Skip to main content

Dimensions of Social Administration

  • Chapter
Foundations of Social Administration
  • 17 Accesses

Abstract

Uncertainty and poverty in the lives of individuals and groups have been major concerns of social administration. As these pathologies of the human condition have been studied by means of different and often unrelated perspectives, a complication of interdisciplinary studies, the result has been that social administration as a subject has appeared to be inchoate. But this under-estimates its strength. By considering its philosophical and historical legacies and constraints, theoretical and empirical issues, academic social administration can be revealed to possess a measure of cohesion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Cf. M. Gluckman (ed.), Closed Systems and Open Minds (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Gerschenkron, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (New York: Praeger, 1965) p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Law, ‘The Individual and the Community’, in The Character of England, ed. E. Barker (Oxford University Press, 1950) p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Speech to the Electors of Bristol (3 November 1774), quoted by B. Newman, Edmund Burke (London: G. Bell, 1927) p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. S. Amery, Thoughts on the Constitution (Oxford University Press, 1947) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Curtis, Civitas Dei (London: Allen & Unwin, 1950) p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Quoted in H. L. Beales, The Making of Social Policy, L. T. Hobhouse Memorial Trust Lecture No. 15 (Oxford University Press, 1946) p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quoted in K. Hutchison, The Decline and Fall of British Capitalism (London: Cape, 1951) pp. 323, 326.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Macaulay: Prose and Poetry, selected by G. M. Young (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1952) pp. 766–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Paine, The Rights of Man (London: Dent, 1915) p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. W. Keeton, The Passing of Parliament (London: Ernest Benn, 1952) p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Heisler, ‘Economic Competition and the Political Stability of Plural Societies’, Sociological Review Monograph No. 14, ed. P. Halmos (Keele University, 1969) pp. 140–3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Landes, ‘Technological Change and Development in Western Europe 1750–1914’, in The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, ed. H. J. Habakkuk and M. Postan (Cambridge University Press, 1965) vol. VI, pp. 274–603, esp. 354, 561.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. E. Apter, ‘System, Process, and Politics of Economic Development’, in Industrialisation and Society, ed. B. F. Hoselitz and W. E. Moore (UNESCO-Mouton, 1963) pp. 135–58;

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Etzioni, The Active Society (London: Collier-Macmillan, 1968) pp. 503–48;

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Pusic, ‘The Interdependence between Social and Economic Planning with Special Reference to Yugoslavia’, in Social Welfare Policy, First Collection, ed. J. A. Ponsioen (’s Gravenhage: Mouton, 1962) p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lord Beveridge, Power and Influence (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1953) p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quoted in T. Parsons, The Structure of Social Action, vol. I (New York: The Free Press, 1968) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quoted in T. S. Simey, ‘The Contribution of Sidney and Beatrice Webb to Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology, 12 (1961) pp. 106–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Myrdal, An American Dilemma, vol. II (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964) pp. 1041–51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. R. Hicks, The Social Framework (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960) pp. 3, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure (New York: The Free Press, 1957) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Parsons, ‘General Theory in Sociology’, in Sociology Today, ed. R. K. Merton et al. (New York: Basic Books, 1959) pp. 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Seldon, ‘Commitment to Welfare’, Social and Economic Administration, 2 (1968) p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Myrdal, Beyond the Welfare State (London: Duckworth, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. H. Tawney, The Acquisitive Society (London: Fontana, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. M. Titmuss, The Gift Relationship (London: Allen & Unwin, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Pinker, Social Theory and Social Policy (London: Heinemann, 1971) pp. 135–75.

    Google Scholar 

  29. H. Gaitskill, ‘An Appreciation’, in The Radical Tradition, R. H. Tawney (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966) p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  30. T. S. Simey, Welfare and Planning in the West Indies (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. M. Titmuss et al., Social Policies and Population Growth in Mauritius (London: Methuen, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. K. Merton, ‘Social Problems and Sociological Theory’, in Contemporary Social Problems, ed. R. K. Merton and R. Nisbet (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971) pp. 818–23.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. P. Roos, Welfare Theory and Social Policy (Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, 1973) pp. 29–59.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. S. Furnivall, Colonial Policy and Practice (New York University Press, 1956) p. 442.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. M. Titmuss, Commitment to Welfare (London: Allen & Unwin, 1968) p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  36. V. George and P. Wilding, ‘Values, Class and Social Policy’, Social and Economic Administration, 6 (1972) pp. 243–7;

    Google Scholar 

  37. cf. D. Birrell and A. Murie, ‘Ideology, Conflict and Social Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 4 (1975) pp. 243, 258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. A. L. Rowse, The England of Elizabeth (London: Macmillan, 1951) p. 354.

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. Cole, Beatrice Webb (London: Longmans, Green, 1945) pp. 150–1.

