Preverbs and their origins in Georgian and Udi

  • Alice C. Harris
Part of the Yearbook of Morphology book series (YOMO)

Abstract

The structure of the preverb + stem combination is superficially similar in Georgian, a member of the Kartvelian (South Caucasian) family, and in unrelated Udi, a member of the Lezgian group of the North East Caucasian family. Compare (1) and (2) in this regard. (1) Georgian: mi-v-i-t’an-e thither-1sg-cv-carry-aor ‘I took it (away)’2 (2) Udi: ta-zu-š-er-e thither-1sg-carry-er-aorII ‘I took it (away)’ Of interest here is the fact that in both languages the preverb (mi-, ta-) forms a semantic whole with the verb root (-t’an-,-š-), yet an agreement marker (v-, -ne-) occurs between them. This kind of interruption of a semantic and formal unit is a well recognized problem in linguistics (see, for example, Ackerman and Webelhuth 1998). In this paper it is shown that two quite different histories led to the situation found today and illustrated in (1–2).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, Werner (1997). The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the history of German: The case of the verbal genitive. Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, eds.Google Scholar
  2. Ans van Kemenade and Nigel Vincent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–61.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman, Farrell, and Gerd Webelhuth (1998). A Theory of Predicates. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
  4. Alekseev, M.E. (1985). Voprosy sravnitel’no-istoričeskoj grammatiki lezginskix jazykov: Morphologija. Sintaksis. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  5. Blake, Robert P. (1974). The Old Georgian version of the Gospel of Mark. Patrologia Orientalis 20, fascicle 3. (First edition, 1928.)Google Scholar
  6. Blake, Robert P. (1976). The Old Georgian version of the Gospel of Matthew. Patrologia Orientalis 24, fascicle 1. (First edition 1933.)Google Scholar
  7. Blake, Robert P. and Maurice Brière. (1950). The Old Georgian version of the Gospel of John. Patrologia Orientalis 26, fascicle 4.Google Scholar
  8. Brière, Maurice. (1955). La version géorgienne ancienne de L’évangile de Luc. Patrologia Orientalis 27, fascile 3.Google Scholar
  9. Cherchi, Marcello (1994). Verbal tmesis in Georgian. Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico Sezione Linguistica 16, 33–115.Google Scholar
  10. Cherchi, Marcello (1997). Verbal tmesis in Georgian, Part II. Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico Sezione Linguistica 19, 63–137.Google Scholar
  11. Deeters, Gerhard (1930). Das khartwelische Verbum. Leipzig: Markert & Petters.Google Scholar
  12. Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria, and Edwin Williams (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gamq’relize, T. (1959). Sibilant’ta šesat’ q’visobani da kartvelur enata uzvelesi st’rukt’uris zogi sak’itxi. [Sibilant correspondences and some questions of the most ancient structure of the Kartvelian languages.] Tbilisi: Ak’ademia.Google Scholar
  14. Giginejšvili, B.K. (1977). Sravnitel’naja fonetika dagestanskix jazykov. Tbilisi: Universitet.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, Alice C. (2000). Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language 76, 593–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris, Alice C. (2002). Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, Alice C. (to appear). The prehistory of Udi locative cases and locative preverbs. Festschrift for Howard I. Aronson, ed. Dee Ann Holisky and Kevin Tuite.Google Scholar
  18. Harris, Alice C., and Lyle Campbell (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Holisky, Dee Ann (1981). Aspect theory and Georgian aspect. Tense and Aspect (Syntax and Semantics, vol. 14), ed. P.J. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen. New York: Academic Press, 127–144.Google Scholar
  20. Imnaišvili, I. (1957). Saxelta bruneba da brunvata punkciebi zvel kartulši. [The declension of nouns and the functions of cases in Old Georgian.] Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.Google Scholar
  21. Jeiranišvili, Evg. (1956). Gramat’ik’uli k’lasis gakvavebuli nišnebi udur zmnebsa da nazmnar saxelebši [Fossilized markers of grammatical class in Udi verbs and deverbal nouns]. Iberiul-k’avk’aziuri enatmecniereba 8, 341–362.Google Scholar
  22. Jeiranišvili, Evg. (1971). Udiuri ena [The Udi language]. Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.Google Scholar
  23. Jorbenaze, B., M. K’obaize, and M. Berize (1988). Kartul enis morpemebisa da modaluri element’ebis leksik’oni. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
  24. Klimov, G.A. (1964). Ètymologičeskij slovar’ kartvel’skix jazykov. Moskva: Akademija.Google Scholar
  25. Klimov, Georgij A. (1998). Etymological Dictionary of the Kartvelian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  26. Mart’irosovi, Aram (1946). Tandebuli kartulši. [Adpositions in Georgian.] Iberiul-k’avk’aziuri enatmecniereba 1, 203–246.Google Scholar
  27. Mart’irosovi, A. (1956). C’indebulisa da tandebulis ist’oriuli urtiertobisatvis kartulši. [On the historical relationship between preverbs and postpositions in Georgian.] Iberiul-k’avk’aziuri enatmecniereba 8, 39–46.Google Scholar
  28. Nikolayev, S.L., and S.A. Starostin (1994). North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary. Moscow: Asterisk Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Pančvize, VI. (1974). Uduri enis gramat’ik’uli analizi. [A grammatical analysis of the Udi language.] Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
  30. Penrixi, Hainc (= Fähnrich, Heinz), and Zurab Sarjvelaze (1990). Kartvelur enata et’imologiuri leksik’oni. [Etymological dictionary of the Kartvelian languages.] Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.Google Scholar
  31. Plank, Frans (1980). Encoding grammatical relations: Acceptable and unacceptable non-distinctness. Historical Morphology, ed. Jacek Fisiak. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 289–326.Google Scholar
  32. Šanize, Ak’ak’i (1973 [1953]). Kartuli enis gramat’ik’is sapuzvlebi. [Fundamentals of the grammar of the Georgian language.] Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.Google Scholar
  33. Schmidt, Karl Horst (1969). Zur Tmesis in den Kartvelsprachen und ihren typologischen Parallelen in indogermanischen Sprachen. Giorgi Axvledians. Tbilisi: Universit’et’i, 96–105.Google Scholar
  34. Schulze, Wolfgang. ms (1988). Studien zur Rekonstruktion des Lautstandes der Süd-Ostkaukasischen (Lezgischen) Grundsprache. Bonn.Google Scholar
  35. Schulze, Wolfgang (1992). Zur Entwicklungsdynamik morphosyntaktischer Subsysteme. Caucasologie et mythologie comparée, ed. Catherine Peters. Paris: 335–362.Google Scholar
  36. Topuria, Varlam (1967 [1931]). Svanuri ena, I: Zmna [The Svan Language, I: The Verb]. [Published as volume I of his Šromebi [Works].] Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
  37. Tschenkéli, Kita (1958). Einführung in die georgische Sprache, Band 1. Zürich: Amirani.Google Scholar
  38. Vešap’ize, Irak’li (1967). Zmnisc’ini zvel kartul enaši. [The preverb in the Old Georgian language.] Tbilisi: Universit’et’i.Google Scholar
  39. Watkins, Calvert (1963). Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica 6, 1–49.Google Scholar
  40. Watkins, Calvert (1964). Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, ed. H.G. Lunt. The Hague: Mouton, 1035–1045.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice C. Harris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsSUNY Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations