Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter examines the nature of security industry regulation and proposes a best practice model aimed at striking a balance across the interests of stakeholder groups: the general public, security clients, security companies and employees. The chapter begins by briefly outlining the nature and purposes of regulation generally, along with some prominent critiques and theories of regulatory methods. A brief history of security industry regulation is provided, followed by an examination of problems and forms of misconduct that regulation attempts to minimize. An outline is provided of different types of security regulation at the contextual level — covering criminal, civil and commercial laws — with an assessment of the benefits and limitations of these approaches. The focus then shifts to industry-specific forms of regulation — self-regulation, co-regulation and specialist government regulation — and the pros and cons of each. Finally, the chapter concludes by advocating a model form of standard minimum industry regulation, with add-ons for different circumstances. The model is based on the concepts of ‘smart regulation’, ‘responsive regulation’ and ‘wide and deep regulation’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Australian Crime Commission (2011). Private Security Industry Criminal Infiltration. Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. (2008). Holding South Africa’s Private Security Industry Accountable: Mechanisms of Control and Challenges to Oversight.. Acta Criminologica, 21(1), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, T. and Sedgwick, C. (2009). Policing Beyond the Police: A ‘First Cut’ Study of Private Security in New Zealand.. Policing and Society, 19(4), 468–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button, M. (2012). Optimizing Security Through Effective Regulation: Lessons from Around the Globe, in Prenzler, T. (ed.) Policing and Security in Practice: Challenges and Achievements. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, M. and George, B. (2006). Regulation of Private Security: Models for Analysis, in Gill, M. (ed.) Handbook of Security, 563–585. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., Park, H. and Lee, J. (2006). The Private Security Industry in South Korea: A Familiar Tale of Growth, Gaps and the Need for Better Regulation.. Security Journal, 19(3), 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CoESS (2006). Development of the European Educational Toolkit for Three Private Security Activities. Wemmel: Confederation of European Security Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoESS (2012). Private Security Services in Europe: CoESS Facts and Figures 2011. Wemmel: Confederation of European Security Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. (2009). Celebrating 40 Years, ASIAL 1969–2009, Then and Now: Licensing and Training.. Security Insider. August/September, 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W.C., Strauchs, J.J. and van Meter, C.W. (1990). Private Security Trends 1970–2000. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., Ortiz, C., Dadush, S., Irish, J., Alvarado, A. and Davis, D. (2003). The Public Accountability of Private Police: Lessons from New York, Johannesburg, and Mexico City.. Policing and Society, 13(2), 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waard, J. (1999). The Private Security Industry in International Perspective.. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 7(2), 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A. (2010). The Tools of Regulation. Sydney: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, P. and Braithwaite, J. (1986). Of Manners Gentle: The Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N. and Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAC (2009). Report on Corruption in the Provision and Certification of Security Industry Training. Sydney: Independent Commission Against Corruption.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakalik, S.J. and Wildhorn, S. (1971a). Current Regulation of Private Police: Agency Experience and Views. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakalik, S.J. and Wildhorn, S. (1971b). Private Police in the United States: Findings and Recommendations. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Jr, R.H. (1990). Licensing and Regulation of the Private Security Industry: A Historical View of the Court’s Role.. Journal of Security Administration, 13(1&2), 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newspoll. (2004). Security Study: Prepared for the Australian Security Industry Association Limited. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, D., Lippert, R., Greenfield, K. and Boyle, P. (2004). After the ‘Quiet Revolution’: The Self-Regulation of Ontario Contract Security Agencies.. Policing and Society, 14(2), 138–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. and Prenzler, T. (2012). Corruption Prevention and Complaint Management, in Prenzler, T. (ed.) Policing and Security in Practice: Challenges and Achievements. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T. (1995). Security Managers’ Perceptions of Industry Regulation: An Australian Study.. Security Journal, 6(2), 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T. and Hayes, H. (1999). An Evaluation of the Queensland Security Providers Act.. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T. and Milroy, A. (2012). Recent Inquiries into the Private Security Industry in Australia: Implications for Regulation.. Security Journal, 25(4), 342–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T. and Sarre, R. (2008). Developing a Risk Profile and Model Regulatory System for the Security Industry.. Security Journal, 21(4), 264–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T. and Sarre, R. (2012). The Evolution of Security Industry Regulation in Australia.. International Journal for Crime and Justice, 1(1), 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. (2014). Legal Powers and Obligations, in Prenzler, T. (ed.) Professional Practice in Crime Prevention and Security Management, 149–162. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. and Prenzler, T. (2009). The Law of Private Security in Australia. 2nd ed. Sydney: Thomson LBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. and Prenzler, T. (2011). Private Security and Public Interest: Exploring Private Security Trends and Directions for Reform in the New Era of Plural Policing. Sydney: Australian Security Industry Association Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Industry Authority (2010a). The Impact of Regulation on the Door Supervision Sector. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Industry Authority (2010b). The Impact of Regulation on the Security Guard Sector. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearing, C. and Stenning, P. (1981). Modern Private Security: Its Growth and Implications, in Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, 193–245. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, M. (2000). The Regulatory Craft. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T. (2002). A Comparative Overview of Legislation Governing the Private Security Industry in the European Union. Birmingham: ECOTEC Research and Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. (2013). The Impact of the Private Security Industry Act 2001.. Security Journal, online pre-print, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, N.D. (2012). Due Diligence Obligations of Conduct: Developing a Responsibility Regime for PMSCs.. Criminal Justice Ethics, 31(3), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildhorn, S. (1975). Issues in Private Security. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, N. (1999). The Taming of the Japanese Private Security Industry.. Policing and Society, 9(3), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Tim Prenzler and Rick Sarre

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prenzler, T., Sarre, R. (2014). Regulation. In: Gill, M. (eds) The Handbook of Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-67284-4_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics