Abstract
There are, then, as we have maintained, two ways in which metaphysical theories may be analogies. As analogies of being, they seek to say something about “ reality “ transcending experience, in terms of relations found within experience. As co-ordinating analogies, they seek to relate diverse types of experience by extension of a key idea derived from some predominant intellectual or spiritual relation. Such ideas share something of the character of scientific models. But whereas scientific models suggest possible patterns for the co-ordination of data of a homogeneous type, the metaphysical model has to suggest a possible pattern of co-ordination between data of different types. A metaphysician has therefore to be sensitive to the diversities within experience, and also to possible modes of relationship. Moreover, whereas in the case of the scientific model the data to be co-ordinated are whatever relevant conclusions from observation may be available at the time in the work of the science in question, for the metaphysical “ model “ the data themselves must be extracted out of the whole manifold of experience by means of discriminatory judgments of what is important.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Note
I. A. Richards, The Philosophy of Rhetoric, pp. 130–131 (New York, 1936).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1966 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emmet, D. (1966). The Contemporary Prospect. In: The Nature of Metaphysical Thinking. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81774-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81774-0_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81776-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81774-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)