Skip to main content

Power, the Dialectic of Control and Class Structuration

  • Chapter

Part of the Contemporary Social Theory book series

Abstract

In this discussion I shall seek to draw some connections between certain aspects of the theory of structuration and the analysis of class structure in capitalist societies. The theory of structuration is based upon the following claims: that social theory (which I take to be relevant equally to each of the social scientific disciplines: sociology, anthropology, psychology and economics, as well as history) should incorporate an understanding of human behaviour as action; that such an understanding has to be made compatible with a focus upon the structural components of social institutions or societies; and that notions of power and domination are logically, not just contingently, associated with the concepts of action and structure as I conceptualise them.1 I shall not be concerned to substantiate these claims, but shall attempt rather to trace out a few of their implications for issues that I take to be important to class analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See New Rules of Sociological Method (London: Hutchinson, 1976); Studies in Social and Political Theory (London: Hutchinson, 1977); Central Problems in Social Theory (London: Macmillan, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Central Problems in Social Theory, pp. 145 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See New Rules of Sociological Method.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harry Braverman, Labour and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Max Weber, Economy and Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978) vol. 1, p.223.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wolfgang Mommsen, The Age of Bureaucracy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. Arthur Mitzman, The Iron Cage. (New York: Grosset & Dunlop, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emile Durkheim, The Division of Labour in Society (New York: Free Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter M. Blau, The Dynamics of Bureaucracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967); see also the important discussion in

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin Albrow, Bureaucracy (London: Pall Mall, 1970).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Michel Crozier, The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (London: Tavistock, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Central Problems in Social Theory, pp. 147 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. Reinhard Bendix, Work and Authority in Industry (New York: Harper, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Braverman, Labour and Monopoly Capital, p.27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Russell Jacoby’s review of Labour and Monopoly Capital, in Telos, no. 29, 1976; and Gavin Mackenzie, ‘The political economy of the American working class’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 28, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies (London: Hutchinson, 1973) p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. Bryan Palmer, ‘Class, conception and conflict: the thrust for efficiency, managerial views of labour and working class rebellion, 1903–22’, Review of Radical Political Economy, vol. 7, 1975;

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. G. J. Aitken, Taylorism at Watertown Arsenal (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960);

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stanley Aronowitz, False Promises (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973), and ‘Marx, Braverman, and the logic of capital’, Insurgent Sociologist, Winter 1978–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrew L. Friedman, Industry and Labour (London: Macmillan, 1977).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Cf. Michael Buraway, The Manufacture of Consent (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman, Industry and Labour, p.7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.B. Macpherson, The Real World of Democracy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  25. For a critique of functionalism, in the light of the conception of structuration, see ‘Functionalism: après la lutte’, in my Studies in Social and Political Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wolfgang Müller and Christel Neusüss, ‘The “welfare-state illusion” and the contradiction between wage-labour and capital’, in John Holloway and Sol Piciotto (eds), State and Capital: a Marxist Debate (London: Arnold, 1978) p.34.

    Google Scholar 

  27. For the elements of such analysis, see my A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism (London: Macmillan, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. B. Bottomore, Karl Marx: Early Writings (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964) p.125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Anthony Giddens

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giddens, A. (1982). Power, the Dialectic of Control and Class Structuration. In: Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86056-2_14

Download citation