Advertisement

Political regions and time

  • Richard Muir
Chapter

Abstract

With the exception of inhospitable polar regions and a few scattered areas where colonial relationships survive, the land surface of the earth is now divided up into a political patchwork of sovereign states. In area after area previous forms of political region have yielded to the sovereign state, though the processes of political-geographical evolution have varied remarkably. ‘Ideas about boundaries’, writes Jones, ‘are related to their geographical and historical milieu.’1 The same applies to the political regions contained within these boundaries. Particular forms of political region are related to particular stages in social and political organisation, with changes in the level of a group’s development leading to a reappraisal of its political-geographical circumstance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. B. Jones, Boundary concepts in the setting of place and time, Annals Assoc. Am. Geogr., 49 (1959), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Morris, The Human Zoo, London (1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative, New York (1966).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Bleibtrau, The Parable of the Beast, London (1968).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Kirk, The primary agricultural colonisation of Scotland, Scot. Geogr. Mag., 73 (1957), 65–90.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Muir, The political geography of north-east Scotland, PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. de Blij, Systematic Political Geography, New York (1967), p. 4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. B. Jones, A unified field theory of political geography, Annals Assoc. Am. Geogr., 44(1954), 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    See ref. 7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. R. V. Prescott, The Geography of Frontiers and Boundaries, London (1965), pp. 49–53.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See ref. 10.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    See A. Cobban, The nation state, History, 29 (March 1944), for further discussion on this point.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seeref. 7, p.5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Oppenheim, International Law, 7th edition, vol. 1, London (1952).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. H. Alexandrowicz, New and original states, Internat. Affairs, 45 (1969), 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. I. Lenin, The State, a lecture at Sverdlovsk University (1919), Peking (1965).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seeref. 2.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. E. Hertz, Rise and demise of the territorial state, World Politics, 9 (1957), no. 4, 473–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    L. D. Kristof, The nature of frontiers and boundaries, Annals Assoc. Am. Geogr., 49 (1959), no. 31, 269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    See ref. 19.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. W. Meinig, Heartland and rimland in Eurasian history, Western Pol. Q., 9 (1956), 553–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. F. G. Whebell, Flashpoints for future world conflict, Geogr. Mag. (June 1970).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Freeberne, Minority unrest and Sino-Soviet rivalry in Sinkiang, in Essays in Political Geography (ed. C. A. Fisher), London (1968).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    F. W. Carter, An analysis of the medieval Serbian oecumene: a theoretical approach, Geografiska Annale, 51B(1969), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    See ref. 6.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    F. Ratzel, The laws of the spatial growth of states (1896), English translation in The Structure of Political Geography (ed. R. E. Kaspersen and J. V. Minghi), Chicago (1969).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    D.S. Whittlesey, The Earth and the State, New York (1939), p. 597.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    See ref. 27, p. 2.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    N. J. G. Pounds and S. S. Ball, Core areas and the development of the European states systems, Annals Assoc. Am. Geogr., 54 (1964), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    See ref. 8, 111–23.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The main circumstances and events are outlined in: M. S. Rajan, Bangladesh and after, Pacific Affairs, 45 (1972), no. 2, 191–205;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. G. W. Choudhury, Bangladesh: why it happened, Internat. Affairs, 48 (1972), 242–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Richard Muir 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Muir
    • 1
  1. 1.Cambridgeshire College of Arts and TechnologyUK

Personalised recommendations