Where Next for the Professionalization of Security?
The scope of professional practice within security risk management has broadened substantially in the new millennium. As corporations are now operating within an increasingly complex, globalized business environment, they often have to take greater risks in doing so, and rely more on their security departments and other organizational risk management functions to mitigate these. The new millennium has also presented a number of new risks and regulatory requirements affecting business, as highlighted in the research by Briggs and Edwards (2006) on the changing role of corporate security departments. Growing regulatory controls on corporations, following the high-profile collapses of Enron in 2001 and World Com and Tyco in 2002, and heightened concern globally about the problems of bribery, corruption and money laundering have raised the status of organizational risk management within corporate governance structures. The events of 9/11 and subsequent terrorist attacks around the world have signalled that corporations are viable terrorist targets and afforded greater priority to business continuity and crisis management within organizations. Most recently, the increasing threat of cyber-attack and the risks to organizations associated with information security breaches has placed security departments under pressure to integrate their activities better with those of corporate IT departments, in order to address converged security threats (Azeem et al., 2013).
KeywordsIraq Monopoly Mili Briton
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chartered Institute of Personnel Development (CIPD) (2011).Competence and Competency Frameworks. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
- Evetts, J., Mieg, H.A. and Felt, U. (2006). Professionalization, Scientific Expertise, and Elitism: A Sociological Perspective, in Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J. and Hoffman, R.R. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 105–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths, M., Brooks, D.J., Corkill, J. (2010). Defining the Security Professional: Definition Through a Body of Knowledge. Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Security and Intelligence Conference, 44–52, Perth.Google Scholar
- Howe, D. (1986). Social Workers and Their Practice in Welfare Bureaucracies. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
- Larson, M.S. (1977). The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- McGee, A. (2006). Corporate Security’s Professional Project: An Examination of the Modern Condition of Corporate Security Management, and the Potential for Further Professionalisation of the Occupation. MSc Thesis, Shrivenham: Cranfield University.Google Scholar
- Scott, D., Brown, A., Lunt, I. and Thorne, L. (2004). Professional Doctorates: Integrating Professional and Academic Knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Sennewald, C.A. (2011). Effective Security Management. 5th ed. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Shepherd, M. and Atkinson, R. (2011). Project Management Bodies of Knowledge; Conjectures and Refutations.. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(2), 152–158.Google Scholar
- Simonsen, C. (1996). The Case for: Security Management Is a Profession.. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention, 1(3), 229–232.Google Scholar
- Wakefield, A. and Button, M. (2013). New Perspectives on Police Education and Training: Lessons from the Private Security Sector, in Stanislas, P. (ed.) International Perspectives on Police Education and Training. London: Routledge.Google Scholar