Abstract
The intervention of government in the transport sector may be based on two different though related arguments. The first argument is based upon the quality of private decision making, in terms of the information available, the time scale adopted and the motives of the decision makers. As such it is fundamentally a critique of managerial efficiency in free enterprise systems. The second argument is more fundamental in that it identifies the reasons for intervention in the nature of transport itself. Among these are the ‘indirect’ nature of transport demand, and the important externalities associated with many aspects of transport which affect the efficiency of the transport sector itself and the economy and society as a whole. This case for government intervention is so strong that governments throughout the world, regardless of ideology, have accepted the need for intervention in the transport sector. In doing so they have developed new forms of project appraisal which are reviewed in the first section of this chapter. The remaining sections concern the provision of network capacity, the provision of public service vehicle capacity and the allocation of traffic to alternative modes.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
P. D. Henderson, Notes on public investment criteria in the United Kingdom, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics and Statistics, 27 (1965), pp 58–89.
D. Teichroew, A. A. Robichek and M. Montalbano, An analysis of criteria for investment and financing decisions under certainty, Management Science, 12 (1965), pp. 151–79.
C. D. Foster and M. E. Beesley, Estimating the social benefit of constructing an underground railway in London, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 126 (1963), pp. 46–58.
Henderson, loc. cit.
W. L. Garrison and M. E. Marts, Geographic Impact of Highway Improvement, University of Washington, Highway Economic Studies (1958), chapter 4.
Commission on the Third London Airport, Report, HMSO, London (1971), pp. 119–30.
Henderson, op. cit.
E. J. Mishan, A reappraisal of the principles of resource allocation, Economica, 24 (1957), p. 337.
H. C. Bos and L. M. Koyck, The Appraisal of Investments in Transportation Projects: a practical example, Netherland Economic Institute, Rotterdam (1958).
For a discussion of these categories see E. L. Ullman, Geographical prediction and theory, in S. B. Cohen, Problems and Trends in American Geography, Basic Books, New York (1967), pp. 124–45.
Ullman, op. cit., passim.
Ministry of Transport, Portbury: reasons for the Minister’s decision not to authorise the construction of a new dock at Portbury, Bristol, HMSO, London (1966), annex 4.
M. F. Tanner and A. F. Williams, Port development and national planning strategy, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1 (1967), pp. 315–24.
M. E. Beesley, T. M. Coburn and D. J. Reynolds, The London-Birmingham Motorway: traffic and economics, Road Research Technical Paper no. 46, HMSO, London (1960), pp. 18–36 and 87.
Foster and Beesley, op. cit.
Ministry of Transport, Rural Bus Services, HMSO, London (1961), chapter 2.
Ibid., paragraphs 17–20.
D. St J. Thomas, The Rural Transport Problem, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1963), chapters 5 and 9.
Rural Bus Services in Denbighshire, report of working party, Denbighshire County Council, Ruthin (1971), appendices A, B and C.
Thomas, op. cit., pp. 65–70.
Ibid., p. 65.
Rural Bus Services, chapter 7.
Ministry of Transport, Rural Bus Services: report of local inquiries, HMSO, London (1965), p. 7, Thomas, op. cit., p. 165, Rural Bus Services, op. cit., p. 33.
K. M. Gwilliam, Transport and Public Policy, Allen and Unwin, London (1964), part IV.
C. I. Savage, An Economic History of Transport, Hutchinson, London (1966), p. 172.
Gwilliam, op. cit., p. 214.
M. R. Bonavia, The Economics of Transport, Cambridge University Press (1957 edition), chapter 6.
H. O. Mance, The Road and Rail Transport Problem, Pitman, London (1941).
E. J. Mishan, The Costs of Economic Growth, Penguin, Harmondsworth (1969), pp. 113–35.
The Reshaping of British Railways, op. cit., pp. 40–1.
Ibid., p. 41.
B. T. Bayliss, European Transport, Mason, London (1965), p. 101.
Ibid., p. 111.
A. Hazlewood, Rail and Road in East Africa, Blackwell, Oxford (1964), chapter 6.
Ministry of Transport, The Transport of Freight, HMSO, London (1967).
A. A. Walters. Integration in Freight Transport, Institute of Economic Affairs, Research Monograph no. 15, London (1968), chapter 5.
Ministry of Transport, Carriers’ Licensing, HMSO, London (1965). p. 74.
Carriers’ Licensing, op. cit., chapter 2.
Ibid., p. 23.
As reported by Hazlewood, op. cit., pp. 44–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1973 Alan M. Hay
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hay, A. (1973). Decision Making and Government Policy in the Transport Sector. In: Transport for the Space Economy. Focal Problems in Geography Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86191-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86191-0_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-11419-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-86191-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)