Skip to main content

Abstract

Almost 200 years elapsed between the publication of the first of the above quotations and the second; during that period economics has greatly increased our understanding of the theory of choice and the relationship which exists between concepts of need, necessities and demands. The works of economists have not, however, been fully absorbed into the literature on social policy and administration, and the quotation from The Fifth Social Service owes more to early pre-scientific works on economics than to the work of great nineteenth-century authors such as Jevons,1 Wicksell,2 Marshall3 or Wicksteed.4 Twentieth-century economists working in the field of demand theory have been almost completely ignored in the emphasis given by social administrators to ‘law’, ‘regulation’, ‘policy’ and ‘custom’.

By necessities I understand not only the commodities which are indispensably necessary for the support of life, but whatever the custom of the country renders it indecent for creditable people, even of the lowest order, to be without. A linen shirt, for example is, strictly speaking not a necessary of life — [but] — in the present time, through the greater part of Europe, a creditable day labourer would be ashamed to appear in public without a linen shirt. (Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations bk 5, ch. 2, pt II, Discussion on Taxes upon Consumable Commodities, 1776.)

In examining social or normative definitions of need the social scientist can help to bring them into the open, reveal contradictions and loose ends and show the different functions played by law, regulation, policy and custom. (Peter Townsend, The Fifth Social Service (London: Fabian Society, 1970) ch. 1, p. 9.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. William Stanley Jevons, Political Economy (London: Macmillan, 1878).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. G. K. Wicksell, Lectures in Political Economy English trans. with introduction by L. C. Robbins (London: Routledge, 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics, 1st edn (London: Macmillan, 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Philip H. Wicksteed, The Common Sense of Political Economy (London: Macmillan, 1910).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For elegant statements of the revealed-preference approach to demand theory, see Geoffrey P. E. Clarkson, The Theory of Consumer Demand: A Critical Appraisal (London: Gower Press, 1963);

    Google Scholar 

  6. or Robert Dorfman, The Price System (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964) chs 1 and 3;

    Google Scholar 

  7. see also P. A. Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis (Harvard University Press, 1947) ch. 5;

    Google Scholar 

  8. and Sir John R. Hicks, Revision of Demand Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956). For correct usage of the term ‘demand’ see Leslie L. Roos Jr, ‘Quasi-Experiments and Environmental Policy’, Policy Sciences, vol. 6. no. 3 (September 1975) where studies of the demand for various underpriced goods and of programmes for changing usage of a collective good are suggested; see also James M. Buchanan, ‘Public Finance and Public Choice’, National Tax Journal, vol. XXVIII, no. 4 (Dec 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alan Williams and Robert Anderson, Efficiency in the Social Services (Oxford: Blackwell, 1975); see especially chs 4, 5 and 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Bradshaw, ‘A Taxonomy of Social Need’, in Problems and Progress in Medical Care, ed. Gordon McLachlan, 7th series (Oxford University Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alan Williams, ‘“Need” as a Demand Concept’, in Economic Policies and Social Goals, ed. A. J. Culyer (London: Martin Robertson, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Townsend et al., The Fifth Social Service (London: Fabian Society, 1970) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. F. J. Piachaud, Do the Poor Pay More? Poverty Research Series no. 3 (London: Child Poverty Action Group, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. John L. Nicholson, ‘The Distribution and Redistribution of Income in the United Kingdom’, in Poverty, Inequality and Class Structure, ed. Dorothy Wedderburn (Cambridge University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lionel C. Robbins, An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science (London: Macmillan, 1932);

    Google Scholar 

  16. see also Fritz Machlup, ‘Essay on the Universal Bogey’, in Essays in Honour of Lord Robbins, ed. M. Peston and B. Corry (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1977 Helmuth Heisler, John Carrier, Bleddyn Davies, Neil Fraser, Howard Jones, Peter Kaim-Caudle, Ian Kendall, Thomas McPherson, Della Adam Nevitt, Muriel Nissel, Barbara Rodgers, J. D. Stewart, George F. Thomason

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nevitt, D.A. (1977). Demand and Need. In: Heisler, H. (eds) Foundations of Social Administration. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86159-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86159-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-18648-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-86159-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics