Skip to main content

The Daemonic ‘Beyond Good and Evil’

  • Chapter
The Moral Prism
  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of the Daemonic goes back a long way. It appears in an ancient Greek context, and its history there is interesting as a background to its later fortunes. It stands for a kind of power not necessarily individualised, still less personalised.1 It is often referred to impersonally: τò δαιμόνων. H. J. Rose2 thinks a daemon may have first been a spirit, and then been thought of impersonally. E. R. Dodds says:3 ‘Such evidence as we have suggests rather that while μοίρα developed from an impersonal “portion” into a personal Fate, δαίμων evolved in the opposite direction, from a personal “Apportioner”, cf. δαιω, δαιμόνη, to an impersonal “luck”. There is a point where the two developments cross and the words are virtually synonymous.’ It can also be used adjectivally of someone or something that manifests power. In addressing a person, ώ δαιμόνιε is like ‘Your Excellency’, but sometimes also it is less respectful and more convivial—rather like ‘my good Sir’, αγαθός δαίμων is also used as a toast—‘Here’s luck’. In some of these forms of address it is not so much a status word as a property word for someone or something having some special powers, which are not quite divine but can be somehow connected with divinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. B. Onians, The Origins of European Thought about the Body, the Mind, The Soul, the World, Time and Fate (Cambridge, 1951), says: ‘The genius was, I suggest, in origin the Roman analogy to the ψυχή as here explained, the life-spirit active in procreation, dissociated from and external to the conscious self that is central in the chest (p. 129)… Not only was his genius thus apparently liable to intervene or take possession of a man but we shall see reason to believe that it was, in the time of Plautus, thought to enjoy knowledge beyond what was enjoyed by the conscious self and to give the latter warning of impending events … (p. 160). The idea of the genius seems to have served in great part as does the twentieth-century concept of an “unconscious mind” influencing a man’s life and actions apart from and despite his conscious mind’ (p. 161).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Dorothy Emmet

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Emmet, D. (1979). The Daemonic ‘Beyond Good and Evil’. In: The Moral Prism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81421-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81421-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81423-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81421-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics