Supplying Planks For Neurath’s Boat: Can Economists Meet The Demands of The Dynamics of Scientific Theories?

  • Hans Rott
Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook book series (VCIY, volume 11)


According to Otto Neurath, the practice of science consists in a large undertaking of setting up and maintaining systems of statements: In unified science we try ... to create a consistent system of protocol statements and nonprotocol statements (including laws). When a new statement is presented to us we compare it with the system at our disposal and check whether the new statement is in contradiction with the system or not. If the new statement is in contradiction with the system, we can discard this statement as unusable (‘false’), for example, the statement: ‘In Africa lions sing only in major chords’ ; however, one can also ‘accept’ the statement and change the system accordingly so that it remains consistent if this statement is added. The statement may then be called ‘true’.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alchourrón, Carlos, Peter Gärdenfors and David Makinson: 1985, ‘On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction Functions and Their Associated Revision Functions’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boutilier, Craig: 1993, ‘Revision Sequences and Nested Conditionals’, in R. Bajcsy (ed.), IJCAI-93 Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 519–525.Google Scholar
  3. Boutilier, Craig: 1996, ‘Iterated Revision and Minimal Change of Conditional Beliefs’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 263–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broome, John: 1999, Ethics Out of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darwiche, Adnan, and Judea Pearl: 1994, ‘On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision’, in Ronald Fagin, ed., TARK ’94 Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Pacific Grove, Cal.: Morgan Kaufmann, 5–23.Google Scholar
  6. Darwiche, Adnan, and Judea Pearl: 1997, ‘On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision’, Artificial Intelligence 89, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Debreu, Gerard: 1959, Theory of Value, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Edgeworth, Francis Ysidro: 1881, Mathematical Psychics, Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  9. Gärdenfors, Peter: 1979, ‘Conditionals and Changes of Belief’, in Illkka Niiniluoto and Raimo Tuomela (eds.), ‘The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 30 (1978), nos. 2–4, 381–404.Google Scholar
  10. Gärdenfors, Peter: 1988, Knowledge in Flux. Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  11. Gärdenfors, Peter, and David Makinson: 1988, ‘Revisions of Knowledge Systems Using Epistemic Entrenchment’, in Moshe Vardi (ed.), TARK ’88 Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge, Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann, 83–95.Google Scholar
  12. Grove, Adam: 1988, ‘Two Modellings for Theory Change’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haller, Rudolf: 1982a, ‘New Light on the Vienna Circle’, The Monist 65, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haller, Rudolf: 1982b, ‘Das Neurath-Prinzip - Grundlagen und Folgerungen’, in Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Arbeiterbildung in der Zwischenkriegszeit, Locker, Wien, 79–87.Google Scholar
  15. Hansson, Sven Ove: 1999, A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating, Kluwer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansson, Sven Ove (ed.): 1997, Special Issue on ‘Non-Prioritized Belief Revision’, Theoria 63, 11–34.Google Scholar
  17. Hausman, Daniel: 1998, ‘Economics, Philosophy of’, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, electronic edition.Google Scholar
  18. Hausman, Daniel M., and Michael S. McPherson: 1996, Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Lehmann, Daniel: 2001, ‘Nonmonotonic Logics and Semantics’, Journal of Logic and Computation11, 229–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindström, Sten: 1991, ‘A Semantic Approach to Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Inference Operations and Choice’, Uppsala Prints and Preprints in Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Uppsala, 1991:6.Google Scholar
  21. Luce, R. Duncan, and Howard Raiffa: 1957, Gamnes and Decisions, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  22. McFadden, Daniel: 1999, ‘Rationality for Economists?’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moulin, Hervé: 1985, ‘Choice Functions over a Finite Set: A Summary’, Social Choice and Welfare 2, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nayak, Abhaya: 1994, ‘Iterated Belief Change Based on Epistemic Entrenchment’, Erkenntnis 41, 353–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nayak, Abhaya, Maurice Pagnucco and Pavlos Peppas: 2003, ‘Dynamic Belief Revision Operations’,Artificial Intelligence 146, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neurath, Otto: 1931, ‘Soziologie im Physikalismus’, Erkenntnis 2, 393–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neurath, Otto: 1931, English translation ‘Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism’ in O.N., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983, pp 58–90.Google Scholar
  28. Neurath, Otto: 1932/33, ‘Protokollsätze’, Erkenntnis 3, 204–214;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neurath, Otto: 1932/33, English translation ‘Protocol Statements’ in O.N., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983, pp 91–99.Google Scholar
  30. Neurath, Otto: 1934, ‘Radikaler Physikalismus und „Wirkliche Welt“’, Erkenntnis 4, 346–362;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neurath, Otto: 1934, English translation ‘Radical Physicalism and the “Real World”’ in O.N., Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, eds. Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath, Reidel, Dordrecht 1983, pp 100–114.Google Scholar
  32. Pagnucco, Maurice, and Hans Rott: 1999, ‘Severe Withdrawal (and Recovery)’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 28, 501–547. (Corrected reprint in the JPL issue of February 2000.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quine, Willard V.O., and Joseph S. Ullian: 1978, The Web of Belief, 2 second edition, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenberg, Alexander: 1983, ‘If Economics Isn’t Science, What Is It?’, Philosophical Forum 14, 296–314.Google Scholar
  35. Reprinted in E.D. Klemke et al. (eds.), Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science, 3rd edition, Prometheus Books, Amherst 1998, 154–170.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenberg, Alexander: 1995, ‘Philosophy of Economics’, in Robert Audi (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 582–583.Google Scholar
  37. Rott, Hans: 1993, ‘Belief Contraction in the Context of the General Theory of Rational Choice’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 58, 1426–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rott, Hans: 1999, ‘Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief. Part I: Finding the Right Framework’, Erkenntnis 50, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ron, Hans: 2000, ‘Two Dogmas of Belief Revision’, Journal of Philosophy 97, 503–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rott, Hans: 2001, Change, Choice and Inference, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rott, Hans: 2003a, ‘Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief. Part II: Iterated Belief Change Without Dispositional Coherence’, Journal of Logic and Computation 13, 111–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rott, Hans: 2003b, ‘A Counterexample to Six Fundamental Principles of Belief Formation’, manuscript, January 2003.Google Scholar
  43. Schlechta, Karl: 1996, ‘Some Completeness Results for Stoppered and Ranked Classical Preferential Models’, Journal of Logic and Computation 6, 599–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schlick, Moritz: 1934: ‘Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis’ in Erkenntnis 4, 79–99;Google Scholar
  45. Schlick, Moritz: 1934: English translation ‘The Foundation of Knowledge’, in Alfred J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism, New York, Free Press 1959, 209–227.Google Scholar
  46. Sen, Amartya K.: 1993, ‘Internal Consistency of Choice’, Econometrica61, 495–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sen, Amartya K.: 1995, ‘Is the Idea of Purely Internal Consistency of Choice Bizarre?’, in J. E. J. Altham and R. Harrison (eds.), World, Mind, and Ethics. Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spohn, Wolfgang: 2003, ‘Die Logik und das Induktionsproblem’, in Peter Schroeder-Heister und Wolfgang Spohn (eds.), Logik in der Philosophie, Synchron-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Rott

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations