann HJ. Biology of the Domestic Pig. Ithaca, Cornell University Press 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter V. Pigs, a Handbook of the Breeds of the World. Helm Information, Mountfield 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Pursel VG, Miller FK, Bolt DJ, Pinkert CA, Hammer RE, Palmiter RD, Brintster RI. Insertion of growth hormone genes into pig embryos. In Biotechnology of Growth Regulation. Heap RB, Prosser CG, Lamming GE eds, Butterworths, London 1989a; 181-188

    Google Scholar 

  • Pursel VG, Pinkert CA, Miller FK, Bolt DJ, Campbell RG, Palmiter RD, Brintster RI, Hammer RE. Genetic engineering of livestock. Science 1989b; 244:1282-1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Pursel VG, Hammer RE, Bolt DJ, Palmiter RD, Brintster RI. Integration, expression and germline transmission of growth related genes. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1990; 41:77-87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritskes-Hoitinga J, Bollen P. Nutrition of (Göttingen) minipigs: facts, assumptions and mysteries. Pharmacol Toxicol 1997; 80(Suppl 2):5-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schrøder-Petersen DL, Simonsen HB. Tail biting in pigs. Vet J 2001; 162:196-210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoolder HAM, Burbidge, JA, Edwards SA, Simmins PH, Lawrence AB. Provision of straw as a foraging substrate reduces the development of excessive chain and bar manipulation in food restricted sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995; 43:249-262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton HC, Mersmann HJ. Swine in Cardiovascular Research, vol. 1-2. CRC Press, Boca Raton 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Swindle MM. Basic Surgical Exercises using Swine. Praeger, New York 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Swindle MM. Swine as Models in Biomedical Research. Iowa State University Press, Ames 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsumi H, Morikawa R, Niki R, Tanigawa M. Acclimatisation and response of minipigs toward humans. Lab Anim 2001; 35:236-242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker A, Belcher C, Moloo B, Bell J, Mazzulli T, Humar A, Hughes A, McArdle P, Talbot A. The production of transgenic pigs for potential use in clinical xenotransplantation, microbiological evaluation. Xenotransplantation 2002a; 9:191-202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker A, Belcher C, Moloo B, Bell J, Mazzulli T, Humar A, Hughes A, McArdle P, Talbot A. The production of transgenic pigs for potential use in clinical xenotransplantation, baseline clinical pathology and organ size studies. Xenotransplantation 2002b; 9:203-208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tumbleson ME. Swine in Biomedical Research, vol. 1-3. Plenum Press, New York 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumbleson ME, Schook LB. Advances in Swine in Biomedical Research, vol. 1-2. Plenum Press, New York 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida M, Shimatsu Y, Onoe K, Matsuyama N, Niki R, Ikeda JE, Imai H. Production of transgenic miniature pigs by pronuclear microinjection. Transgenic Res 2001; 10 (6): 577-582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer M. Transgenesis and animal welfare. Thesis, Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Utrecht University 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zutphen LFM, Baumans V, Beynen AC. Principles of Laboratory Animal Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Borell E, Hurnik JF. Understanding stereotypies. Pig Internat 1991; 4:27-29

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Borell E, Broom DM, Csermeley D, Dijkhuizen AA, Edwards SA, Jensen P, Madec Cneva F, Stamataris C. The Welfare of Intensively Kept Pigs. Report of the Scientific Veterinary Committee, European Commission, Doc XXIV/B3/ScVC/0005/1997 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Gush DGM, Jensen P, Algers B. Behaviour of pigs in a novel semi-natural environment. Biol Behav 1990; 15:62-73

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Gush DGM, Vestergaard K. Inquisitive Exploration in Pigs. Anim Behav 1993; 45:185-187

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bollen, P., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. (2007). The welfare of pigs and minipigs. In: Kaliste, E. (eds) The Welfare of Laboratory Animals. Animal Welfare, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2271-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics