Abstract
Earlier writing in sociology held that kinship involvement would not be found in the urban environment. R. E. Park, for example, wrote in 1928: “It is in the cities that old clan and kinship groups are broken up and replaced by social organization based on rational interests and temperamental predilections.”2 It was expected that the household unit —the nuclear family —would be the only kinship structure found in the cities; the social and geographic mobility of an organized society would make contact between related households impossible. Distances would become too great.
The term “the extended family” is used to refer to the pattern of visiting and mutual aid related households that has been found to exist in urban areas of the United States and Great Britain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Robert Ezra Park, “Human Migration and the Marginal Man”, American Journal of Sociology, XXXIII, No. 6 (May 1928), p. 890.
Philippe Gangue, “French Canadian Kinship and Urban Life”, American Anthropologist, LVIII, No. 6 (December 1956), pp. 1090–1101.
Marvin Sussman and Lee Burchinal have recently summarized the findings of over forty studies, many of which specifically document the existence of the extended family in urban areas. Marvin B. Sussman and Lee Burchinal, “Kin Family Network; Unheralded Structure in Current Conceptualizations of Family Functioning”, Marriage and Family Living, XXIV, No. 3 (August 1962), pp. 231–9.
William J. Goode, “Illegitimacy in the Caribbean”, American Sociological Review, XXV, No. 1 (February 1960), pp. 21–30.
E. Franklin Frazier, The Negro Family in the United States (Chicago, 1939).
Michael Young and Peter Willmott, Family and Kinship in East London (Glencoe, 1957).
Michael Young, “Kinship and Family in East London”, Man, LIV (September 1954), pp. 137–8.
Dorrian Apple Sweetser, “Asymmetry in Intergeneration Family Relationships”, Social Forces, XLI, No. 4 (May 1963), p. 349.
Detroit Area Study, The Survey Research Center, A Social Profile of Detroit: 1955 (Ann Arbor, 1956), p. 21.
Ibid., p. 23. Somewhat lower figures are reported in two studies conducted in California: Wendell Bell and Marian D. Boat, “Urban Neighborhoods and Informal Social Relations”, American Journal of Sociology, LXII (January 1957), pp. 391–8,
and Scott Greer, “Urbanism Reconsidered: a Comparative Study of Local Areas in a Metropolis”, American Sociological Review, XXI (February 1956), pp. 19–25.
Paul C. Glick, American Families (New York, 1957) pp. 44–5.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1968 The Macmillan Company of Canada Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pineo, P.C. (1968). The Extended Family in a Working-Class Area of Hamilton. In: Blishen, B.R., Jones, F.E., Naegele, K.D., Porter, J. (eds) Canadian Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81601-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81601-9_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81603-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81601-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)