Terminal Sedation: A Substitute for Euthanasia?
By ‘terminal sedation’ I denote, in the present chapter, a procedure where through heavy sedation a terminally ill patient is put into a state of coma, where the intention of the doctor is that the patient should stay comatose until he or she is dead. No extraordinary monitoring of the medical state of the patient is undertaken. Normal hydration is ignored. All this means that in some cases where patients are being terminally sedated, death is hastened; if the disease does not kill the patient, some complication in relation to the sedation, or the withdrawal of treatment and hydration, or the combination of these, does.
KeywordsPalliative Care Active Killing Clinical Ethic Double Effect Palliative Medicine
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.The example is presented in, and is followed by, a discussion in several issues of the journal. See also the selective bibliography of the literature since 1990.Google Scholar
- 4.Lawrence J. Schneiderman, ‘Is it morally justifiable not to sedate this patient before ventilator withdrawal’ The Journal of Clinical Ethics Vol 2 1991: 129–130Google Scholar
- 5.Many philosophers have attempted to make this kind of distinction, most ingenious among them all, Jonathan Bennett. But in my opinion even Bennett fails. Those who want to check this assessment of mine should read his most recent treatment of the subject, which can be found in his book, The Act Itself (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1995), chapters 4 through 8.Google Scholar
- 6.An authoritative statement of the principle of double effect can be found in New Catholic Encyclopedia, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
- 7.Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland (1993).Google Scholar
- 8.‘The Additive Fallacy’, Ethics, 1988:5–31Google Scholar
- 9.American Association for Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Position statement on the end-of-life, Appendix of this volume, p. 128.Google Scholar
- 10.‘Palliative Options of Last Resort’, JAMA, Vol. 278, 1997. In this book reprinted as Chapter 1. p. 6.Google Scholar
- 11.Ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar
- 12.Ibid., pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
- 13.‘Is Sedation Without Hydration or Nourishment in Terminal Care Lawful?’, Medico-Legal Journal, Vol. 62, 1994:200.Google Scholar
- 14.Ibid.Google Scholar
- 15.At a meeting held at The National Board of Health and Welfare on Oct. 29. 1997.Google Scholar
- 16.Håkan Samuelsson and Eva Thornberg, ‘Symptomlindring inte dödshjälp’ (Symptom control is not euthanasia), Göteborgs-Posten. January 1. 1998.Google Scholar
- 17.This description it taken from M. O’Connor, D.W. Kissane, and O. Spruyt, ‘Sedation of the terminally ill — a clinical perspective’ Monash Bioethics Review. Vol 18 1999 n 22Google Scholar
- 18.Dag Lundberg, Psykologiska och etiska aspekter’ (Psychological and Ethical Aspects), in Matts Halldin and Sten G. Lindahl (eds.), Anestesi (Anaesthesia) (Stockholm: Liber, 1999), p 190. My own translation.Google Scholar
- 19.‘Sedation Before Ventilator Withdrawal: Medical and Ethical Considerations’, The Journal of Clinical Ethics, Vol. 2, 1991:127.Google Scholar
- 20.Guidelines on palliative sedation adopted by the Norwegian Medical Association, Appendix of this volume, p. 132–133.Google Scholar
- 21.‘Morphine Drips, Terminal Sedation, and Slow Euthanasia: Definitions and Facts, Not Anecdotes’, Journal of Palliative rare Vnl 1 1996.3dGoogle Scholar