The Integration of Agriculture into an Overall Development Policy

  • Theodor Dams
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

Agricultural policy on a world-wide scale — that is to say, in developing as well as in developed countries — is confronted with a common problem, namely the promotion of the adjustment process of agriculture in a growing economy:
  1. (a)

    In the highly industrialised nations of the Western world, too many productive resources are concentrated in agriculture. This misallocation of resources results in a disparity of incomes from agriculture in comparison with those from industry, considerable surpluses of agricultural produce, high public expenditures and lower rates of economic growth.

     
  2. (b)

    In almost all developing countries one finds a different form of misallocation of resources in agriculture. In this case, agriculture is incapable of achieving the increases of production necessary to feed a greatly expanding population and to earn the increasing amounts of foreign exchange necessary for the development of the economy as the whole.

     

Keywords

Migration Transportation Income Marketing Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    (a) Kuznets, S., ‘Economic Growth and the Contribution of Agriculture; Notes and Measurement’ and Nicholls, W. H., ‘The Place of Agriculture in Economic Development’, in C. K. Eicher and L. Witt (eds.), Agriculture in Economic Development (New York, 1964) p. 105.Google Scholar
  2. (b) Johnston, B. F., and Mellor, J. W., ‘The Role of Agriculture in Economic Development’, American Economic Review, LIV (1964) 566.Google Scholar
  3. (c) Urff, V. W., ‘Die Rolle des Agrarsektors im Wachstumsprozess der Entwicklungsländer,’ Agrarwirtschaft (Hanover, 1967) pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  4. [2]
    ‘The dangerous fallacy of economic planning as merely economics.’ See ‘The Administration of Economic Development Planning: Principles and Fallacies’, Economic Bulletin for Asia and Far East (United Nations, 1966).Google Scholar
  5. [3]
    Behrendt, R. F., Soziale Strategie für Entwicklungsländer: Entwurf einer Entwicklungssoziologie (Frankfurt, 1965) pp. 63–8.Google Scholar
  6. [4]
    ‘Any concerned action designed to further economic development, if based on an incorrect conception of human behaviour and its determinants cannot but result in failure.’ Kunkel, J. H., ‘Values and Behaviour in Economic Development’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, XIII (1965) 258.Google Scholar
  7. [5]
    United Nations, A Study of the Capacity of the United Nations Development System (Geneva, 1969). (Jackson Report.)Google Scholar
  8. [6]
    Griffin, K. B., and Enos, J. L., Planning Development (London, 1970).Google Scholar
  9. [7]
    Myrdal, G., ‘Agricultural Development and Planning in the Underdeveloped Countries outside the Socialist Sphere’, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Agricultural Economists, Minsk, 1970 (Oxford, 1971) p. 14. See Th. Dams, contribution to G. Myrdal’s paper, pp. 25–9.Google Scholar
  10. [8]
    Myint, H., ‘An Interpretation of Economic Backwardness’, in A. N. Agarwala and S. P. Singh (eds.), The Economics of Underdevelopment (New York, 1963) p. 97.Google Scholar
  11. [9]
    Meier, G. M., and Baldwin, R. E., Economic Development (New York, 1963) p. 97.Google Scholar
  12. [10]
    Rogers, E. M. (in association with Svenning, L.), Modernization among Peasants: The Impact of Communication (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
  13. [11]
    Jochimsen, R., Theorie der Infrastruktur: Grundlagen der marktwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (Tübingen, 1966) p. 152.Google Scholar
  14. [12]
    Balogh, T., ‘Economic Policy and the Price System’, in The Economics of Poverty (London, 1966) p. 3.Google Scholar
  15. Solomon, M. R., ‘The Structure of the Market in Underdeveloped Economies’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (1948) p. 519.Google Scholar
  16. [13]
    Dahrendorf, R., ‘Zu einer Theorie des sozialen Konflikts’, Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts- und Gelleschaftspolitik (Hamburg, 1958) pp. 82, 112.Google Scholar
  17. [14]
    Dams, Th., Marginalität: Motivierung und Mobilisierung von Selbsthilfegruppen als Aufgabe der Entwicklungspolitik, Kübel Foundation, Heft 3 (Bensheim, 1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodor Dams
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Freiburg-Im-BreisgaiGermany

Personalised recommendations