    Google Scholar 

  40. T. H. Marshall, Citizenship and Social Class (Cambridge University Press, 1950) pp. 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  41. R. M. Titmuss, Essays on the Welfare State (London: Allen & Unwin, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  42. George and Wilding, ‘Values, Class and Social Policy’, pp. 236–48; A. W. Gouldner, The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology (London: Heinemann, 1971) pp. 342–51.

    Google Scholar 

  43. F. Lafitte, ‘Social Policy in a Free Society’, Inaugural Lecture (University of Birmingham, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  44. T. Parsons, ‘An Outline of the Social System’, in Theories of Society I, ed. T. Parsons et al. (New York: The Free Press, 1961) p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  45. D. Lockwood, ‘Social Integration and System Integration’, in Explorations in Social Change, ed. G. K. Zollschan and W. Hirsch (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964) pp. 244–56;

    Google Scholar 

  46. N. Mouzelis, ‘Social and System Integration: Some Reflections on a Fundamental Distinction’, British Journal of Sociology, 25 (1974) pp. 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. H. Heisler, ‘The Civic Culture of Africa: Planning Solidarity and Development’, Civilisations, 17 (1967) pp. 224–39;

    Google Scholar 

  48. A. C. Pigou, The Economics of Welfare (London: Macmillan, 1950) pp. 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  49. P. Ford, Social Theory and Social Practice (Irish University Press, 1968) p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. S. Milward, The Economic Effects of the World Wars on Britain (London: Macmillan, 1970) pp. 16–24;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. A. T. Peacock and J. Wiseman, The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom (London: Allen & Unwin, 1967) pp. xiii–xv, 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  52. See, for example, W. Bell, ‘Social Change and Elites in an Emergent Nation’, in Social Change in Developing Areas, ed. H. R. Barringer et al. (Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, 1965) pp. 155–204, esp. 165–8;

    Google Scholar 

  53. H. Heisler, ‘Approaches to the Study of Social Change and Zambia’, Sociologus, 21 (1971) pp. 118–38.

    Google Scholar 

  54. H. Heisler, ‘A Reconsideration of the Theory of Community Development’, International Social Work, 14 (1971) pp. 26–33;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. H. Heisler, ‘Social Service in Africa: Western Approaches’, Social and Economic Administration, 1 (1967) pp. 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. M. Oakeshott, Political Education (Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes, 1951) p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  57. K. R. Popper, The Poverty of Historicism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961) pp. 67, 69.

    Google Scholar 

  58. J. Hart, ‘Nineteenth Century Social Reform: A Tory Interpretation of History’, in Essays in Social History, ed. M. W. Flinn and T. C. Smout (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974) pp. 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  59. J. H. Goldthorpe, ‘The Development of Social Policy in England 1900–1914’, Transactions of the Fifth World Congress of Sociology, IV (Louvain: International Sociological Association, 1964) pp. 50–1.

    Google Scholar 

  60. H. Heisler, ‘Class and Class Competition in a Plural Society’, Doctoral Thesis (University College, Cardiff, 1971) pp. 151–8.

    Google Scholar 

  61. R. K. Merton, ‘The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action’, American Sociological Review, 1 (1936) pp. 894–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. W. E. Moore and M. M. Tumin, ‘Some Social Functions of Ignorance’, American Sociological Review, 14 (1949) pp. 787–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. W. Baldamus, ‘Sociological Trends’, British Journal of Sociology, 25 (1974) pp. 378–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. P. M. Hauser, ‘Social Accounting’, in The Uses of Sociology, ed. P. F. Lazarsfeld et al. (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1968) pp. 839–75.

    Google Scholar 

  65. B. Wootton, Social Science and Social Pathology (London: Allen & Unwin, 1959) p. 326.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Cf. I. D. J. Bross, ‘Statistical Criticism’, in The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, ed. E. R. Tufte (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1970) pp. 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  67. G. Schubert, The Public Interest (New York: The Free Press, 1960) pp. 220, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  68. P. Halmos, The Personal Service Society (London: Constable, 1970) pp. 63–144.

    Google Scholar 

  69. J. Galtung, Theory and Methods of Social Research (London: Allen & Unwin, 1967) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  70. See, for example, D. Wedderburn (ed.), Poverty, Inequality and Class Structure (Cambridge University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  71. A. W. Gouldner, ‘Explorations in Applied Social Science’, Social Problems, III (1956) pp. 169–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1977 Helmuth Heisler, John Carrier, Bleddyn Davies, Neil Fraser, Howard Jones, Peter Kaim-Caudle, Ian Kendall, Thomas McPherson, Della Adam Nevitt, Muriel Nissel, Barbara Rodgers, J. D. Stewart, George F. Thomason

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heisler, H. (1977). Dimensions of Social Administration. In: Heisler, H. (eds) Foundations of Social Administration. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86159-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86159-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-18648-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-86159-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics