Induction and Deduction in the Sciences pp 199-216 | Cite as

# Handling Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, and the Bayesian Controversy

Chapter

## Abstract

This paper is divided into two parts. In the first part (sections 2 and 3), I will describe briefly how advances in artificial intelligence (AI) in the 1970s led to the crucial problem of handling uncertainty, and how attempts to solve this problem led in turn to the emergence of the new theory of Bayesian networks. I will try to focus in this historical account on the key ideas and will not give a full account of the technical details. Then, in the second part (section 4), I will consider the implications of these new results for the long-standing controversy between Bayesians and non-Bayesians.

### Keywords

Clay Sulfide Pancreatitis Dine Bleach## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- 1.Jackson, P.,
*Introduction to expert systems*. Wokingham / England: Addison-Wesley 1986.Google Scholar - 2.E. H. Shortliffe & B.G. Buchanan, “A model of inexact reasoning in medicine”, in:
*Mathematical Biosciences,*23, 1975, pp. 351–79. The quotation is from p. 357.Google Scholar - 3.E.H. Shortliffe & B.G. Buchanan, “A model of inexact reasoning in medicine”, in:
*Mathematical Biosciences*, 23, 1975 pp. 352–5.Google Scholar - 4.F.T. de Dombal, D.J. Leaper, J.R. Staniland, A.P. McCann, & J.C. Horrocks, “Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain”, in:
*British Medical Journal*, 2, 1972, pp. 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.D.J. Leaper, J.C. Horrocks, J.R. Staniland, & F.T. de Dombal, “Computer-assisted diagnosis of abdominal pain using ‘estimates’ provided by clinicians”, in:
*British Medical Journal*, 4, 1972, pp. 350–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.D.J. Leaper, J.C. Horrocks, J.R. Staniland, & F.T. de Dombal, “Computer-assisted diagnosis of abdominal pain using ‘estimates’ provided by clinicians”, in:
*British Medical Journal*, 4, 1972, pp. 358–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.J.B. Adams, “A probability model of medical reasoning and the MYCIN model”, in:
*Mathematical Biosciences,*32, 1976, pp. 177–86.Google Scholar - 8.D. Heckerman, “Probabilistic interpretations for MYCIN’s certainty factors”, in: L.N. Kanal / J.F. Lemmer (Eds.),
*Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence*, Amsterdam: North-Holland 1986, pp. 167–96.Google Scholar - 9.J. Glaschnig, “Prospector: an expert system for mineral exploration”, in: D. Michie (Ed.),
*Introductory readings in expert systems*, New York: Gordon and Breach 1982, pp. 47–64.Google Scholar - 10.R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, & N.J. Nilsson, “Subjective Bayesian methods for rule-based inference systems”, in:
*Proceedings of the National Computer Conference (AFIPS)*, 45, 1976, pp. 1075–82. The quotation is from p. 1076.Google Scholar - 11.J. Pearl, “Bayesian networks: a model of self-activated memory for evidential reasoning”, in:
*Proceedings of t/he Cognitive Science Society,*Ablex, 1985b, pp. 329–34. The quotation is from**D.**330.Google Scholar - 12.J. Pearl, “Fusion, propagation and structuring in belief networks”, in:
*Artificial Intelligence,*29, 1986, pp. 241–88. The quotation is from pp. 253–4.Google Scholar - 13.J. Pearl, “Belief networks revisited”, in:
*Artifiicial Intelligence,*59, 1993, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar - 14.R.A. Howard & J.E. Matheson, “Influence diagrams”, in: R.A. Howard / J.E. Matheson (Eds.),
*The principles and applications of decision analysis,*Menlo Park/CA: Strategic Decisions Group 1984. Vol.2, pp. 721–62.Google Scholar - 15.J. Pearl, “Reverend Bayes on inference engines: a distributed hierarchical approach”, in:
*Proceedings of the national conference on AI (ASSSI-82),*1982, pp. 133–6.Google Scholar - 16.J.H. Kim & J. Pearl, “A computational model for combined causal and diagnostic reasoning in inference systems”, in:
*Proceedings of the 8th international joint conference on AI (IJCAI-85)*, 1983, p. 190–3.Google Scholar - 17.J. Pearl, “How to do with probabilities what people say you can’t”, in:
*Proceedings of the second IEEE conference on AI applications*, Miami/Fl., 1985a, pp. 6–12.Google Scholar - 18.J. Pearl,
*Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Networks of plausible inference*. San Mateo/California: Morgan Kaufmann 1988.Google Scholar - 19.S.L. Lauritzen & D.J. Spiegelhalter, “Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems (with discussion)”,
*in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B.*50, 1988, pp 157–224.Google Scholar - 20.J. Pearl, “Belief networks revisited”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 50, 1988, pp 52Google Scholar
- 21.H. Reichenbach,
*The direction of time*. Berkeley: University of California press 1956.Google Scholar - 22.C. Howson & P. Urbach,
*Scientific reasoning; the Bayesian approach*. La Salle/Illinois: Open court 1989.Google Scholar - 23.D. Miller,
*Critical rationalism*. Chicago and La Salle/Illinois: Open court 1994.Google Scholar - 24.D. Corfield / J. Williamson (Eds.),
*Foundations of Bayesianism*. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer 2001.Google Scholar - 25.K.R. Popper,
*The logic of scientific discovery*. 6^{th}impression of English translation of the original German 1934 edition. London: Hutchinson. 1972.Google Scholar - 26.D.A. Gillies, “Confiirmation theory”, in: D.M. Gabbay / P. Smets (Eds.),
*Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems,*Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer 1998, Volume 1, pp. 135–67. The arguments for Bayesianism for singular statements and nonBavesianism for universal statements are on nn- 154–5Google Scholar - 27.K. Ng & B. Abramson, “Uncertainty management in expert systems”, in:
*IEEE Expert*, 5, 1990, pp. 29–48.Google Scholar - 28.D.A. Gillies, “Debates on Bayesianism and the theory of Bayesian networks”, in:
*Tlheoria,*64, 1998, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar - 29.J. Pearl, “Bayesianism and causality, or, why I am only half-Bayesian”, in: D. Corfield / J. Williamson (Eds.),
*Foundations of Bayesianism*. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer 2001, pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 30.Lauritzen & Spiegelhalter, “Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems
*loc. cit.*(note 19) n. 159Google Scholar - 31.R.E. Neapolitan,
*Probabilistic reasoning in expert systems. Theory and algorithms*. New York: John Wiley 1990.Google Scholar - 32.de Dombal
*et al.,*“Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain”,*loc. cit.*(note 4).**p.**9.Google Scholar - 33.de Dombal
*et al.,*“Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain”,*loc. cit.*(note 4), p. 2.Google Scholar - 34.Leaper
*et al.,*“Computer-assisted diagnosis of abdominal pain using `estimates’ provided by clinicians”. loc.*cit.*(note 5), nn-3351–2Google Scholar - 35.Leaper
*et al.,*“Computer-assisted diagnosis of abdominal pain using `estimates’ provided by clinicians”,*loc. cit.*(note 5).**p.**353.Google Scholar - 36.L.E. Sucar,
*Probabilistic reasoning in knowledge-based vision systems*. PhD thesis, Imperial College, University of London 1991.Google Scholar - 37.L.E. Sucar, D.F. Gillies, & D.A. Gillies, “Objective probabilities in expert systems”, in:
*Artificial Intelligence*, 61, 1993, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar - 38.L.E. Sucar, D.F. Gillies, & D.A. Gillies, “Objective probabilities in expert systems”, in:
*Artificial Intelligence*, 61, 1993, pp. 187–208p. 206 for further details.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004