Abstract
In his The Poverty of Historicism 1 K.R. Popper and before him F. Kaufmann2 distinguish two broad classes of epistemological and methodological positions held in the social sciences: Antinaturalistic positions and pronaturalistic positions. These positions are distinguished with respect to their attitude regarding the applicability of the methods of the natural sciences, or rather what the representatives of the anti and pronaturalistic positions assume to be the method of the natural sciences. According to Popper and Kaufmann the representatives of antinaturalistic positions hold that the methods of the natural sciences can not be applied in the social sciences, whereas the representatives of the pronaturalistic positions have the opposite view. This of course raises the question what views the representatives of the anti and pronaturalistic positions embrace with respect to the methods of the natural sciences. It is interesting to note, however, that Popper in his The Poverty of Historicism, indicates those views only briefly, the reasons presumably being the special tasks and aims he set himself in that analysis. These are primarily to show the disastrous political and social consequences of a false social science methodology and the invalidity of the ideas of historical necessity and that of laws of historical development. But it is well known that Popper analysed and discussed the methods and the philosophy of science with great rigour and acumen in his other books and articles and that he triggered a philosophical revolution in that field.3 Before Popper the prevailing
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blaug, M. (1978), Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hayek, F.A. (1949), ‘Individualism: True and False’, in: F.A. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Hayek F.A.(1967), ‘Degrees of Explanation’, in: F.A. Hayek, Studies in Philosophy and Economics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Hermann, B.W. (1832), Staatswirthschafitliche Untersuchungen. München.
Hufeland, G. (1807), Neue Grundlegung der Staatswirthschaftskunst, Gießen und Wetzlar
Hume, D. (1964), Treatise of Human Nature, Scientia Verlag Aalen;
Kaufmann, F. (1999), Methodenlehre der Sozialwissenschaften. Springer Wien New Vnrk
Knies, K. (1853), Politische Oekonomie nach geschichtlicher Methode, Braunschweig.
Marx, K. (1922), Das Kapital, Otto Meißners Verlag. Hamburg.
Meinecke, F. (1965), Zur Theorie und Philosophie der Geschichte, (Hrsg. E. Kessel) in: F. Meinecke, Werke Bd. IV, (Hrsg. H. Herzfeld, C. Hinrichs, W. Hofer), K.F. Koehler Verlag, Stuttgart.
Menger, C. (1871), Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Wien 1871.
Menger, C. (1883/1985), Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschafiten und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere, Leipzig. Translated and edited by L. Schneider, Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics, New York.
Milford, K. (1989), Zu den Lösungsversuchen des Insduktionsproblems und des Abgrenzungsproblems bei Carl Meager, Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien.
Milford, K. (1995), ‘Roscher’s epistemological and methodological position and its importance for the Methodenstreit’, in Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 22, Nr. 3/4/5; MCB University Press Ltd.
Milford, K. (1997), ‘Hufeland als Vorläufer von Menger und Hayek’, in: Wert, Meinung, Bedeutung: Die Tradition der subjektiven Wertlehre in der deutschen Nationalökonomie, (hrsg. B. P. Priddat), Metropolis, Marburg.
Milford, K. (1990) ‘Menger’s Methodology’, in: History of Political Economy, Vol. 22a, (ed. B. Caldwell), Durham.
Mill, J.S. (1974), A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, University of Toronto Press, Toronto Buffalo.
Miller, D. (1994), Critical Rationalism, A Restatement and Defence, Open Court Illinnic
Popper, K.R. (1957), The Poverty of Historicism, Routledge and Kegan Paul. London.
Popper, K.R. (1959), The Logic of Scientifiic Discovery. Hutchinson London.
Popper, K. R. (1963), Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul. London.
Popper, K.R. (1966), The Open Society and its Enemies, Routledge and Kegan Paul- London.
Popper, K.R. (1972), Objective Knowledge, Oxford.
Popper, K.R. (1979), Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Tübingen.
Popper, K.R. (1982), The Open Universe, an Argument for Indeterminism, (ed. W.W. Bartley, III) Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, New Jersey 1982.
Popper, K.R. (1983), Realism and the Aim of Science. (ed. W. W. Bartley. III), Hutchinson. Tnndon
Popper, K.R. (1994), ‘Models, Instruments, and Truth’, in: K.R. Popper, The Myth of the Framework, (ed. M.A. Notturno), Routledge, London and New York.
Rau, K.H. (1826), Grundsätze der Volkswirthschaftslehre. Winter. Heidelberg.
Roscher, W. (1842), Leben, Werk und Zeitalter des Thukvdides. Göttingen.
Roscher, W. (1843), Grundrifß zu Vorlesungen iiber Staatswirthschaftt. Nach geschichtlicher Methode, Göttingen.
Roscher, W. (1874), Geschichte der Nationaloekonomik in Deutschland, München.
Roscher, W. (1886), Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie. Stuttgart.
Russell, B. (1961), A History of Western Philosophy, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London.
Schlick, M. (1974), General Theory of Knowledge, Library of Exact Philosophy 11, Springer, Wien New York.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1986), History of Economic Analysis, Allen and Unwin, London.
Smith, A. (1979), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Uxtord.
Watkins, J.W.N. (1974), ‘The Unity of Popper’s Thought’, in: P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. XIV, book I, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.
Weber, M. (1988), ‘Roscher und Knies und die logischen Probleme der historischen Nationalökonomie’, in: M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Milford, K. (2004). Inductivism in 19TH Century German Economics. In: Stadler, F. (eds) Induction and Deduction in the Sciences. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2196-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2196-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6555-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2196-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive