Ethical Issues in Clinical Genetics and the Indian Subcontinent

  • Michael Parker


The day-to-day practice of clinical genetics, and of medicine more widely, requires the making not only of scientific and technical judgements, but also of judgements of ‘value’. These may be explicit, such as when, for example, a doctor or nurse reflects on her own moral views about the permissibility of abortion. Often however, value judgements in medicine are implicit in what might appear at first glance to be ‘clinical’ decisions. Health professionals may not always think of themselves as making value judgements, for example, when considering what would be in an incompetent patient’s ‘best interests’; when weighing up whether harm to a third party is sufficiently ‘serious’ to justify a breach of patient confidentiality, or when assessing ‘quality of life’. Nevertheless, it is clear on reflection that these decisions do indeed involve the making of value judgements. Good health care practice requires that value judgements such as these are properly analysed and assessed, just as scientific and technical evidence should be properly evaluated and ‘evidence-based’. Health professionals must be prepared to justify their decisions both with regard to the scientific basis of the decision, and the ethical values by which it is guided. Evidence-based medicine requires interventions to be justified on the existence of evidence for the intervention’s effectiveness, and not on other grounds, such as that it is traditional practice, or on the authority of the clinician. It is increasingly recognised that a ‘value judgement’ has to be ‘evidence based’.


Health Professional Ethical Issue Indian Subcontinent Moral Theory Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beauchamp, T and Childress, J (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics (Fourth Edition) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Buchanan, A., Brock, D., Daniels, N. and Wikler, D (2000) From chance to choice: genetics and justice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke, A (1998) The genetic testing of children Oxford: Bios Scientific.Google Scholar
  4. Hope, T., Savulescu, J. and Hendrick, J (2003) Medical Ethics and Law: the core curriculum. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone.Google Scholar
  5. Kant, I (2001) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Originally 1785].Google Scholar
  6. Lucassen, A. and Parker, M (2001) Revealing False Paternity: some ethical considerations. Lancet 357: 1033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marteau, T. and Richards, M (1996) The troubled helix: social and psychologicalimplications of the new human genetics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Parker, M. and Lucassen, A (2002) Concern for families and individuals in clinical genetics. Journal of Medical Ethics.Google Scholar
  9. Shaw, A (2000) Kinship and Continuity: Pakistani Families in Britain Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Parker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations