Abstract
Both Parnassianism and pictorialism were instrumental in providing a robust common identity to the otherwise diverse collage of personalities that became known as the Acmeists.The cogent connection between poets of the school has been uniformly underestimated in part because these two unifying elements have been given little scholarly attention
Poets create their precursors.
(Jorge Luis Borges)
Ruined temples. Poetry…
…You were a Hyperborean,
One of those at the back of the north wind
Whom Apollo favored and kept going back to …
You learned the lyre from him and kept it tuned.
(Seamus Heaney “A Hyperborean”)1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Seamus Heaney, “A Hyperborean.” The New Yorker (Jan. 18 1999): 56.
Cf. Nikolai Gumilev, “Acmeism and the Legacy of Symbolism.” In Nikolai Gumilev on Russian Poetry, trans. David Lapeza (Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1977), 21–24.
Justin Doherty, The Acmeist Movement in Russian Poetry. Culture and the Word (Oxford: Claredon Press, 1995), 86.
Mikhail Kuzmin, “O prekrasnoi iasnosti,” Apollon 14 (1910): 5–9, 7.
Cf. S.A.Tokarev, ed., Mify narodov mira, vol. 1 (Moscow: Sovetskaia entsik-lopediia, 1980), 304. Remarkably, in her books Isis Unveiled (1877) and The Secret Doctrine (1888), the founder of Theosophy, Madame Blavatsky, spoke of Hyperboreans as one of the races that inhabited the earth before human beings.
Osip Mandelstam, “The Morning of Acmeism.” In Osip Mandelstam, The Complete Critical Prose and Letters, trans. Jane Gary Harris and Constance Link (Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1979), 61–65, 65.
Cf. Nikita Struve, “Bog Akhmatovoi,” Pravoslavie i kul’tura (Moscow, 1992), 243–45, 244.
Elaine Rusinko, “Adamism and Acmeist Primitivism,” Slavic and East European Journal 32, 1 (1988): 84–97, 86.
Valery Briusov, Dalekie i blizkie (Moscow: Skorpion, 1912), 144.
Cf. Renato Poggioli, “The Neoparnassians.” In Poggioli, The Poets of Russia 1890–1930 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960), 212–37.
Evelyn Bristol, “Acmeists and the Parnassian Heritage.” In Jane Gary Harris, ed., American Contributions to the Tenth International Congress of Slavists (Columbus, Ohio: Slavica, 1988), 71–81.
Simon Karlinsky, “Nikolai Gumilev and Théophile Gautier.” In Boris Gas-parov, Robert P. Hughs, and Irina Paperno, eds., Cultural Mythologies of Russian Modernism: From the Golden Age to the Silver Age (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), 327–36, 329.
Barry P. Scherr, “Gumilev and Parnassianism.” In Lev Loseff & Barry Scherr, eds., A Sense of Place Tsarskoe Selo and Its Poets (Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers, 1993), 242–60, 243.
Cf. Louis Allain, “U istokov poetiki N. S. Gumileva. Frantsuzskaia i zapad-noevropeiskaia poeziia.” In M. D. El’zon & N. A. Groznova, eds., Nikolai Gumilev. Issledovaniia i materialy. Bibliografiia (Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 1994), 235–50.
V. V. Weidlé, “Peterburgskaia poetika.” In Gumilev, Sobranie sochinenii v chetyrekh tomakh (Washington: Victor Kamkin, Inc., 1962) vol. IV, V–XXXVI, IX.
Elaine Rusinko, “Acmeism, Post-symbolism, and Henri Bergson,” Slavic Review 41, 3 (1982): 494–510, 494.
Konstantin Mochulsky, “Klassitsizm v russkoi poezii,” Sovremennye zapiski 11 (1922): 368–79, 379.
Victor Terras, “Classical Motives in the Poetry of Osip Mandelstam,” Slavic and East European Journal 10, 3 (1966): 251–67, 253.
Clarence Brown, Mandelstam (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973), 137.
Nikolai Gumilev, “Teofil’ Got’e.” In Gumilev, Sobranie sochinenii, vol. IV (Washington: Victor Kamkin, 1968), 386–94, 387.
Léna Szilárd, Russkaia literatura kontsa XIX-nachala XX veka (1890–1917), vol. I (Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó, 1983), 484–85.
S.V. Poliakova, Osip Mandelstam: Nabliudeniia, interpretatsii, neopublikovannoe i zabytoe (Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1992), 9.
Sergei Gorodetsky, “Nekotorye techeniia v sovremennoi russkoi literature.” In Poeticheskie techeniia v russkoi literature kontsa XIX—nachala XX veka (Moscow: Vysshaia shkola, 1988), 90–96, 96.
Osip Mandelstam, Sobranie sochinenii v dvukh tomakh (Moscow: Khudozh-estvennaia literatura, 1990).
William Hardy, A Guide to Art Nouveau Style (North Dighton: JG Press, 1986), 8.
Cf. I. Koretskaia, Nad stranitsami russkoi poezii i prozy nachala veka (Moscow: RADIKS, 1995).
Cf. Théophile Gautier, Les Grotesques (Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1969), 1–39.
François Villon, “Ballade (of the Ladies of Bygone days).” In The Complete Works of François Villon, trans. Anthony Bonner (New York: David McKay Company, 1960), 39.
Cf. Georgy Ivanov, Sobranie sochinenii v trekh tomakh, vol. I (Moscow: So-glasie, 1994), 596.
Robert Sabatier, Histoire de la poésie française. La poésie du Moyen Age (Paris: Albin Michel, 1975), 351.
Cf. O. I. Fedotov, “Sonet Serebrianogo veka.” In Fedotov, ed., Sonet Sere-brianogo veka Russkii sonet kontsa XIX–nachala XX veka (Moscow: Pravda, 1990), 5–34, 21.
Cf. O. Fedotov, “Sonet v tvorchestve Anny Akhmatovoi.” In Problemy tvorch-estva i biografii A.A.Akhmatovoi (Odessa, 1989), 17–20.
Andrei Bely, “Budem iskat’ melodii (Predislovie k sborniku ‘Posle ra-zluki’).” In Bely, Stikhotvoreniia i poemy (Moscow-Leningrad, 1966), 546–50, 549.
Cf. Konstantin Mochulsky, Aleksandr Blok (Paris: YMCA-PRESS, 1948), 39.
Aleksandr Blok, “Intelligentsiia i Revoliutsiia.” In Blok, Sobranie sochinenii, vol. IV (Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 1982), 229–39, 239.
Efim Etkind, “Demokratiia, opoiasannaia burei (O muzykal’no-poetich-eskom stroenii poemy A. Bloka ‘Dvenadtsat’).” In Blok i muzyka (Leningrad: Sovetskii kompozitor, 1972), 58–84, 58.
Igor Glebov (B. V. Asaf’ev), “Videnie mira v dukhe muzyki (poeziia A. Bloka).” In Blok i muzyka (Leningrad: Sovetskii kompozitor, 1972), 8–57, 14, 50.
Sam Driver, “Acmeism,” Slavic and East European Journal 12, 2 (1968): 141–56, 144.
Copyright information
© 2000 Maria Rubins
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rubins, M. (2000). The Parnassian Roots of Acmeist Poetics. In: Crossroad of Arts, Crossroad of Cultures. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62736-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62736-3_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-62738-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-62736-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)